The given bar chart illustrates health expense as percentage of GDP for twelve European countries in a period of three years which are 2002, 2007 as well as 2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
6.5

Sample Essay with Corrections

The bar chart givingillustrates the percentage of GDP spending fort on health in 12 eEuropean countries over 3three years,: 2002, 2007, and 2012. We can see clearly that over the course of the 3 years, from the 12 countries in europe, Switzerland hadIt is evident that throughout these three years, Switzerland consistently had the higherst percentages for their GDP spending on of GDP allocated to health, atreaching 11%. OIn the other side, Estonia has lower acontrast, Estonia recorded the lowest percentage at just 3%. Interestingly, the GDP percentage for health spending in 4 regions which include four countries—Belgium, Estonia, Spain, and Switzerland being exact same in the 3 years. Furthermore, for the GDP percentage spent on health in—remained the same across all three years. Furthermore, Denmark, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, Slovenia, and Luxembourg, they were same in 2002 and 2007, and higher in 2012. Luxembourg had a same situation but their exhibited identical GDP percentages for health in 2002 and 2007, with an increase noted in 2012. Luxembourg experienced a similar trend, but its GDP percentage in 2012 was the lowest. In a among these countries. Additionally, the GDP percentage in the Netherlands growingshowed consistent growth each year, whereasile France's spending increased from 2002 to 2007, but then dropped by 1% in 2012. In conclusion, most European countries hallocated more than 5 percent of% of their GDP forto health spending in all 3three years, butwith the notable exception of Estonia, which did not meet this threshold.
DeletedOriginal textAddedCorrected text

Expert Feedback

The essay effectively addresses the task by summarizing the main features of the bar chart and making relevant comparisons. Key strengths include a clear identification of the highest and lowest spending countries and the mention of trends over the years. However, critical areas for improvement include enhancing clarity in data presentation and providing more specific insights into overall trends. Structural changes made include clearer topic sentences and improved transitions between paragraphs to enhance coherence. Suggestions for further improvements not implemented in the corrected version include varying vocabulary to avoid repetition and correcting grammatical errors for better accuracy. The tone used is appropriate for an academic context, maintaining a formal and informative style.

Detailed Scores

Coherence And Cohesion
The essay has a logical structure, but some sentences could be better linked to enhance the flow of ideas. For instance, the transition between discussing specific countries and general trends could be smoother. Using more cohesive devices, such as 'in contrast' or 'similarly,' would improve coherence. Additionally, the use of paragraphs could help organize the information more clearly.
6.5
Grammatical Range And Accuracy
The writing demonstrates a reasonable range of grammatical structures, but there are several grammatical errors and awkward constructions, such as 'had higher percentages for their GDP spending on health' and 'being exact same.' These issues affect clarity and accuracy. To improve, the writer should focus on sentence structure and ensure subject-verb agreement, as well as the correct use of articles.
6.0
Lexical Resource
The vocabulary used is generally appropriate for the task, with terms like 'GDP spending' and 'health expenditure.' However, there are some repetitive phrases, such as 'GDP percentage' and 'health spending,' which could be varied. To enhance the lexical resource, the writer could incorporate synonyms or more sophisticated expressions related to economic terms.
7.0
Task Achievement
The response addresses the task by summarizing the main features of the bar chart and making relevant comparisons. However, it lacks some clarity in presenting the data, and the conclusion could be more specific regarding the overall trends observed. To improve, the writer could provide more detailed comparisons and insights into the trends for each country.
7.0

Related Writing Samples

Part 1 (Academic)
8.0

You eat at your college cafeteria every lunch time. However, you think it needs some improvements. Write a letter to the college magazine. In your letter, explain what you like about the cafeteria say what is wrong with it suggest how it could be improved

Part 1 (Academic)
6.5

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
6.0

The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

"Violence in playgrounds is increasing. However, it is important that parents should teach children not to hit back at bullies."