A person's worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honor, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Sample Essay with Corrections
Expert Feedback
The essay presents a clear argument regarding the importance of social status and material possessions in determining a person's worth, while also advocating for the relevance of traditional values. Key strengths of the essay include a logical structure with distinct paragraphs and a clear position on the topic. The writer effectively introduces the main points and provides examples to support their argument. Critical areas for improvement include addressing grammatical errors, particularly in subject-verb agreement and verb forms, as well as correcting spelling mistakes. The use of cohesive devices could be enhanced to improve the flow of ideas between paragraphs. Structural changes made include correcting grammatical errors, improving spelling, and enhancing the clarity of sentences without altering the original meaning. Transition phrases were added to improve coherence. Suggestions for further improvements not implemented in the corrected version include providing more specific examples of how old-fashioned values positively impact society and varying vocabulary to avoid repetition. The tone of the essay is appropriate for an academic context, maintaining a formal and objective stance throughout.
Detailed Scores
What this means:
The essay has a logical structure with clear paragraphs, but the flow of ideas could be improved. Some transitions between points are abrupt, and the use of cohesive devices is limited. For instance, using phrases like 'on the contrary' or 'in addition' could enhance the connection between ideas. Improving the overall coherence would strengthen the argument.
How to improve:
- Use a clear paragraph structure
- Connect ideas with appropriate linking words
- Maintain logical progression
- Use referencing effectively
What this means:
The essay contains several grammatical errors, including subject-verb agreement issues (e.g., 'people who has' should be 'people who have') and incorrect verb forms (e.g., 'will be see' should be 'will be seen'). While the writer demonstrates some range in sentence structures, the errors affect clarity. To improve, the writer should focus on proofreading for grammatical accuracy and ensuring subject-verb agreement.
How to improve:
- Use complex sentence structures
- Maintain grammatical accuracy
- Use a variety of sentence patterns
- Check for common grammar errors
What this means:
The vocabulary used is generally appropriate, but there are several spelling errors (e.g., 'beleiving', 'determin', 'there', 'possessions') that detract from the overall quality. The writer does use some varied vocabulary, but repetition of phrases like 'a person's worth' could be reduced by using synonyms or rephrasing. Expanding the range of vocabulary and correcting spelling errors would enhance this score.
How to improve:
- Use a wider range of vocabulary
- Demonstrate awareness of collocations
- Avoid word repetition
- Use more sophisticated vocabulary accurately
What this means:
The essay addresses the prompt by discussing the importance of social status and material possessions in judging a person's worth, while also arguing for the relevance of old-fashioned values. However, the development of ideas could be more thorough, with more specific examples and a clearer position throughout. To improve, the writer could provide more detailed examples of how old-fashioned values positively impact society.
How to improve:
- Address all parts of the task fully
- Support ideas with specific examples
- Develop each point thoroughly
- Stay relevant to the topic
Related Writing Samples
Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on individuals and society. To what extent do you agree?
Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
We have become a disposable society, preferring to buy new products rather than fixing existing items. What are the causes of this trend and what are the possible solutions?
The tendency that news reports in media focus on problems and emergencies rather than on positive developments is harmful for individuals and the society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Today single-use products are still very common. Why is this? What are the problems associated with this?
In the future, more people will choose to go on holiday in their own country and not travel abroad on holiday. Do you agree or disagree?