Public transportation is being used more and more by people today. Some say that using public transportation is better than driving a car for both individuals and society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Part 1 (Academic)
6.0

Sample Essay with Corrections

In today's world, the usage of public transportations are is becoming increasingly popular. There isare some people who believe that taking public transport is more better than driving a car, both for peopleindividuals and society overall. In my opinion, I am agree with this view to a large extent. Firstly, using public transportations can hasve many benefits for individuals. When we take the bus or train, we don't need to focus on the road and can instead relax, read, or do working. This can makes our commute time more productive and less stressful. Additionally, public transportsation is usually cheaper than owning and maintaining a car. This extra money can be usinged for other things like food or entertainment. Secondly, public transportation is much better for societaly as a whole. When more people take buses and trains, there is lessare fewer cars on the road. This leads to reduced traffic congestion and traffic jams, which saves everyone's time. More importantly, fewer cars mean lower air pollutions and greenhouse gas emissions. This has a major positive impacts on the environment and helps to combating climate change. Public transport also encourages walking and and makes cities more livable and walkable. In conclusion, iI strongly agree that using public transportations has significant advantages over driving cars for both individuals persons and society overall. Not only does it save money and reduce stress for people, but it also has critically environmental and social benefits. Governments should continue investing in public transportation infrastructure to encouraginge more citizens to make the switch.
DeletedOriginal textAddedCorrected text

Expert Feedback

The essay effectively addresses the prompt and presents a clear opinion on the benefits of public transportation over driving, which is a key strength. The structure is generally sound, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, critical areas for improvement include grammatical accuracy, particularly with subject-verb agreement and verb forms, as well as the use of more varied vocabulary to avoid repetition. The structural changes made include correcting grammatical errors, improving coherence by adjusting awkward phrases, and ensuring proper subject-verb agreement. Suggestions for further improvements not implemented in the corrected version include providing specific examples of situations where driving might be more advantageous, which would create a more balanced discussion. The tone used is appropriate for an academic essay, maintaining a formal and persuasive style throughout.

Detailed Scores

Coherence And Cohesion
The essay is generally coherent, with a logical flow of ideas. However, some sentences are awkwardly constructed, which affects clarity. For example, 'This can makes our commute time more productive' should be 'This can make our commute time more productive.' Additionally, the use of cohesive devices could be improved to enhance the overall flow, such as using 'Furthermore' or 'Moreover' to connect ideas more effectively.
6.0
Grammatical Range And Accuracy
The essay contains several grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('usage of public transportations are becoming') and incorrect verb forms ('can has,' 'is usually cheaper'). These errors detract from the overall clarity and professionalism of the writing. To improve, the writer should focus on ensuring subject-verb agreement and using correct verb forms consistently.
5.5
Lexical Resource
The vocabulary used is appropriate for the topic, but there are instances of repetition and awkward phrasing, such as 'public transportations' (should be 'public transportation') and 'more better' (should be 'better'). To improve, the writer could incorporate a wider range of vocabulary and idiomatic expressions, such as 'public transit' or 'commuting options.'
6.0
Task Achievement
The essay addresses the prompt and presents a clear opinion on the benefits of public transportation over driving. However, it could be improved by providing more specific examples and a more balanced discussion of potential drawbacks. For instance, mentioning situations where driving might be more advantageous could enhance the argument.
6.5

Related Writing Samples

Part 1 (Academic)
8.0

You eat at your college cafeteria every lunch time. However, you think it needs some improvements. Write a letter to the college magazine. In your letter, explain what you like about the cafeteria say what is wrong with it suggest how it could be improved

Part 1 (Academic)
6.5

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
6.0

The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

"Violence in playgrounds is increasing. However, it is important that parents should teach children not to hit back at bullies."