The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.

Part 1 (Academic)
6.0

Sample Essay with Corrections

The graph is showingllustrates data about the recycleing of four types of materials duringover the period from 1982 until 2010 yearto 2010 in one country. InAt the beginning of the period, the paper havd the highest level of recycling, at around 20%. Glass iswas the second highest recycled material, followed by metal. Plastic is, while plastic had the lowest rate, almost 0%. Over the years, recycling increased for all materials. Paper remained the most recycled andmaterial, reaching around 70% by endingthe end of the period. Glass and metal also growthew, but not as much likesignificantly as paper. InBy 2010, glass iwas recycled at 50%, and metal iwas around 35%. M The most bsig change is happennificant change occurred for plastic. It started from virtually nothing and increased very fastrapidly. By 2010, plastic recycling is catchcaught up to metal at, reaching about 35%. In conclusion, the graph demonstrates the rise ofin recycling during this time for all four materials in the country. Paper is always during this time. Paper was consistently the most recycled material, but plastic has fast increasing and reachexperienced rapid growth, reaching the same level as metal inby the end of the period. Overall, ithis trend is a positive trend forfor the environment.
DeletedOriginal textAddedCorrected text

Expert Feedback

The essay effectively summarizes the key trends in recycling for the four materials over the specified period, which is a key strength. However, it lacks some detail and clarity in presenting the data, particularly in terms of specific figures and comparisons. The structure is logical, with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion, but the use of cohesive devices could be improved to enhance the flow of ideas. The vocabulary is generally appropriate, but there are instances of repetition and awkward phrasing that could be varied for better lexical resource. Additionally, grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement and awkward constructions, detract from the overall quality. The corrected version addresses these issues by improving grammatical accuracy, enhancing vocabulary variety, and providing clearer comparisons. For further improvement, the writer could incorporate more sophisticated vocabulary related to recycling and environmental topics, as well as ensure a more varied use of cohesive devices. The tone used is appropriate for an academic context.

Detailed Scores

Coherence And Cohesion
The essay has a logical structure, with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. However, the use of cohesive devices is somewhat limited, and some sentences could be better linked for improved flow. For example, using phrases like 'In contrast' or 'Additionally' could enhance the connections between ideas.
6.0
Grammatical Range And Accuracy
The writing contains several grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement ('the paper have' should be 'the paper has') and awkward constructions ('is showing data about recycle'). While the meaning is generally clear, these errors detract from the overall quality. To improve, the writer should focus on sentence structure and grammatical accuracy, ensuring subject-verb agreement and proper tense usage.
5.5
Lexical Resource
The vocabulary used is generally appropriate, but there are instances of repetition (e.g., 'recycling' and 'recycled'). The use of phrases like 'most recycled' and 'fast increasing' could be varied with synonyms or more sophisticated expressions. To improve, the writer could incorporate a wider range of vocabulary related to recycling and environmental topics.
6.0
Task Achievement
The response addresses the task by summarizing the key trends in recycling for the four materials over the specified period. However, it lacks some detail and clarity in presenting the data, such as specific figures and comparisons. To improve, the writer could include more precise data points and clearer comparisons between the materials.
6.0

Related Writing Samples

Part 1 (Academic)
8.0

You eat at your college cafeteria every lunch time. However, you think it needs some improvements. Write a letter to the college magazine. In your letter, explain what you like about the cafeteria say what is wrong with it suggest how it could be improved

Part 1 (Academic)
6.5

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
6.0

The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

"Violence in playgrounds is increasing. However, it is important that parents should teach children not to hit back at bullies."