Some people believe that it's a waste of money for the government to allocate funds on space biomedicine. Do you agree?

Part 1 (Academic)
5.5

Sample Essay with Corrections

In my opinion, space medicine is not a waste of money for governments to spend on. There are someeveral reasons why I beliefve this. Firstly, investeing in space biomediceine can bring beniefits for human health. Studies in space using new technologies cean help scienteists to understand dieseases and develop new treatments. For example, research in micrograveity environments has already led to breakthroughs in drug delivery systems and tissue engineering. These discoveries have the potential to improve healthcare here on Earth, which is a good use of publeic funds. In addition, space biomedeicine can have spin-off benefits for other industries. The technologies and materials developed for space mediceal research can also be applied in other sectors, such as aviation, automotive, and consumer goods. This can create new business opportunities and stimulate economic growth, which is another reason why government investment in this field is justified. Of course, it is importeant for governments to prioritizse spending and ensure that funds are allocated to areas with the greatest need and impact. However, I believe that space biomediceine deserves a place in the budget due to its potential to advance human knowledge, improve public health, and drive innovsation across multiple sectors. In conclusion, while there may be other pressing priorities for government spending, I do not agree that investing in space biomedicine is a waste of money. The beniefits for human health and economic development make it a worthwhile area for public funding.
DeletedOriginal textAddedCorrected text

Expert Feedback

The essay presents a clear opinion that investing in space biomedicine is beneficial, supported by relevant reasons and examples. Key strengths include a logical structure with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. However, critical areas for improvement include addressing spelling and grammatical errors, which significantly detract from the overall impression. The use of cohesive devices is somewhat limited, and the essay would benefit from a wider range of linking words to enhance the flow between ideas. Structural changes made include correcting spelling and grammatical errors, as well as improving the clarity of sentences. Suggestions for further improvements not implemented include elaborating on specific benefits of space biomedicine and incorporating counterarguments to strengthen the position. The tone used is appropriate for an academic essay, maintaining a formal and persuasive style throughout.

Detailed Scores

Coherence And Cohesion
The essay has a logical structure, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. However, the use of cohesive devices is somewhat limited, and some transitions between ideas could be smoother. For example, phrases like 'In addition' and 'However' are used, but more varied linking words could enhance the flow. To improve, the writer should focus on using a wider range of cohesive devices to connect ideas more effectively.
5.5
Grammatical Range And Accuracy
The essay demonstrates a basic range of grammatical structures, but there are numerous grammatical errors, including subject-verb agreement and incorrect verb forms (e.g., 'goverments' should be 'governments', 'investng' should be 'investing'). These errors detract from the clarity of the writing. To improve, the writer should proofread for grammatical accuracy and aim to use a wider variety of sentence structures.
5.0
Lexical Resource
The vocabulary used in the essay is generally appropriate, but there are several spelling errors (e.g., 'opnion', 'spce', 'wast', 'mony', 'benifits', 'helth', 'investeng', 'diese', 'trtments', 'exmple', 'microgravety', 'alredy', 'breakthrohs', 'tissu', 'publec', 'technologes', 'medicel', 'aplied', 'automotiv', 'busness', 'ecnomics', 'importent', 'ensur', 'allocatd', 'potentil', 'knowledg', 'innovstion', 'conclusin', 'pressin', 'spnding', 'worthwhil'). This affects the overall impression of the writing. To improve, the writer should focus on spelling accuracy and consider using more sophisticated vocabulary to enhance the essay.
5.0
Task Achievement
The essay addresses the prompt by presenting a clear opinion that investing in space biomedicine is not a waste of money. It provides relevant reasons and examples to support this viewpoint. However, the argument could be more effectively developed with additional details or counterarguments to strengthen the position. For improvement, the writer could elaborate on the specific benefits of space biomedicine and provide more concrete examples.
6.0

Related Writing Samples

Part 1 (Academic)
8.0

You eat at your college cafeteria every lunch time. However, you think it needs some improvements. Write a letter to the college magazine. In your letter, explain what you like about the cafeteria say what is wrong with it suggest how it could be improved

Part 1 (Academic)
6.5

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
6.0

The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

"Violence in playgrounds is increasing. However, it is important that parents should teach children not to hit back at bullies."