Innovation is often driven by the pursuit of profit and economic growth. However, some argue that it should prioritize addressing social and environmental issues. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Sample Essay with Corrections
Expert Feedback
The essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the task by discussing both sides of the argument regarding the focus of innovations. Key strengths include the clear identification of the two perspectives and the use of relevant examples, such as smartphones and green energy technology. However, critical areas for improvement include the need for clearer articulation of the writer's position, more specific examples, and enhanced coherence through better transitions and phrasing. Structural changes made include correcting grammatical errors, improving phrasing for clarity, and ensuring proper paragraph separation. Additionally, the conclusion was strengthened to clearly reflect the writer's opinion. Further improvements could include expanding on specific examples and providing more detailed explanations of how innovations can address social and environmental issues. The tone used is appropriate for an academic essay, maintaining a formal and objective stance throughout.
Detailed Scores
What this means:
The essay has a basic structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, the flow of ideas is sometimes disrupted by awkward phrasing and unclear transitions. For example, phrases like 'on the other hand side' could be improved to 'on the other hand.' Using more cohesive devices and ensuring logical progression between ideas would enhance coherence.
How to improve:
- Use a clear paragraph structure
- Connect ideas with appropriate linking words
- Maintain logical progression
- Use referencing effectively
What this means:
The essay contains several grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('there is many innovation'), incorrect verb forms ('growed' should be 'grown'), and awkward constructions ('should instead focusing'). While the writer demonstrates some range in sentence structures, the errors detract from overall clarity. To improve, the writer should focus on grammatical accuracy and sentence variety.
How to improve:
- Use complex sentence structures
- Maintain grammatical accuracy
- Use a variety of sentence patterns
- Check for common grammar errors
What this means:
The vocabulary used is generally appropriate, but there are instances of repetition and inaccuracies, such as 'help the economy to growed' (should be 'grow') and 'bringing a lot of economic benefit.' The use of phrases like 'green energy technology' is positive, but the overall range of vocabulary is limited. To improve, the writer should aim to use a wider variety of vocabulary and avoid repetitive phrases.
How to improve:
- Use a wider range of vocabulary
- Demonstrate awareness of collocations
- Avoid word repetition
- Use more sophisticated vocabulary accurately
What this means:
The essay addresses the task by discussing both sides of the argument regarding innovation's focus on profit versus social and environmental issues. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited, and the position is not clearly articulated. To improve, the writer could provide more specific examples and a clearer conclusion that reinforces their opinion.
How to improve:
- Address all parts of the task fully
- Support ideas with specific examples
- Develop each point thoroughly
- Stay relevant to the topic
Related Writing Samples
Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on individuals and society. To what extent do you agree?
Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
We have become a disposable society, preferring to buy new products rather than fixing existing items. What are the causes of this trend and what are the possible solutions?
The tendency that news reports in media focus on problems and emergencies rather than on positive developments is harmful for individuals and the society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Today single-use products are still very common. Why is this? What are the problems associated with this?
In the future, more people will choose to go on holiday in their own country and not travel abroad on holiday. Do you agree or disagree?