The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

Sample Essay with Corrections

The graph is representings the househole numbr innumber of households in the US by their yearannual income in 2007, 2011, and 2015. It can be clearly saween that the households with an income under $15,000 were the most in amountnumerous for all the years givien. In 2007, the under 15,000 income households number werenumber of households earning under $15,000 was around 15 million, which is significantly higher than that of other income group significantlys. For the middle-income group of $35,000 to $49,999, the number of household weres remaininged relatively stable at about 12 million over the 3 three-years period. It is noticeable that only the under $15,000 and the $100,000 and over group haves increased from 2007 to 2015. The under 15,000 income householdnumber of households earning under $15,000 reached 16 million in 2011, then faelled slightly to around 15.5 million in 2015. In conclusoion, thehouseholds earning under $15,000 income households is the most inwere the most prevalent in the US for all years,: 2007, 2011, and 2015. Most income groups' household number stays remained stable during the period, with only the under $15,000 and $100,000 and over groups increasing in the number of households.
DeletedOriginal textAddedCorrected text

Expert Feedback

The essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the task, effectively summarizing the main features of the graph. Key strengths include a clear identification of the most significant income group and a reasonable attempt to describe trends over the years. However, critical areas for improvement include a deeper analysis of all income groups, clearer transitions between ideas, and correction of spelling and grammatical errors. Structural changes made include correcting awkward phrasing and ensuring proper subject-verb agreement. Suggestions for further improvements not implemented in the corrected version include providing more detailed comparisons among all income brackets and enhancing vocabulary range. The tone used is appropriate for an academic task, maintaining a formal and objective style.

Detailed Scores

Coherence And Cohesion
The essay has a basic structure and some logical flow, but it suffers from awkward phrasing and unclear transitions. For example, phrases like 'the most in amount' and 'the number of household were remaining' disrupt the clarity. To enhance coherence, the writer should use clearer linking words and phrases to connect ideas more effectively.
5.5
Grammatical Range And Accuracy
The writing demonstrates some grammatical range, but there are multiple errors in subject-verb agreement and sentence structure (e.g., 'the number of household were remaining', 'the under 15,000 income household reached'). These errors affect clarity and accuracy. To improve, the writer should focus on grammatical accuracy and vary sentence structures more effectively.
5.0
Lexical Resource
The vocabulary used is generally appropriate, but there are several spelling errors (e.g., 'househole', 'incom', 'relativly', 'noticeble', 'falled', 'conclusoin', 'yars') that detract from the overall quality. The writer should aim to use a wider range of vocabulary and ensure correct spelling to improve this score.
5.0
Task Achievement
The response addresses the task by summarizing the main features of the chart and making some comparisons. However, it lacks depth in analysis and does not fully explore the trends for all income groups. To improve, the writer should provide more detailed comparisons and insights into the data, such as discussing the changes in other income brackets.
5.0

Related Writing Samples

Part 1 (Academic)
8.0

You eat at your college cafeteria every lunch time. However, you think it needs some improvements. Write a letter to the college magazine. In your letter, explain what you like about the cafeteria say what is wrong with it suggest how it could be improved

Part 1 (Academic)
6.5

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
6.0

The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

"Violence in playgrounds is increasing. However, it is important that parents should teach children not to hit back at bullies."