In many societies in the world, the population is ageing rapidly and this is leading to an unsustainable increase in the cost of public healthcare. A nation's population should pay for their healthcare provision in the future. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Essay with Corrections
Expert Feedback
The essay presents a clear argument that individuals should pay for their healthcare, which is a key strength. The structure is logical, with distinct paragraphs for each main point, and the conclusion effectively summarizes the argument. However, there are critical areas for improvement, particularly in spelling, grammar, and the development of ideas. The original essay contained numerous spelling errors and grammatical mistakes that detracted from clarity and coherence. In the corrected version, these errors have been addressed, and the use of cohesive devices has been improved with smoother transitions between ideas. Further improvements could include the incorporation of specific examples or statistics to support the arguments, which would enhance the overall persuasiveness of the essay. Additionally, varying the vocabulary further could help to demonstrate a wider lexical range. The tone used is appropriate for an academic essay, maintaining a formal and persuasive style throughout.
Detailed Scores
What this means:
The essay has a logical structure, with clear paragraphs for each main idea. However, the use of cohesive devices is inconsistent, and some transitions between ideas could be smoother. For example, phrases like 'Firstly' and 'Secondly' are used, but more varied linking words could enhance the flow. Improving the use of cohesive devices would help in achieving a higher score.
How to improve:
- Use a clear paragraph structure
- Connect ideas with appropriate linking words
- Maintain logical progression
- Use referencing effectively
What this means:
The essay demonstrates a basic range of grammatical structures, but there are numerous grammatical errors (e.g., 'I am agree', 'this lead', 'the public spending in health will need to grow', 'the primary onus should be on citisens themselves'). These errors affect clarity and accuracy. To improve, the writer should focus on subject-verb agreement and sentence structure, ensuring that sentences are grammatically correct.
How to improve:
- Use complex sentence structures
- Maintain grammatical accuracy
- Use a variety of sentence patterns
- Check for common grammar errors
What this means:
The vocabulary used is generally appropriate, but there are several spelling errors (e.g., 'eldery', 'numerus', 'fust', 'shud', 'helth', 'requiered', 'expences', 'individuls', 'citisens') that detract from the overall quality. While some attempts at varied vocabulary are present, the frequent errors limit the effectiveness. To improve, the writer should focus on spelling accuracy and consider using a wider range of synonyms.
How to improve:
- Use a wider range of vocabulary
- Demonstrate awareness of collocations
- Avoid word repetition
- Use more sophisticated vocabulary accurately
What this means:
The essay addresses the prompt by presenting a clear position that individuals should pay for their healthcare. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited, and the arguments could be more thoroughly supported with specific examples. For improvement, the writer could include statistics or case studies to strengthen their points.
How to improve:
- Address all parts of the task fully
- Support ideas with specific examples
- Develop each point thoroughly
- Stay relevant to the topic
Related Writing Samples
Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on individuals and society. To what extent do you agree?
Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
We have become a disposable society, preferring to buy new products rather than fixing existing items. What are the causes of this trend and what are the possible solutions?
The tendency that news reports in media focus on problems and emergencies rather than on positive developments is harmful for individuals and the society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Today single-use products are still very common. Why is this? What are the problems associated with this?
In the future, more people will choose to go on holiday in their own country and not travel abroad on holiday. Do you agree or disagree?