Social media in politics You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: Social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram are now widely used by politicians and political parties to spread their message and connect with voters. Do the advantages of social media use in politics outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

Part 2
5.5

Sample Essay with Corrections

These days, social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter are very commonly used by politicians and political partyies. They are using it foruse these platforms to spread their messages toand connect to withe voters. In my opinions, there isare both advantages and disadvantage ofs to using social media in politics, but I beliefve there are more advantages than disadvantages. The first advantage is that politicians can reach very huge amountsa vast number of people very fastquickly through social media. In the past days, if a politician wantsed to talk to the public, they needsed to go and give speeches in many various places. It taken so much time. But now, he just posts hisdifferent places, which took a lot of time. However, now they can simply post their ideas online ion Twitter or Facebook, and instaneously manytly, many peoples can see it. Another advantage it iss that politicians can target exact peoples who willspecific individuals who are likely to vote for hithem. IOn Facebook, for example, you can choose who you want your message gto to, onlyreach, targeting peoples in specific locations and ages for examples. So groups. This is a very powerful way to campaign. But However, we cannot forget about some dangers of using social media in politic tos as well. One danger is that misinformation can spread very easilly and quicklly through social mediathese platforms. If a politician posts something that is not true, it may be seen by millions of peoples who beliefve it without thinkings. And critically. Additionally, peoples who disagree with the politician can also replyspread false informations. So much potential for public to become confused by this way. O, leading to confusion among the public. Another disadvantage, I beliefve, is that politicians cannot haveestablish real connections with voters solely through social media only. If they only post messages online but never meet peoples face by -to-face, the publics might not feel emotionally connected to hithem. They feel he is far away and not care about themsmay perceive the politician as distant and uncaring. Direct human interaction is still important I thing., in my opinion. In conclusions, while social media in politics haves some dangers like, such as the spread of fake news and voter confusion voter, I beliefve overrall it haves more advantages thean disdadvantages. AThe ability to reach so many peoples so fastquickly and efficiently is hugea significant power for politicians. But still,However, I think that combining it with traditional waymethods of meeting voters in persons is the best I thingapproach.
DeletedOriginal textAddedCorrected text

Expert Feedback

The essay demonstrates a clear understanding of the topic and presents both advantages and disadvantages of social media in politics. Key strengths include a logical structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, as well as a clear expression of personal opinion. Critical areas for improvement include enhancing the development of ideas with specific examples, improving coherence through better transitions, and addressing grammatical errors and spelling mistakes. The revised version has corrected many of these issues, including awkward phrasing and spelling errors, while also improving the flow of ideas between paragraphs. Suggestions for further improvements not implemented in the corrected version include providing specific examples of politicians who have effectively used social media or instances where misinformation has caused significant issues. Additionally, varying vocabulary further could enhance the lexical resource. The tone used is appropriate for an academic essay, maintaining a formal and analytical style throughout.

Detailed Scores

Coherence And Cohesion
The essay has a basic structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, the flow of ideas is occasionally disrupted by awkward phrasing and a lack of clear transitions between points. To enhance coherence, the writer could use more cohesive devices and ensure that each paragraph logically follows from the previous one.
5.5
Grammatical Range And Accuracy
The essay contains several grammatical errors, including subject-verb agreement issues and awkward sentence structures (e.g., 'it for spread their messages'). While the meaning is generally clear, these errors affect the overall clarity. To improve, the writer should focus on using correct grammatical structures and varying sentence types to enhance complexity.
5.0
Lexical Resource
The vocabulary used is generally appropriate, but there are several instances of repetition (e.g., 'politician', 'peoples', 'advantage', 'disadvantage'). Additionally, there are some spelling errors (e.g., 'politic', 'easilly', 'thinkings') that detract from the overall quality. To improve, the writer should aim to use a wider range of vocabulary and check for spelling accuracy.
5.0
Task Achievement
The essay addresses the prompt by discussing both the advantages and disadvantages of social media in politics. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited, and the arguments could be more thoroughly supported with examples. For improvement, the writer could provide specific examples of politicians who have successfully used social media or instances where misinformation has caused issues.
6.0

Related Writing Samples

Part 2
5.0

Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on individuals and society. To what extent do you agree?

Part 2
6.5

Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Part 2
8.0

We have become a disposable society, preferring to buy new products rather than fixing existing items. What are the causes of this trend and what are the possible solutions?

Part 2
5.5

The tendency that news reports in media focus on problems and emergencies rather than on positive developments is harmful for individuals and the society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Part 2
7.0

Today single-use products are still very common. Why is this? What are the problems associated with this?

Part 2
6.5

In the future, more people will choose to go on holiday in their own country and not travel abroad on holiday. Do you agree or disagree?