The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Sample Essay with Corrections
Expert Feedback
The essay effectively addresses the prompt, clearly expressing a strong agreement with the idea that the main aim of science should be to improve people's lives. Key strengths include relevant examples from medical science and clean energy, which support the argument well. The structure is generally clear, with each paragraph focusing on a specific point, and the use of cohesive devices aids in linking ideas. However, there are critical areas for improvement. The essay could benefit from a more structured acknowledgment of the opposing viewpoint, which would enhance the balance of the argument. Additionally, there is some repetition of vocabulary, particularly the words 'science' and 'people', which could be varied to demonstrate a wider lexical range. Minor grammatical errors, such as 'making people's life better' (should be 'lives'), should also be addressed for greater accuracy. The structural changes made include correcting grammatical errors, enhancing vocabulary variety, and improving transitions between ideas. Suggestions for further improvements not implemented in the corrected version include incorporating more complex sentence structures and varying the use of synonyms to enrich the lexical resource. The tone used is appropriate for an academic essay, maintaining a formal and persuasive style throughout.
Detailed Scores
What this means:
The essay is well-organized, with a clear progression of ideas. Each paragraph focuses on a specific point, and the use of cohesive devices (e.g., 'for example', 'another point I want to make') effectively links the ideas. To further improve coherence, the writer could use more varied transitional phrases to enhance the flow between paragraphs.
How to improve:
- Use a clear paragraph structure
- Connect ideas with appropriate linking words
- Maintain logical progression
- Use referencing effectively
What this means:
The essay demonstrates a good range of grammatical structures, with mostly accurate usage. There are minor errors, such as 'making people's life better' (should be 'lives') and some awkward phrasing, but these do not significantly impede understanding. To achieve a higher score, the writer should aim for more complex sentence structures and ensure grammatical accuracy throughout.
How to improve:
- Use complex sentence structures
- Maintain grammatical accuracy
- Use a variety of sentence patterns
- Check for common grammar errors
What this means:
The vocabulary used is generally appropriate and conveys the intended meaning effectively. Phrases like 'big difference', 'important changes', and 'real problems' are clear and relevant. However, there is some repetition of words such as 'science' and 'people', which could be varied with synonyms or paraphrasing to demonstrate a wider lexical range.
How to improve:
- Use a wider range of vocabulary
- Demonstrate awareness of collocations
- Avoid word repetition
- Use more sophisticated vocabulary accurately
What this means:
The essay clearly addresses the prompt by expressing a strong agreement with the statement that the main aim of science should be to improve people's lives. It provides relevant examples, such as advancements in medical science and clean energy, to support the argument. However, the essay could be improved by briefly acknowledging the opposing viewpoint in a more structured manner, which would enhance the overall balance of the argument.
How to improve:
- Address all parts of the task fully
- Support ideas with specific examples
- Develop each point thoroughly
- Stay relevant to the topic
Related Writing Samples
You eat at your college cafeteria every lunch time. However, you think it needs some improvements. Write a letter to the college magazine. In your letter, explain what you like about the cafeteria say what is wrong with it suggest how it could be improved
The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010.
The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.
"Violence in playgrounds is increasing. However, it is important that parents should teach children not to hit back at bullies."