The two plans below compare the layout of a typical Japanese office and a typical American office. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.5

Sample Essay with Corrections

The graphs is showing 2 two different office floor plans, one from Japan and the other one from the United States. There isare some similarities between the offices, but there are also some difference also. In the bs. Both plans havinclude managers' rooms and cubicles for staff. MThe managers' rooms are located in the corner and take up more area compared to a single cubicule. The Japanese office have 3s three managers' rooms, whereas the American office has just having one. Another shared feature is the reception, that area, which is present in both plans onat the entrance of the office space. The reception area in the American office seeming more bigs larger than the Japanese reception are.a. Some differrences in the plans are obvious,; for example, the placement of cubuicles. Cubicles are arranged in straight rows in the American office, but in the Japanese layout, the cubicles put in groupsare grouped together. Another major difference is the presence of meeting rooms &and common spaces. The American office contains a special room for meetings and a common area for breaks, which the Japanese office does not show this features at all. Also,dditionally, the supply room appears only in the Japanese office and does not exist in the American office. In conclutsion, althought the general layout of the offices haves some common traits like managers' rooms, reception areas, and staff cubicles, there is bigare significant differences in the placement &and arrangement of thisese elements, and alsos well as extra rooms that are only available in one layout depending on the country.
DeletedOriginal textAddedCorrected text

Expert Feedback

The essay demonstrates a clear attempt to compare the two office layouts, which is a key strength. The introduction effectively paraphrases the task, and the body paragraphs provide relevant details about similarities and differences. However, critical areas for improvement include addressing spelling errors, enhancing coherence through better transitions, and improving grammatical accuracy. Structural changes made include correcting grammatical errors, improving the flow of ideas, and ensuring proper pluralization and punctuation. Suggestions for further improvements not implemented in the corrected version include varying vocabulary to avoid repetition and providing a more in-depth analysis of the features. The tone used is appropriate for an academic task, maintaining a formal and objective style.

Detailed Scores

Coherence And Cohesion
The essay presents ideas in a somewhat logical order, but the flow is hindered by awkward phrasing and some unclear transitions. For example, phrases like 'Another shared feature is reception' could be better linked to the previous sentence. To improve coherence, the writer should use more cohesive devices and ensure that each paragraph has a clear main idea.
5.5
Grammatical Range And Accuracy
The writing demonstrates a basic range of grammatical structures, but there are frequent errors in sentence construction and subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'The graphs is showing', 'American office just having one'). These errors affect clarity and accuracy. To improve, the writer should focus on proofreading for grammatical mistakes and varying sentence structures.
5.0
Lexical Resource
The vocabulary used is generally appropriate, but there are several spelling errors (e.g., 'diferent', 'cubicule', 'seeming', 'diferrences') that detract from the overall quality. Additionally, the use of phrases like 'some similarities' and 'some differences' is repetitive. To enhance lexical resource, the writer should aim for more varied vocabulary and correct spelling.
5.0
Task Achievement
The response addresses the task by comparing the two office layouts and highlighting similarities and differences. However, it lacks depth in analysis and could benefit from clearer organization of information. For improvement, the writer should focus on providing a more structured overview of the main features and ensure that comparisons are more explicitly stated.
6.0

Related Writing Samples

Part 1 (Academic)
8.0

You eat at your college cafeteria every lunch time. However, you think it needs some improvements. Write a letter to the college magazine. In your letter, explain what you like about the cafeteria say what is wrong with it suggest how it could be improved

Part 1 (Academic)
6.5

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
6.0

The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

"Violence in playgrounds is increasing. However, it is important that parents should teach children not to hit back at bullies."