Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine. However, at best these methods are ineffective, and at worst they may be dangerous. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Sample Essay with Corrections
Expert Feedback
The essay presents a clear argument against alternative medicine, highlighting its ineffectiveness and potential dangers. Key strengths include a relevant topic and a basic structure that includes an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, critical areas for improvement include grammatical accuracy, coherence, and the development of ideas. The structural changes made include correcting grammatical errors, improving clarity, and enhancing the flow of ideas with better transitions. Suggestions for further improvements not implemented in the corrected version include providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the points made to strengthen the argument. The tone used is appropriate for an academic essay, maintaining a formal and critical perspective throughout.
Detailed Scores
What this means:
The essay has a basic structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, the flow of ideas is sometimes disrupted by awkward phrasing and grammatical errors. For instance, phrases like 'the alternative medicine are not passing any scienttific tests' could be rephrased for clarity. To enhance coherence, the writer should use more cohesive devices and ensure logical progression between ideas.
How to improve:
- Use a clear paragraph structure
- Connect ideas with appropriate linking words
- Maintain logical progression
- Use referencing effectively
What this means:
The essay contains numerous grammatical errors, including subject-verb agreement issues ('the alternative medicine are'), incorrect verb forms ('prefering'), and punctuation mistakes. These errors hinder clarity and detract from the overall effectiveness of the writing. While there are some attempts at complex sentences, the frequent mistakes suggest a need for improvement. To raise this score, the writer should focus on grammatical accuracy and sentence structure.
How to improve:
- Use complex sentence structures
- Maintain grammatical accuracy
- Use a variety of sentence patterns
- Check for common grammar errors
What this means:
The vocabulary used is generally appropriate, but there are several spelling errors (e.g., 'medicin', 'natuaral', 'enoguh') and some repetitive phrases (e.g., 'alternative medicine'). The use of terms like 'scientific tests' and 'ecological chain' shows some range, but the overall lexical resource could be improved by incorporating more varied and sophisticated vocabulary. To enhance this score, the writer should focus on using precise language and avoiding repetition.
How to improve:
- Use a wider range of vocabulary
- Demonstrate awareness of collocations
- Avoid word repetition
- Use more sophisticated vocabulary accurately
What this means:
The essay addresses the prompt by discussing the ineffectiveness and potential dangers of alternative medicine. However, it lacks a clear and well-developed position throughout, and some points are not fully elaborated. For example, while the mention of homeopathic pills is relevant, further examples or a more detailed discussion of the dangers could strengthen the argument. To improve, the writer should ensure that each point is fully developed with relevant examples and a clearer stance.
How to improve:
- Address all parts of the task fully
- Support ideas with specific examples
- Develop each point thoroughly
- Stay relevant to the topic
Related Writing Samples
Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on individuals and society. To what extent do you agree?
Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
We have become a disposable society, preferring to buy new products rather than fixing existing items. What are the causes of this trend and what are the possible solutions?
The tendency that news reports in media focus on problems and emergencies rather than on positive developments is harmful for individuals and the society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Today single-use products are still very common. Why is this? What are the problems associated with this?
In the future, more people will choose to go on holiday in their own country and not travel abroad on holiday. Do you agree or disagree?