The pie charts show the source of electricity in 2000 and 2014 in the UK. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
6.5

Sample Essay with Corrections

The two pie charts is showing from where the the sources of electricity in the UK come from infor the years 2000 and 2014. PThe pie chart haves illustrate a total of 8eight different sources like, including coal, natural gas, nuclear, and other sources. Overall, it can be seen that natural gas was the most used source of the electricity in both years which is shown. In the 2000, natural gas and coal iswere the two main contributor ins to electricity generation, with theshares of 39.93% and 34.13% shares respectively. WMeanwhile, nuclear energy was provided 21.65% of the total, and renewable sources only generated only 3% in 2000 year. 2014 has seen a. By 2014, there was a notable change in shares, with natural gas is now bigbecoming the largest contributor at 49.76% and, while coal's share faell to below 25%. Nuclear remains mostly sameenergy remained relatively stable, but renewable sources increased to 15% from 3% 14 years ago. Sjust 3% fourteen years earlier. The share of other sources in the 2014 pie chart has also decreased fromcompared to 2000. To summarise, UK relies heavily for electricitythe UK heavily relies on natural gas and coal for electricity, but over the years, coal usage get reduced whilehas decreased while the portions of natural gas and renewable portionsources hasve increased.
DeletedOriginal textAddedCorrected text

Expert Feedback

The essay effectively addresses the task by summarizing the main features of the pie charts and making relevant comparisons between the years 2000 and 2014. Key strengths include a clear identification of the main sources of electricity and a logical structure. However, critical areas for improvement include grammatical accuracy, particularly with subject-verb agreement and article usage, as well as enhancing coherence through clearer transitions and varied vocabulary. Structural changes made include correcting grammatical errors, improving clarity in sentence construction, and ensuring proper subject-verb agreement. For further improvements, the writer could focus on reducing repetition of terms and incorporating more sophisticated vocabulary and idiomatic expressions. The tone used is appropriate for an academic task, maintaining a formal and informative style.

Detailed Scores

Coherence And Cohesion
The essay has a logical structure, but the flow of ideas could be improved. Some sentences are awkwardly constructed, which affects the overall coherence. For example, 'which is shown' is vague and could be omitted for clarity. The use of cohesive devices is present but could be more varied. To enhance coherence, the writer should focus on clearer transitions between points and ensure that each idea logically follows the previous one.
6.0
Grammatical Range And Accuracy
The writing demonstrates a reasonable range of grammatical structures, but there are several grammatical errors that affect clarity, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('is showing' should be 'shows') and incorrect article usage ('the electricity in the UK come from' should be 'comes from'). While the overall meaning is conveyed, these errors detract from the overall accuracy. To improve, the writer should focus on proofreading for grammatical correctness and ensuring subject-verb agreement.
6.0
Lexical Resource
The vocabulary used is generally appropriate for the task, with terms like 'contributor,' 'generate,' and 'rely heavily' demonstrating a good range. However, there are instances of repetition (e.g., 'source' and 'electricity') and some awkward phrases (e.g., 'is showing from where the electricity...'). To improve, the writer could incorporate more varied vocabulary and idiomatic expressions to enhance the sophistication of the language.
6.5
Task Achievement
The response addresses the task by summarizing the main features of the pie charts and making relevant comparisons between the years 2000 and 2014. However, it lacks some clarity in presenting the data, and there are minor inaccuracies in the figures mentioned (e.g., 'natural gas and coal is two main contributor' should be 'are two main contributors'). To improve, the writer could ensure that all data is accurately represented and clearly articulated.
6.5

Related Writing Samples

Part 1 (Academic)
8.0

You eat at your college cafeteria every lunch time. However, you think it needs some improvements. Write a letter to the college magazine. In your letter, explain what you like about the cafeteria say what is wrong with it suggest how it could be improved

Part 1 (Academic)
6.5

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
6.0

The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

"Violence in playgrounds is increasing. However, it is important that parents should teach children not to hit back at bullies."