The charts show the sources of electricity production in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
6.0

Sample Essay with Corrections

The chart showingillustrates the sources of electricity producingtion in four countryies between the years 2003 and 2008. It is clear that the use of coal asfor power generation in all countries, except France, has declined over that period by around 25% to 50% in Britiain and the USA respectively. However, the use of gas, which was the dominant source for the first 3three countryies in 2003, has increased over 5the five-year period to around 30% to 50% in Germany and Britain respectively. The USA also seeaw a rise in gas-powered generation from about 15% in 2003 to more thean 20% in 2008. ForThe use of nuclear power has not changed much, except in France, which experieneced a slightly increase in that source over the period. Alsodditionally, hydraulic power production stayingremained almost the same throughout the years, with some fluctuations in Britain and the USA, while Germany and France maintained steady levels at around 5% and 10% respectively. In conclusion, although coal-powered generation declined in the majority of countries, it still remains a major electricity source for thoseall except France. Gas-powered generation riose in all four countries, but most significantly in Britain and Germany. Nuclear and hydraulic sources stayinged relatively constant, except for small changes in some countryies.
DeletedOriginal textAddedCorrected text

Expert Feedback

The essay effectively summarizes the main features of the chart and makes relevant comparisons, which is a key strength. However, it lacks clarity in certain areas, particularly in the introduction, where it could specify that the data is from four countries. The coherence and cohesion of the essay are generally good, but some awkward constructions affect clarity. The vocabulary is appropriate, but there are instances of repetition and inaccuracies that could be improved with more varied language. The grammatical range is basic, with several errors that detract from clarity. The structural changes made include correcting grammatical errors, improving clarity in phrasing, and enhancing transitions between ideas. For further improvement, the writer could focus on using more sophisticated vocabulary and complex sentence structures. The tone used is appropriate for an academic task, maintaining a formal and informative style.

Detailed Scores

Coherence And Cohesion
The essay is generally coherent, with a logical flow of ideas. However, some sentences are awkwardly constructed, which affects the overall clarity. For instance, phrases like 'the use coal as power generation' should be revised to 'the use of coal for power generation.' The use of cohesive devices is present but could be improved for better transitions between ideas.
6.5
Grammatical Range And Accuracy
The writing demonstrates a basic range of grammatical structures, but there are several grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement ('has decline' should be 'has declined') and incorrect prepositions ('in four country' should be 'in four countries'). These errors detract from the overall clarity and accuracy of the writing. More complex sentence structures could also be employed to demonstrate a higher level of grammatical range.
5.5
Lexical Resource
The vocabulary used is appropriate for the task, but there are instances of repetition, such as 'power generation' and 'source.' More varied vocabulary could enhance the writing. Additionally, there are some inaccuracies, such as 'experiene' instead of 'experience' and 'more then' instead of 'more than.' Using synonyms and more sophisticated expressions would improve the score.
6.0
Task Achievement
The response addresses the task by summarizing the main features of the charts and making relevant comparisons. However, it lacks clarity in some areas and could benefit from more precise data representation. For example, stating specific percentages for each country would enhance the response. Additionally, the introduction could be clearer by specifying that the data is from four countries.
6.0

Related Writing Samples

Part 1 (Academic)
8.0

You eat at your college cafeteria every lunch time. However, you think it needs some improvements. Write a letter to the college magazine. In your letter, explain what you like about the cafeteria say what is wrong with it suggest how it could be improved

Part 1 (Academic)
6.5

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
6.0

The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

"Violence in playgrounds is increasing. However, it is important that parents should teach children not to hit back at bullies."