In the future, people may no longer be able to pay for things in shops using cash. All payments may have to be made by card or using phones. Do you think this will happen one day? Why do you think some people might not be happy to give up using cash?
Sample Essay with Corrections
Expert Feedback
The essay demonstrates a clear understanding of the topic and presents a logical argument regarding the potential disappearance of cash. Key strengths include a well-structured format with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. However, critical areas for improvement include addressing spelling errors, grammatical inaccuracies, and enhancing the development of ideas with specific examples or statistics. Structural changes made include correcting grammatical errors, improving spelling, and enhancing transitions between ideas for better coherence. Suggestions for further improvements not implemented in the corrected version include providing more detailed examples of digital payment benefits and exploring the implications of a cashless society in greater depth. The tone used is appropriate for an academic essay, maintaining a formal and informative style throughout.
Detailed Scores
What this means:
The essay has a logical structure with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. However, the use of cohesive devices could be improved. For instance, transitions between ideas could be smoother, and the writer could use more varied linking phrases to enhance the flow of the essay. Phrases like 'on the other hand' or 'furthermore' could help in connecting contrasting ideas more effectively.
How to improve:
- Use a clear paragraph structure
- Connect ideas with appropriate linking words
- Maintain logical progression
- Use referencing effectively
What this means:
The essay contains several grammatical errors, including subject-verb agreement issues (e.g., 'will able' should be 'will be able') and incorrect verb forms. While the writer attempts to use complex sentences, the errors affect the overall clarity. To improve, the writer should focus on proofreading for grammatical accuracy and practice using a wider range of sentence structures correctly.
How to improve:
- Use complex sentence structures
- Maintain grammatical accuracy
- Use a variety of sentence patterns
- Check for common grammar errors
What this means:
The vocabulary used is generally appropriate, but there are several spelling errors (e.g., 'futur', 'beleive', 'shopes', 'compleetly', 'prefering', 'then') that detract from the overall quality. The writer demonstrates some range in vocabulary, but to achieve a higher score, they should aim for more sophisticated word choices and ensure correct spelling. For example, using 'completely' instead of 'compleetly' would enhance clarity.
How to improve:
- Use a wider range of vocabulary
- Demonstrate awareness of collocations
- Avoid word repetition
- Use more sophisticated vocabulary accurately
What this means:
The essay addresses the task by discussing the potential disappearance of cash and the reasons some people may resist this change. However, the development of ideas could be more thorough, with more specific examples or statistics to support the claims. For improvement, the writer could elaborate on the implications of a cashless society or provide more detailed examples of how digital payments enhance convenience and security.
How to improve:
- Address all parts of the task fully
- Support ideas with specific examples
- Develop each point thoroughly
- Stay relevant to the topic
Related Writing Samples
Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on individuals and society. To what extent do you agree?
Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
We have become a disposable society, preferring to buy new products rather than fixing existing items. What are the causes of this trend and what are the possible solutions?
The tendency that news reports in media focus on problems and emergencies rather than on positive developments is harmful for individuals and the society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Today single-use products are still very common. Why is this? What are the problems associated with this?
In the future, more people will choose to go on holiday in their own country and not travel abroad on holiday. Do you agree or disagree?