IELTS Writing Sample Essays and Model Answers
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: Nowadays, high technology has become an integral part of our lives. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of advanced technology on society and individuals, and give your opinion on how we should deal with the challenges posed by high technology. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.
Advansed technology is increasingly becomming a huge partof life today. There is computers, internet, smartphons, and other high tech devices wich have a many impacts to people and to society too. This essay wil discuss about positive and nagative impacts from high tech and how to deal it. One positive impact is that tekhnology makes life more convenient. We can use smartphones to communicate easy with people far away. Also online shoppping and food delivery apps make it so convinient to buy things and get food dilivered to our homes. It is so convenient compare to the old days. Another benefit from modern teknology is it makes many works more efficient. For example company can use computer sistems to store data and do analysis more faster than doing manual. It improves producktivity for businesses very much. However, there are several drawbaks of high technology we must consider it. First it can makes people too dependent on their devices. Many people are addict to smartphones, always checking social media and cant put the phone down. It has nagative affects on peoples relationships and privat lifes. Secondly high tech causes some jobs to lost. When factorys use robots and automations instead human workers, there will lost many jobs for people. So teknology can make unimployment problem get worse in future. In concloosion, high technology brings both positives and negatives to individuels and society. It improve conviniense and efficiency in life and work, but also cause smartphone adiction problem and job losses too. I believe the way to deal this challenges is by balanc. We shoud enjoy the benifits of technology but must also control it, not let it control us. For job problem governmant needs to creat new types of work and train people for high tech world. If we can find rite balance, high teknology will bring more positive then negative for everyone.
In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an aging population creates problems for governments. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people.
Nowadays, peoples are live longer than before in many country. It is controversial topic whether ageing population give benefits to society or creat problems for govrnment. In my view, elderly people made great contribution to our society although there is few challenge for government. On the one hand, an aging population can caused some problems to goverments. First of all, more old people mean that they need more health care and medical treatment, which can be expensiv burden for government to budget. Secondly, as people reach retirement age, there will be less worker to pay tax and suport the economy, which can lead to financial deficilt and slowing economic growth. On the other hand, there are also many positiv aspects to have more elderly people in society. Firstly, senior citizens has a wealth of knowledg and experience that can be valuabl resource for younger generation. They can serve as mentors, teacher, and advisors, helping to passing on important skill and wisdom. Additionaly, as people live longer and healthier lives, they can remain active and engaged in their communities, contribute to volunteer works and civic engagement. In conclusion, while an ageing population may present some challenge for government, I believ that the benefits of having more older people in our societys outweigh the drawbacks. By valuing and supporting our elderly citizens, we can create a more inclusive, compassionate, and knowledgeable society for all.
Football has become a very popular sport worldwide. Why do you think football is so popular? Is it a positive or negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.
Football is the most popular sports in the world today. It is played and enjoyed by millions of people all over the globe. There are several reason for its tremendous popularity. Firstly, football is relatively easy and cheap to play. It dosn't require expensive equipment like other sports. All you need is a ball and some open space. This make football accessible to people of all social and economic backgrounds. Rich or poor, anyone can enjoy a game of football with their friends. Secondly, football is a very exciting games to watch. The fast pace, the skillful moves of the players, the drama of a close match - all of these elements make football matches thrilling to spectators. People love gathering to watch the big games with friends and family. It becomes a social event that brings peoples together. I believe the popularity of football is overall a positive developement. It encourage physical activity and teamwork among players. It give people a shared interest and a reason to come together. The global reach of football also foster cultural exchange and understanding between nations. Of course, there are a few downsides. The professonal football industry has become very commercialized. Some might argue it places to much emphasis on money and fame over the love of the sport. There have also been problem with violence between rival fans. But on a whole, I think football has an positive influence. It is a force that unites people around the world in their passion for the beautifull game. As the most popular sport on the planet, football will likely to continue bringing joy to millions in the years to comes.
In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is undoubtly true that people live more longer in current societi than in passed. There issome importent issue to discus about this trend, specificallyabout benefits and drawbacks of ageing populacions for the countrys and governement. Firstly, the elderly popuation make some problemes for nation. Old people usualy has more health isue and medicin needs. It meen government must give more money for healthcare for old people treatment. if more peoples are old, then less are working and paying tax money. So ageing popuation is burden for societi and create financial dificulty and presure. On the other hand, old people has many advatanges also. They has life experience and nolege to share with youngers generation. Old peoples help in family to caring for grandchildrens. This alow parents to work in jobs. also old people has free time to volunteer in comunity and doing charity works. In this way, elderli contribute positivly in socity and has an importent role inspite of the old age. In conclution, I belief that old people create both benefit and problem in countries with more long life. It is chalenge for goverment to solv, but also oportunity. We shuld value and respect elderlys and ensure they has good helthcare and living environment. Only than the ageing populasion will be more positiv than negativ for all.
More and more people are leaving the countryside to live in cities. Are there more advantages or disadvantages of this development for the environment?
In nowdays, there be increasing trend of pople leaving rural area to liveing in urban city. This phenomena have both positive and negative result for environement. In my opinnion, the disadvanage outweight the benefit. On the one hand side, when more persons move to cities it can be good thing for natural surroundings. With lesser individual in countryside, there will has reduce human activitees that can damage ecosystem such like deforest land for agricultre or pollutiin from farms. Also, centralizatiin of popullation in city allow for more efficent use resource and infrastracture, potentialy meaning less enviromental impact overall compare to peoples spread out acros large area. However, the drawback of urbanizasion are great. Firstly, as more and more poeple consentrate in city, it lead to overcrowd, traffik congestion and stretching of limite urban resource. These problem create increase air polluton, noise disturb, and waste generasion that harm environment in city and sourounding area. Secondly, abandon of rural region can also has negative affect. Without human maintan, previously cultivat land may suffer erosion and ecosystem may becoming unbalance. Morover, with fewer poeple engage in sustinable practices like organic farm, there are concernn about long-term impact on biodivercity and food suply. In conclusion, while there may be some enviranmental benefits to peoples migrating from countrysides to cities, I belief the negatives consequence are more signifiant. Govern and society must find way to develope rural areas sustainble and prevent overconsentration populasion in urban center for health of our planet.
Write a letter to the local council about plans to close a children's playground in your area. In your letter you should say Why children are not using playground Explain how important the playground is for local community Suggest how the playground could be improved
Dear Local Council, I am writing to you regarding the recent plans to close the children's playground in our area. I am strongly opposed to this decision and believe that it should be reconsidered. Firstly, I want to address why children are not using the playground as much as they used to. One main reason is that the playground equipment is old and outdated. The swings are rusty and the slide is cracked, making it unsafe for children to play on. Additionally, there are no benches or shaded areas for parents to sit and watch their children, which discourages families from spending time at the playground. However, despite these issues, the playground is still an important part of our local community. It provides a space for children to play and socialize with their peers, which is crucial for their development. It also serves as a gathering place for families and helps to foster a sense of community in our neighborhood. Closing the playground would take away this valuable resource and negatively impact the lives of many local residents. Instead of closing the playground, I suggest that it could be improved to make it more attractive and useful for the community. The playground equipment could be replaced with new, safe, and modern equipment that children will enjoy playing on. Benches and shaded areas could also be added for the comfort of parents and caregivers. Additionally, the playground could be expanded to include more features such as a basketball court or a small garden area, which would appeal to a wider range of users. In conclusion, I strongly urge the local council to reconsider their plans to close the children's playground. With some improvements and updates, it could continue to be a valuable asset for our community for many years to come. Sincerely, [Your name]
An overseas friend wants to visit your country on holiday. Write a letter to your friend. In your letter: Recommend the best time of year to visit and why Describe the types of accommodation your friend could choose Say what you would like to show your friend in your country
Dear my friend, I am so happy to hear you want visit my country! You asked me for some advices about when is best time to come, what places you can stay in and what I want show you here. I will try my best to answer this questions for you. In my opinion, the best time of year to visit is spring or autumn. Because in these seasons, weather is very nice - not too hot and not too cold. Also, there are many beautiful nature like flowers blooming or leaves changing color. It is perfect for sightseeing and outdoor activities. For accommodation, you have several choice. If you want stay in city center, there are many hotels with different price range. But if you prefer more quiet and relaxing place, I recommend you stay in guesthouse or homestay in countryside. You can experience local life and culture more closely. Lastly, I am so excited to show you around my country! There are so many amazing things to see and do. I want take you to visit famous landmarks like temples, palaces and museums. We can also go hiking in mountains or relax on beaches. And of course, you must try our delicious local food! I hope this informations are helpful for you. Please let me know if you have any other questions. I am looking forward to your visit very much! Best wishes, [Your Name]
The diagram below shows how solar energy is harnessed for human use. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The imagine shows about how humans are taking sun energy and making it to electrycity. This are big advancment and help for solving problem of energy demend. In the begining, sunlight come to earth by radiation waves. This waves have power but not in useable fourm. So experts found ways for changing this power into electrycity by using special equpmint like solar pannels. Firstly sun radiation fall on solar pannels. The pannels made from special materils that absorb sun radiation and convert to dyrect currant (DC) electrycity. But this form of electrycity not compattible with our normal appliances. So next step is to send DC electrycity to invertar machine. This machine change DC into Alternating currant (AC). This form is now useable for appliances. After that, the AC electrycity go to mains electrycity grid or can go to battries for storage. Mains grid send electrycity to city for using in homes, offices factries etc. If send to battries, electrycity can stored for use letter when sun is not giving radiation like at night time. So in summry, sunlight is powerfull sorce of energy but not direct useable. We need use special equpmint to absorb power of sun, convert to electrycity, change type of electrycity, and send to mains or battries for humens to use. This renewable way better for envyronmint compare with coal and oil. In future, more use of solar power is expect.
The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2006 and 2009. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart telling about how many british people moved to some contries from 2006 to 2008. it shows data for five countris: Australia, New Zealand, USA, France and Spain. In general, australia and spain was the most popular place for british to immigrate with highest numbers through all years, while new zeland had fewest british people moved. The number of british emigrating to USA was relativly stable at around 25000 to 35000 per year. Looking at the data in more details, in 2006 the most famous country was Spain with nearly 60000 british moved there, followed by Australia with around 50000 british moved. France was the third place where british like to move to with around 35000 people. However, moving to 2007 and 2009, Australia become the top preference of british, with around 50000 british moved to Australia each year, while number of british emigrating to Spain decreased dramtically to around only 27000 in 2009. Interestingly, opposit trend was observed for USA and New Zealand - number of british moving to USA increased slightly from 2006 to 2009 but it decreased for New Zealand within that period. In conclusion, the chart demonstrates some change in preference of destination to emigrate of british people from 2006 to 2009. While Spain was the most popular country in 2006, Australia become top choice from 2007 to 2009. Besides, USA, France and New Zealand did not change their attractiveness to british much during that time, with stable number of british moved to those countries each year.
Some people think that in the future all cars will be powered by electricity and not by petrol/gas. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In my country we have more car in the future. Many of them car powered by electric. I agree with this opinion that car will be powered by electricity becouse it is better for the environment and cheaper too. In this essay i will discuss why i agree with this view. First of all, the car that use electricity, they pollute less then the cars that are powered by petrol or diesel. The pollution from car is very big problem in world right now. Many city have very bad air quality due to all the pollution from cars. If all the cars in a city were powered by electricity, it would be huge improvement for air quality. The people live in city would be healthier. Government should encourge people to buy electric car by giving them tax breaks or other incentives. Secondly, in the long term, electricity powered car are cheaper compare to petrol car. Even thought the initial cost of buying an electric car may be higher, but over time they are much less expensive to operate and mentain. Electricity is cheaper than petrol or diesel. Also electric cars have less moving parts than other car so they require less repairs and mentainance over life of the vehicle. This save owner alot of money. As technology improves and more people buy electric car, the cost will come down even further. In conclusion, I strongly agree that in future most car will be powered by electricity. This is good thing for environment and for people wallet. Governments and sociaty should work together to make this happen faster. It is importent step towards more sustainable and healty future for all of us on the earth.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.
In some countries of the world, people are thinking that a big amounts of money should be used to build new railway tracks for high-speed trains among cities. On the other hand, other peoples believe that this money should instead be invested in making existing transport systems better. Both sides will be discussed in this essay and I will give my opinion. There are good reasons why large money should be spend on fast train lines between urban areas. The main reason is because it will let people to travel much quicker, and this is very good advantage. If trains go very faster, then it is possible to move between cities in short time, which saves every person's time. Less hours are wasted in travelling. Also, when railway lines are modernized and new, trains can carry more passengers in every trip, and it will reduce crowding. However, rather than building entirely new railway lines, I believe the money should be use to enhance current public transportation. Firstly, in almost every city, there are existing bus and train networks, but sometimes they are very old and need repairing or improving. By spending money to fix these systems, they will become more efficient and can benefit many people daily. Furthermore, it is much cheaper to upgrade what already exists rather then constructing brand-new infrastructure from the start. The money saved can also be put into other areas like healthcare or education, which is more important for society. In conclusion, while i can understand the reasons for wanting high-speed trains, in my opinion it is better to invest in making our current transport better. Cities already have public transport that can be made more efficient with some money rather then needing massive funds for new rail lines. I believe this approach will be most beneficial and cost-effective for majority of population.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: We all need to manage our time. Think about a skill you have for organizing your time and describe it to a friend. Write at least 150 words.
Dear friend Rajesh, I writing you to share good skill I have for organizing time. Time organization is great thing for all persons to do, because without it we cant do nothing good. My skill is write down the tasks I must do. Firstly I buy notebook from store near my house. Is small one that I carry all time. Then I think what I must do in day, and I write list in notebook. I write in morning all things for day. This helps not forget nothing. Secondly I doing the task I write down one at time. I dont go to next until first one done good. If I cannot do then I ask help for someone who know better. Sometime task is study, eating, or sleep. All go in list. Finally, I feel very good and make my day very useful. My father say "time is money" so I always remember that. Now I share secret with you my friend, maybe you also start write tasks and do one by one until you finish like me. It was fun to share my skill with you. Write me back about what you think. I hope my tip helps you too my friend. Lets meet up next week to hangout. Your friend, Vikram
The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.
The bar graphs provide information about how four metropolis - Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman - dispose their garbage. There is comparison between landfill, incineration and recycling in percentage. At first glance, we can see that landfill have the highest percentage for all of the cities. Amman is relying on landfill the most at around 93%. While Toronto and Kuala Lumpur also mainly use landfill, Madrid is lowest in using this method, instead have higher recycling and incineration of waste. Looking at recycling percents, we see Madrid do the most recycling at roughly 21%. Toronto also recycle quite much, about 19% of their waste. Kuala Lumpur and Amman on other hand, only recycle very little - under 10% each. This mean Madrid and Toronto is focusing more on recycling compare to other two city. For incineration, there are large differences between the cities. Kuala Lumpur and Amman are not incinerating waste almost at all, the percentages are too small. But Madrid is at almost 15% while Toronto around 7%. Therefore, Madrid seems using this method a lot while Amman and Kuala Lumpur do not use. To summarize, the graph shows how different cities have various strategies for waste disposal. While most relying on landfill overall, some are prioritizing recycling and incinerating more. Madrid is best example for trying to reduce landfill through other techniques.
In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that the government should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
In this current scenario, in most of the nations, there are very less people who getting high paying jobs. According to some people's opinion, it is beneficial for the country's economy and growth. But on the other hand, some people thinks that the government have to take some steps and does not permit the salaries more than specific standard. Both opinions have their own reasons and in the below paragraphs i will discuss about them in detail manner. To begin, high salaris motivate people to work hard. If people getting high salaries, it will encourage others also to do work hardly to acheive that position. It is like inspiration for youngsters and others. For example, if a software engineer getting very high salary in top MNC company, many students get interest to join in software field. So it will be very advantageous for the development of country. However, some people have different thought about high salaries. If some people earn very high, there will be very big difference between rich and poor. It leads to unequality in the society. For instance, a normal teacher earn twenty thousand per month, but a businessman earn more than one million per month. In this case, poor people feel inferiority complex. So according to those people, government need to fix a limit for salaries. In my opinion, i agree with first one. I mean high salaries is very important for nation growth. It motivate people to work hard and it will develop new technology and infrastructure in the country. Ofcourse, there will be some differences between people earning. But it is common and it is based on their talent and hard work. So i believe high salaries is acceptable one and it is very essential for development of country. To conclude, both opinions have their own reasons. Some people accepting high salaries and some people not accepting. According to me, i will support high salaries. Because it is very important one for nation economic growth and development.
In many countries rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. Do you think this is a positive or negative impact?
Nowdays, peoples in villages are going to town for living, so population of rural areas is becoming less. I think that this trens is having negative affect to countries. Firstly, when vilages have low population it mean there is less people to do farming job. Agricolture is the foundashun of food supplys, so if less pepole work on farm, it make problem for getting enough food for hole country. Also, it cause village economi to weak, because less workers means reduce productiviti and income. Secondly, as more persons move to citys it creates overcrowdnes and make the citys too full. There will be lack houses and apartmant for them to stay. Traffic jams get worst and worst, air pollushun raise, and quality of lyfe go down for city people. Migrasion from country to city puts pressure over all the city systems like transport, sewage, trash, hospitals. In concolusion, I belive rural peple moving on mass to urban areas is have negativ impact. It causing problems in both vilage and town. Government should try make policies to keep rural economi strong and give peeple reazon to stay in vilages. If not, then will have seerius trouble feed country and make sure citys livable and clean for everyboddy.
Describe your favorite place. You should say: where it is what it is like what you can do there and explain why it is your favorite place.
I want to tell about my favorite places. It is my grandparents home in countryside. It is locate far from city and surround with nature and beautiful environment. I like to go there during my holiday to spend my free time. The house is not too big but comfortable to live. It have a garden in front of house with many flower and tree. Behind the house there is a small land for planting vegetables. The air is very fresh and clean, not like in city. It is very peaceful and quite place. When I am there, I can do many outdoor activity. I like to help my grandparent in garden, watering the plant and pick the vegetable. I also like to take a walk in the forest near the house. Sometimes I go fishing in the river with my grandfather. In the evening, we sit outside and watch the star in the sky. This place is my favorite because I can relax and enjoy the nature. It is very different from my busy life in city. I always feel happy and peaceful when I am there. It is a perfect place to escape from stress and pressure. That is why it is my favorite place to visit.
The charts below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graphs are showing about water in the world also two country. In overall, we see world water use increase, and big differences between the cuntries. First graph giving how water use change in world. Its clear that use of water rising to almost 4 thousand cubic kilometer in 2000. Most thing use water is agriculture. Another thing use lot water is industry. This line go up but not much like agriculture. On the other hand line "domestic use" is not increase a lot and stay steady. Second graph shows how much water using in Brazil and Congo Democratic Republic. From the information we see water use in Brazil more than another country. For example, in 2000 water using in Brazil is 359 cubic meters per person but in Congo Democratic Republic is only 8 cubic meter per person. Another thing is Brazil use more water almost ten time more then Congo Democratic Republic. To summmarize, the graphs provide clear comparison of water using in the world and individual cuntries. Big differences between countries and sectors that use water in the planet. It would be good to find way to utilize water better since more and more water is using every where especialy for agriculture and industry.
You recently agreed to meet a friend but you missed the meeting. Write an email to your friend. In your email: Explain why you missed the meeting Describe the impact this had on your day Suggest how you can meet up in the future.
Dear Tariq, I hope you are doing good. I'm writing this email to apologize for missing our meeting yesterday. I'm so sorry, it's so emberrasing that I forgot to come even though we had already agree about it in advance. The reason why I did not came is that I had an urgent family matter come up at the last minutes. My younger sister suddenly became sick and my parents asked me to take her to the hospital. I was in such a hurry to get her to the doctor that I completly forgot about our plans to meet. I feel really terrible about forgetting and not informing you. Missing our meeting yesterday had a big effect to my day. I had been looking forward to seeing you and catching up, so I was really disappointed when I realised I had missed our meeting. I felt guilty and frustrated with myself for forgetting and letting you down. It put me in a bad mood for the rest of the day. I would still love to see you and make up for missing our plans. Are you free sometime next weekend? I could come to your neigborhood and we could grab a coffee or lunch. Or if you prefer, we could plan something fun like going to watch a movie or visiting that new art gallery you mentioned. Let me know what works best for your schedule. Again, I'm really sorry for my mistake yesterday. It won't happen again. I really value your friendship and feel bad for wasting your time. I hope you can forgive me. Let me know about getting together soon. Best wishes, Sameer
Some companies allow their employees to work from home but others still expect people to work in the office. Discuss both sides and give examples.
In these day, many company let the emplyees to work from their houses but at the same time other companys want that workers be in the office. There is good points on the both sides of this subjet that i will discuss. From one side, working from home has lot of adventages. First workers can save time because they dont need drive or take bus to go to work. Also they save money for the petrol or the bus tickets. Another point is that in house people can focus better on the job task beause there is no noisy collegues or other distractions like in big office. For example my friend tell me that when he works from house he finish all tasks more faster. However from other side, work in the office also have benefits. Firstly if you work in office you separet the work and life more better. When you work from house maybe the family distrect you or you start think about house tasks. Also in office it is more easy to talk with boss and coworkers to discus the projects and cooperate. Like if i have problem with my job i can go to my collegue desk and ask him and he help me. So communicate is more easy in the office then by online. In the concluson, i believe that every company need to give workers choise if they want work from office or from house. Maybe even they can do both, some day in office some day at home. This will make employees more happy and i think work better.
Should the government regulate the fast food industry in the same way that it regulates the drug, alcohol, and tobacco industries?
Nowadays in modern life fastfood companies is become more and more rampant. They are often saying that fast food is contributing to the obesity problem and causing health issues a lot to people. Because of that, some people argue that government need to controlling fast food industry same like they do for drugs, alcohol and tobacco. I am agreed with this opinion for a several of reasons. Firstly, fast food can be addictive in similar way like drugs. The salt, fat and sugar in fast foods make them very addictive. That's why many people specially the youngers eat fast foods very frequently and in large amounts. This over eating is leading to serious health problems like obesity, heart disease and diabetes to many people. Government regulation can help limit the amount of unhealthful ingredients allowed in fast food and reduce the risk for addiction. Second, fast food advertising is target children heavily. Just like tobacco companies in the past, many fast food companies run ads and promotions aimed for kids. Toys, games, bright colors all of these things are used to attract children for fast food restaurants. This is unethical because children cannot fully understand the health risks. Government have a responsibility to protect young people from this kind marketing, same like they do for alcohol and tobacco. Lastly, society bears the costs for fast food related health problems. When people get sick or obesity from eating too much junk food, the healthcare system must caring for them. This is put strain on hospitals and taxpayers. Since all society must pay some of the costs associated to fast food, government have right to regulate the industry and reduce those costs. In conclusion, I believe government should regulate fast food in a same way it does drugs, alcohol and tobacco. Fast food have addictive qualities, is marketed unethically to children's, and the health impacts have high societal costs. Government oversight can help address all this issues and protect public health.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: Nowadays environmental problems are too big to be managed by individual persons or individual countries. In other words, it is an international problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.
In present day more and more peple say that ecological problems is too big to be managed by one person or even one countries. I am agree with this opinion. I think that ecological problem has become an international problem now. There are several reason to explain why I am agree. First of all, pollution does not have borders. For example, if there are much air pollution in one country, this air pollution will move to other country also. The wind will blow the polluted air to the next country. So one cuntry cannot stop air pollution alone. All countrys need to work together to stop air pollution. Secondly, many ecological problems are because of big companies that work in many different country. For example, big oil companys drill for oil in many countrys and sometimes they spill oil into oceans or rivers. This oil spills effects many country, not only the country it happen in. To stop problem like this, many country need to make rules together for the big companys. In conclusion, I agree that ecological problems is now an international problem that individual person or individual country cannot solve alone. All countrys in the world must work together to solve the environmental problems that we have create. If we do not, the world's environment will continue to getting worse and this will effect everyone in every country. We must take action now not later.