You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: The only way to travel is to live in a country, not just to visit it for a short time as a tourist. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

Part 1 (Academic)
6.5

Sample Essay with Corrections

I agree to some extendt that living in a country is the best way to travel rather than only visiting it breiefly as a tourist. There are someeveral advantages to staying for a longer time when traveling. One benefit is that you can experience the culture more deeply. When you live in a place, you have the opportunity to interact more with local peoples, try authentic food, and participate in the customs and traditions of the area. This gives you a better understanding of the people's lifestyles than if you only see superficial tourist areas. For example, if you live in Italy for somea few months, you can learn to cook real Italian food from local chefs and experience the leisurely Italian way of having dinner with a big family, rather than just eating at tourist restaurants. Also Additionally, living in a place allows you to see more than onlyjust the famous sites. You have time to explore less well-known areas and discover hidden gems that tourists normally do not see. When I lived in Japan for one year, I was able to visit small villages and temples in the mountains that most tourists do not know about. This lets meallowed me to see a different, more authentic side of the country. However, I also think there is value in shorter trips as a tourist. Not everyone haves the time or money to live in another country for an extended period. Short visits letsallow people seto see the highlights of a place and get a taste of a different culture, even if it is not as deep an experience. Tourists trips can inspire people to learn more about a place and maybe return for a longer visit in the future. In conclusion, I believe that living in a country for a while is the best way to truly experience it, but I also think tourist visits have atheir place. Both types of travel can be enriching, and the best option depends on an individual's circumstances and preferences.
DeletedOriginal textAddedCorrected text

Expert Feedback

The essay effectively addresses the prompt by discussing both sides of the argument regarding living in a country versus visiting as a tourist. Key strengths include relevant examples and a clear structure. However, critical areas for improvement include refining the introduction for clarity and enhancing the conclusion to summarize the main points more definitively. Structural changes made include correcting grammatical errors, improving coherence with better transitions, and ensuring proper spelling and word choice. Suggestions for further improvements not implemented in the corrected version include expanding the range of vocabulary and varying sentence structures for greater sophistication. The tone used is appropriate for an academic essay, maintaining a formal and analytical style throughout.

Detailed Scores

Coherence And Cohesion
The essay is generally coherent, with a logical flow of ideas. However, some transitions between sentences and paragraphs could be smoother. For instance, the shift from discussing the benefits of living in a country to the value of short trips could be better signposted. To enhance coherence, the writer could use more cohesive devices and ensure that each paragraph clearly relates back to the main argument.
6.5
Grammatical Range And Accuracy
The essay demonstrates a reasonable range of grammatical structures, but there are several errors that affect clarity, such as 'to stay longer time' instead of 'to stay for a longer time' and 'not everyone have' instead of 'not everyone has.' These errors, along with some awkward constructions, detract from the overall quality. To improve, the writer should focus on grammatical accuracy and vary sentence structures to enhance the sophistication of the writing.
6.0
Lexical Resource
The vocabulary used is appropriate for the topic, with some effective phrases such as 'authentic food' and 'hidden gems.' However, there are instances of repetition, such as the use of 'country' and 'tourist.' Additionally, some word choices are awkward, such as 'breefly' instead of 'briefly' and 'peoples lifestyles' instead of 'people's lifestyles.' To improve, the writer should aim for a wider range of vocabulary and check for spelling and grammatical accuracy.
6.0
Task Achievement
The essay addresses the prompt by discussing both sides of the argument regarding living in a country versus visiting as a tourist. It provides relevant examples and reasons to support the writer's viewpoint. However, the introduction could be clearer, and the conclusion could be more definitive in summarizing the main points. To improve, the writer could refine the thesis statement and ensure a more balanced exploration of both perspectives.
7.0

Related Writing Samples

Part 1 (Academic)
8.0

You eat at your college cafeteria every lunch time. However, you think it needs some improvements. Write a letter to the college magazine. In your letter, explain what you like about the cafeteria say what is wrong with it suggest how it could be improved

Part 1 (Academic)
6.5

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
6.0

The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.

Part 1 (Academic)
5.0

"Violence in playgrounds is increasing. However, it is important that parents should teach children not to hit back at bullies."