Schools should use films, computers and games instead of books. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Essay with Corrections
Expert Feedback
The essay presents a clear position and addresses the prompt effectively, demonstrating a good understanding of the topic. Key strengths include a logical structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, as well as a clear argument that partially disagrees with the idea of replacing books with technology. However, critical areas for improvement include the need for more thorough development of ideas, with specific examples to support arguments, and a greater variety of cohesive devices to enhance the flow of the essay. Structural changes made include correcting grammatical errors, improving coherence with better transitions, and refining vocabulary to reduce repetition and spelling mistakes. Suggestions for further improvements not implemented in the corrected version include incorporating specific examples of subjects where technology enhances learning and varying sentence structures to improve grammatical range. The tone used is appropriate for an academic essay, maintaining a formal and objective style throughout.
Detailed Scores
What this means:
The essay has a logical structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, the use of cohesive devices is somewhat limited, and transitions between ideas could be smoother. For example, phrases like 'Firstly' and 'Secondly' are used, but more varied linking words could enhance the flow. Improving the connection between sentences and ideas would increase coherence.
How to improve:
- Use a clear paragraph structure
- Connect ideas with appropriate linking words
- Maintain logical progression
- Use referencing effectively
What this means:
The essay contains several grammatical errors, including subject-verb agreement issues (e.g., 'books are most tradition method'), incorrect verb forms (e.g., 'demonstrat', 'solveing'), and punctuation errors (e.g., missing commas). While the overall meaning is clear, these errors affect the clarity and professionalism of the writing. A greater variety of sentence structures and improved accuracy would enhance this score.
How to improve:
- Use complex sentence structures
- Maintain grammatical accuracy
- Use a variety of sentence patterns
- Check for common grammar errors
What this means:
The vocabulary used is generally appropriate, but there are several spelling errors (e.g., 'peaple', 'compyuters', 'importent', 'definitly', 'generatien') that detract from the overall quality. While some sophisticated terms are present, the repetition of words like 'books' and 'technology' could be reduced by using synonyms or paraphrasing. Expanding the range of vocabulary would improve this score.
How to improve:
- Use a wider range of vocabulary
- Demonstrate awareness of collocations
- Avoid word repetition
- Use more sophisticated vocabulary accurately
What this means:
The essay addresses the prompt by presenting a clear position that partially disagrees with the idea of replacing books with films, computers, and games. However, the development of ideas could be more thorough, with more specific examples to support the arguments. For instance, mentioning specific subjects where technology enhances learning could strengthen the argument. Additionally, the conclusion could be more definitive in summarizing the main points.
How to improve:
- Address all parts of the task fully
- Support ideas with specific examples
- Develop each point thoroughly
- Stay relevant to the topic
Related Writing Samples
Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on individuals and society. To what extent do you agree?
Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
We have become a disposable society, preferring to buy new products rather than fixing existing items. What are the causes of this trend and what are the possible solutions?
The tendency that news reports in media focus on problems and emergencies rather than on positive developments is harmful for individuals and the society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Today single-use products are still very common. Why is this? What are the problems associated with this?
In the future, more people will choose to go on holiday in their own country and not travel abroad on holiday. Do you agree or disagree?