Wild animals are becoming scarce these days. Why do you think this is happening? What can be done to solve this problem?
Sample Essay with Corrections
Expert Feedback
The essay effectively addresses the prompt by identifying key reasons for the decline in wild animal populations and proposing relevant solutions. Key strengths include a clear structure, logical progression of ideas, and well-developed arguments supported by specific examples. However, there are critical areas for improvement, such as incorporating more varied linking phrases to enhance coherence and using synonyms to reduce repetition of phrases like 'wild animals' and 'illegal hunting.' Structural changes made include refining the introduction and conclusion for clarity and impact, as well as enhancing transitions between ideas. Suggestions for further improvements not implemented in the corrected version include the addition of statistical data or studies to support claims and further diversification of vocabulary. The tone used is appropriate for an academic essay, maintaining a formal and informative style throughout.
Detailed Scores
What this means:
The essay is logically organized, with a clear progression of ideas from the introduction to the conclusion. Cohesive devices are used effectively, such as 'first,' 'second,' and 'finally,' which guide the reader through the argument. To enhance coherence, the writer could use more varied linking phrases to connect ideas between paragraphs.
How to improve:
- Use a clear paragraph structure
- Connect ideas with appropriate linking words
- Maintain logical progression
- Use referencing effectively
What this means:
The essay demonstrates a good range of grammatical structures, with mostly accurate usage. Sentences are varied in length and complexity, contributing to the overall fluency of the writing. There are no significant grammatical errors, but minor improvements could be made in sentence structure to enhance clarity further.
How to improve:
- Use complex sentence structures
- Maintain grammatical accuracy
- Use a variety of sentence patterns
- Check for common grammar errors
What this means:
The vocabulary used is appropriate and conveys the message clearly. Terms like 'habitats,' 'polluting,' and 'endangered' are relevant to the topic. However, there is some repetition of phrases such as 'wild animals' and 'illegal hunting.' To improve, the writer could incorporate synonyms or more varied expressions to enhance lexical diversity.
How to improve:
- Use a wider range of vocabulary
- Demonstrate awareness of collocations
- Avoid word repetition
- Use more sophisticated vocabulary accurately
What this means:
The essay effectively addresses the prompt by identifying key reasons for the decline in wild animal populations and proposing relevant solutions. The ideas are well-developed with specific examples, such as the hunting of elephants and rhinos, which enhances the argument. To improve further, the writer could include more statistical data or studies to support their claims.
How to improve:
- Address all parts of the task fully
- Support ideas with specific examples
- Develop each point thoroughly
- Stay relevant to the topic
Related Writing Samples
Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on individuals and society. To what extent do you agree?
Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
We have become a disposable society, preferring to buy new products rather than fixing existing items. What are the causes of this trend and what are the possible solutions?
The tendency that news reports in media focus on problems and emergencies rather than on positive developments is harmful for individuals and the society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Today single-use products are still very common. Why is this? What are the problems associated with this?
In the future, more people will choose to go on holiday in their own country and not travel abroad on holiday. Do you agree or disagree?