IELTS Writing Sample Essays and Model Answers

In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might this be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?

In some countries, it is very important for people to own a home rather than rent one. There are several reasons why this might be the case. Firstly, owning a home can provide a sense of security and stability. When you own a home, you have a place to call your own and you don't have to worry about being evicted or having your rent increased. This can be especially important for families with children, who need a stable environment to grow up in. Another reason why owning a home might be important is that it can be seen as a symbol of success and achievement. In many cultures, owning a home is seen as a sign that you have "made it" and are financially stable. This can be a source of pride and can help to boost a person's self-esteem and sense of accomplishment. However, there are also some potential downsides to the emphasis on homeownership. One concern is that it can create a divide between those who can afford to buy a home and those who cannot. This can lead to social and economic inequality, as those who are unable to buy a home may feel left behind or excluded from certain opportunities. In addition, the pressure to own a home can also lead to financial strain for some people. Buying a home is a major financial commitment, and if people take on more debt than they can afford in order to become homeowners, it can lead to financial difficulties down the road. Overall, i believe that the importance of homeownership is a complex issue with both positive and negative aspects. While owning a home can provide security and a sense of accomplishment, it is important to recognize that it may not be feasible or desirable for everyone. It is important for society to find ways to support and provide housing options for all people, regardless of their ability to purchase a home.

Many people say that the only way to guarantee getting a good job is to complete a course of university education. Others claim that it is better to start work after school and gain experience in the world of work. How far do you agree or disagree with the above views? It is probably true to say that most people believe that a university degree is the only way to get a good job.

in my opinion, go to university for getting better job not always good choice. of course, having dgree can open moer doors for finding job, but experience is also importent. when you start wroking after school, you gain real-wrold skills, and can sohw potential emploeyrs what you capable for. on the one hand, University education provides u with knowledge and skills in speficic field. it can help u stand out form other candidates when applying for jobs. and many profssions, such as docters or engineers, requrie a degree to even be considred for the position. so, in some cases, havnig degree is a must for getting good job. on the otherhand, there is much to learned from practical ecxperience. when you work after school, you get chance to aplly what you learen in real-world setting. u can develop important skills, like teamwork, commuincation, and problem-solvign. employers often value thees skills just as much, if not more, then the knowledge gained from degree. moreover, not everyone have opportunity or means to attend uinversity. for some poeple, starting work after shcool is the only optin. that should not mean they canot get good job. with determination and hardwork, anyone can succeed in their chosen career, regradless of their educational backgorund. in conclusion, while univresity education can be valuable for getting good job, it not the only path for success. experience and practical skills are also important, and should not be overlooked. at the end, it is up to individaul to decide what best for them, based on their goals and circumstrances.

Recent figures show an increase in violent crime among youngsters under the age of 18. Some psychologists claim that the basic reason for this is that children these days are not getting the social and emotional learning they need from parents and teachers. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

In the current time, there are more and more young people who are doing the violent crimes. According to some psychologists, the main reason is because the children are not getting the proper social and emotional education from their parents and teachers. I am agree with this opinion to a large extent. Firstly, parents play a very important role in the development of their children. They are the first teachers of their children and they have a big influence on their children's behavior. If parents do not teach their children the right values and morals, the children will not know how to behave properly in society. For example, if parents do not teach their children to be kind and respect others, the children may become aggressive and violent. Secondly, teachers also have a responsibility to teach their students the social and emotional skills. In school, children spend a lot of time with their teachers and classmates. Teachers should not only teach academic knowledge, but also teach students how to communicate with others, how to solve conflicts, and how to manage their emotions. If teachers do not pay attention to these aspects, students may not learn how to deal with problems in a peaceful way and may resort to violence. However, I also think that there are other factors that contribute to the increase of violent crime among young people. For instance, the influence of media and the lack of proper guidance from the society. Children may imitate the violent behavior they see on TV or in video games. Moreover, if the society does not provide enough support and resources for young people, they may feel frustrated and turn to crime. In conclusion, I agree that the lack of social and emotional learning from parents and teachers is the basic reason for the increase of violent crime among youngsters. Parents and teachers should work together to provide children with the necessary skills and values to become responsible and peaceful citizens. At the same time, the society should also create a supportive environment for young people to grow up healthily.

Write about the following topic: Drug abuse is becoming more and more common in many countries. What are some of the problems associated with drug abuse, and what are some of the possible solutions? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

Nowadays, drug abuse has become an increasing problem in many countries over the world. There are several reasons which can lead to drug abuse such as peer pressure, stress, and curiosity. Drug abuse can cause many problems not only for the individual abuser but also for the society as a whole. Firstly, drug abuse can have detrimental effects on a person's health. When someone abuses drugs, they may experience health problems such as lung or heart disease, stroke, cancer, and mental disorders. Furthermost, drug abuse often lead to addiction. Once a person is addicted, it is very hard for them to quit the habit. They may need professional help to successfully quit and start leading a normal life again. Secondly, drug abuse can lead to social problems. Drug abusers often have difficulty holding down a job or attending school. As a result, they may resort to crime to get money to support their habit. This can lead to a vicious cycle of crime and poverty. Additionally, drug abuse can tear families apart. Children of drug abusers are more likely to be abused or neglected. They may also start using drugs themselves, continuing the cycle of abuse. There are some possible solutions to this drug abuse problem. Firstly, Education is key to preventing drug abuse before it starts. Children need to be taught about the dangers of drugs at an early age. They should know that drugs are addictive and can ruin their lives. Secondly, treatment for drug addiction must be more readily available and affordable. There should be more rehab centers and support groups to help people quit using drugs. Finally, the government should crack down on drug dealers and make it more difficult for people to obtain illegal drugs. In conclusion, drug abuse is a serious problem with many negative consequences. It is important to take action to prevent and treat drug abuse. Only by working together we can hope to make progress in the fight against this growing problem.

The chart below shows the number of three types of visitors to a museum between 1997 and 2012.

The chart is illustrate the quantity of three kind visitor who came to a museum from 1997 to 2012. There is students and children, adults, and school tour. The vertical line tell the number visitors and horizontal line show the year from 1997 to 2012. In beginning 1997, only almost 40000 adults visit the museum. The adult number increased slowly until 2012 it reach around 80000 visitor. For school tour, it start at almost 50000 in 1997 then it drops a little in 2002 before growing fast to over 100000 visitors by 2012 end. The students and children start at 100000 visitor in 1997 and keep increase steady to almost 160000 in last year 2012. Overall, the most numerous visitors every year are the students and children. It increase steadily all the time. Adult is the least visitors but it growing slowly over the years. The school tour have up and down but increase a lot in the end to become second biggest visitor group.

The world of work is changing rapidly and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life. Discuss the possible causes for this rapid change, and suggest ways of preparing people for the world of work in the future. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

In recent years, the work environment has changed a lot comparing to the past. There are several reasons for this change, and i think it is important to help people to be prepared for the new work environment in the future. Firstly, one of the main reasons for the changing work environment is technology. With the development of new technologies, many jobs that were done by human in the past can now be done by machines or computers. For example, in the past, many people worked in factories to make products. However, now many of these jobs are done by robots and machines. This change has led to many people losing their jobs, and it has also changed the way that many companies operate. Another reason for the changing work environment is globalization. With the increasing of international trade and communication, many companies now operate on a global scale. This means that employees may need to work with people from different countries and cultures, and they may also need to travel frequently for work. This can be challenging for some people, especially if they are not used to working with people from different backgrounds. To help people to be prepared for the changing work environment, I think it is important to provide them with the necessary skills and training. For example, schools and universities can offer courses in technology and computer programming, which will help students to be prepared for jobs that require these skills. In addition, companies can provide training programs for their employees to help them to adapt to new technologies and ways of working. Another way to help people to be prepared for the changing work environment is to encourage them to be flexible and adaptable. This means that they should be willing to learn new skills and take on new challenges, even if it means changing their job or career path. By being open to change and willing to adapt, people will be better equipped to succeed in the new work environment. In conclusion, the work environment is changing rapidly due to factors such as technology and globalizaion. To help people to be prepared for these changes, it is important to provide them with the necessary skills and training, and to encourage them to be flexible and adaptable. By doing this, we can help people to succeed in the new work environment and to have fulfilling careers.

A challenge for many students is deciding what major to study when entering universities, because of two important factors. First of all, students have to know exactly what their strengths and weaknesses are in all careers in society. Then, they will know if their abilities are suitable for certain jobs. There is a fact that students should not listen to what anyone says because this is only their future. For example, parents may say to their child: "you should study in a business university", but only the child knows that he likes drawing and he will find success as an artist. Another important point when students choose their university is the social demands. There is a saying that can explain this point clearly: "passion may not make money for a living". It is good if students understand themselves and are passionate about some jobs. But, some students may not fulfill their dreams and will not have success. Therefore, choosing what major to study at university must be connected with the demands of modern society to ensure the future success of students. In conclusion, students have to understand their abilities and know what society needs when they choose their major at university.

Decision for what major subject at university for a student to study is a challenging, this because of two main factors. Firstly, a student must to know exactly their strong and weak points in all type of careers in our society. And then, a student will know if their abilities are suitable for what jobs. There is a fact that students should not listen any one says because it is only their own future. For an example, parents may say to their child: "you should study in business university", but just the child know that he likes drawing and he will get success with being an artist. Another important point when a student is chosing the university is social demands. There is a say that can explain clearly this point, that is: "passion may not make money for lives". Students should comprehending themselves and their passions in some jobs, it is good. But, some students may not fulfill their dreams and not have successful. So, choosing what major universities must connected with demands of the modern society for ensuring future success of a student. To conclude, a student have to understand their abilities and know what society needs when choosing their major subject at university. Only by this way, a student can make a right decision for their future and get success.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: Some people think it is more important to choose a university major that you are interested in. Others believe it is better to choose a major that will offer better job opportunities. Which view do you agree with? Explain why. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

Some people thinks it is more important to choosing the major in university that you are interested at. Other peopel believe it is better to choose the major that will give you more job opprotunities. I agree more with the view that chooseing a major you are interested in is more important. The reasons I think this way is because if you choose a field to study that you do not have much intrest in, it will be very difficult to motivate yourself. To study hard for many yers in university. If you don't like what you are studying, it may feel very boring and you may not want to go to classes or do the asignments. This can make it hard to finish the degree and succeed. But if you are very interessted in your chosen field, you will naturaly be motivated to learn more and work hard even when it becomes challanging. Another reason for choosing a major based on your intrests is that you will likely do better in ur career if it is something you are passionate about. If you enjoy your work, you will put more effort and enthusiam into it. This can lead to more sucess and advancement opportunities compared to someone who chose a field only for job prospects but does not really like the work. Additonally, if you study a field you love, you may be more likely to pursue graduate studies or other advanced trainings to further your knoledge and career. Of course, job opportunities are also an importent factor to consider. It is good to research the job market for diffrent fields to understand the career paths. However, many fields that are interesting can also lead to good jobs if you work hard and gain strong skills. And your interests may lead you to a career path you had not originaly considered that ends up being a great fit. In conclusion, I believe chosing a major based on your interests is more important then only focusing on job opprotunities. You are more likely to succeed in your studies and career if you pursue a field you are passionate about. Having a genuine intrest will keep you motivate through challenges. Researching job prospects is still useful, but it is better to start with your interests and then explore the career paths that can come from that.

More and more people are leaving the countryside and going to cities nowadays. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

It is clear trend that people are moving from rural areae to urban cities more and more in presnt day. There are both benefits and drawback to this developments. I will analyse some of this factors in the fallowing paragraphs. One of the main advantagges of people going into cities is better access and opportunity for job. In cities, there are much more work available compare to villages and rural areas. Many big company and factory are located in cities which means there hire many worker. Also there are more option for study and gain qualification for jobs thru colleges and universities locate in cities. On other hand, countryside have limit career choice mostly in agricultuer jobs. However, living cost in cities is very high disadvanteg. Price for housing, food, transportation etc. in cities usually very expensiv compare to rural placez. For instanse, rent for apartment in big citiez can be many times higher than villege house. Another negative aspect is pollution in city due to lots of vehicles and factory which is unhealthy for peoples living their. In short, I belive that while urban migration have positives liek job and education opportunitis, the high costs and pollution are major negatives. In my view, government should work on develop rural areas more so peoples can find job there and not need go to citiez. This will help balance between rural and urban population and reduse strain on city resource.

Social media in politics You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: Social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram are now widely used by politicians and political parties to spread their message and connect with voters. Do the advantages of social media use in politics outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

These days social medias like Facebook and Twitter very commonly used by politician and political partys. They are using it for spread their messages to connect to the voter. In my opinions, there is both advantage and disadvantage of using social media in politic, but I belief more advantage than disadvantage. The first advantage is politician can reach very huge amounts of people very fastly through social media. In past days, if politician wants to talk to public, he needs to go and speech in many various places. It taken so much time. But now, he just posts his ideas online in Twitter or Facebook and instaneously many many peoples can see it. Another advantage it is politician can target exact peoples who will vote for him. In Facebook you can chose who you want message go to, only peoples in specific location and ages for examples. So very powerful way to campain. But we can not forget about some dangers of using social media in politic to. One danger is mis information can spread very easilly and quicklly through social media. If politican posts something not true, it maybe seen by millions peoples who belief it without thinkings. And peoples who disagree with politician can also reply false informations. So much potential for public to become confused by this way. Other disadvantage, I belief, is that politican can not have real connections with voter through social media only. If he only post messages online but never meet peoples face by face, publics might not feel emotionally connected to him. They feel he is far away and not care about thems. Direct human interaction still important I thing. In conclusions, while social media in politic have some dangers like fake news confusion voter, I belief overral it have more advantage then disdavantages. Ability to reach so many peoples so fast and efficent is huge power for politician. But still, combining it with traditional way of meeting voter in persons is the best I thing.

The average standard of people's health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Many person beleive that peoples health in future times will not be as good like it are now. I am disagree with this opinions. There is several reason why I think helth will be better, not badder, in the coming years and decades. First of all, medical science are always improve. In the past century there has been great advances in the medicinal field. We has discovered treatment and cure for many sickness and disease that was deadly before. This progress will certainly continue to future. As we unlocking the secret of genetics and cellular biology, we will solve even more medical mystery and peoples will live longer, helthier lifes. Medical science will keep improve so our children and grandkids will be more helthier then us. Second reason why helth will improve are because of educate. As our society getting more develop, peoples is more educated about nutrition, hygein and helthy living. In poor contry with not much school, peoples do not know importants of washing hands or eating vegetables. But in develope contry we learning this since young age. With more educate, everyone know how to live helthier life. This trend will keep going as more peoples in world get chance for proper educate. Some peoples worrying that modern lifestile will make us less helthy. They say we exercise not enough and eat too much junk food. While there are some true to this, I beleive the benefit of medicin and educate will more then make up for modern lifestile. In conclusion, I strong disagree that helth will be lower in future. With improve in medical science and educate around world, I am confidense that peoples will live longer and helthier than ever before.

You are having a party and want to invite your friend from a different city. Write a letter to your friend. In your letter: Describe why you are having the party Give directions on how to get to the venue Suggest how you can accommodate him/her

Dear friend, I write to you about party i organise at my house next friday. The reason why i have party is because i celebrate my birthday. I become 21 year old and i want to celebrate with all my friends from school and university. It will be very fun party with many games and a lot delicious food. To came to venue of party, you need to take train from your city and get down at central station. From there, you walk out of station and turn right. After walking for 5 minutes you will see big park on left side. My house is opposite of park, it is blue color building with number 27 on door. It is very easy to find, but if you have any problem you can call me and i will come to pick you up from station. I understand that you are come from far away, so i suggest you stay at my house after party. I have extra room with bed and bathroom, so you can stay comfortably. In morning, we can have breakfast together and I will drop you back to station for your return train. Please let me know if this plan is ok for you. I am very excited to see you at my birthday party. It will be great fun to catch up with you after long time. Please confirm if you can come and let me know if you need any other information. Your sincerely, [Your Name]

In today's competitive world, many families find it necessary for both parents to go out to work. While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income, others feel they lack support because of their parents' absence. Which viewpoint do you agree with?

These days, in many family both the mother and father have to working to earn money. Some people believes that this is good for the childrens because the family have more money to spend on them. However, other think that the lack of parental support at home have a negative affect. In this esay, I will discus both sides of this issue. On the one hand, when both parent work, they earn more money to support family. They can by better food, clothes, and educational resources for there children. For example, they can pay for private school or tutoring to help children succeed in school. Family can also afford to travel and have more experience. This can broaden the child's horizons and help them learn about the world. On the other hand, when mother and father are working all the time, they may not have much time for spend with children. Children may feel lonely or unsupported without there parents around. They may not have anyone to help with homework or listen to there problems. This can lead to behavior issues or poor grades in school. In my opinion, I believe that overall it is better when both parents work. While it is important for parents to spend some time with their children, the financial benefit of two income can provide more opportunities for the family. If parents make an effort to be there childrens as much as possible outside of work, the positives outweigh the negatives. In conclusion, there are points to consider on both sides of this issue. While children may miss out on some parental support, the additional income from both parents working can improve the family's quality of life. I believe that with a balance approach, children can still thrive in this situation.

In some countries few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people say that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In some country, a little amount of peoples have salary that is very high. There are some who thinks this is positive thing for the nation, but other believe goverment must take control on salaries and make a limit of how much a person can gain. I will discus about both sides of this isue and tell my opinion at the end. From one hand, if some people can earn alot, it can be beneficial for the country in few ways. Firstly, this peoples will pay more taxes which is good for economy of the country. Secondly, they might use their money to invest in busines or make donations to charity, that can creat more jobs and help the poors. So, high salaries can have som positive affect. However, on the other hand it can caused problems to if some peoples earn extremely high amounts compare to others. Firstly it will make big difference between rich and poor, which is not fare. Secondly, if they have so much money they can use it to influence politics, which is bad for democracy. Therefor, maybe it is beter if goverment puts limite on salaries. In conclusion, while high salaries for some can have benefits, I believe it is more important to have more equality in society. So in my opinion the government should control salaries and dont let some people earn to much compare to others.

What if the Earth was flat?

Some people thinks that if the earth is flat, it will affect to our daily lifes in many ways. I agree this opinion, because for me the earth to be flat can completely changing the world we know. First, if the earth is the flat shape, it affect how we are traveling. With an round earth, we can travell to any place by going straight in direktion. But if the planet is flat, when we get to edge, we cannot go more further or we fall off! It very dangerous for ships and airplanes that want to across the world. They must be carefull to not go over the sides. Secondly, gravity works different with flat earth. On ball-shaped earth, the gravity pull everything to middle. However, for flat earth maybe the gravity only pull down in one direkshon. This means everyones who live on the bottom surfice of flat earth is in big trouble! They fall into space. Also, oceans and rivers flow out the edges. In conclusion, i believe the earth is flat can change a lot how we live. It make travel more difficulter and dangerous because you fall off at the end. And also it completly change how the gravity works and pull things only down so bottom part of flat earth is not safe for living. For these reason, i am glad we live on a spherikal planet and not flat one.

The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graffs gives information about the usage of energie and released of greenhouse gasses in tipical australian homes. The first graff shows breakdown of energie usage by category while the second compaire the greenhouse emissions result from those usage. According the first chart, the most biggest usage of energy is for heating water, at 30%. after that, heating and cooling the house use about one forth of the energy consumption. Other household appliance are responsible for 15% of consume, and the frigidaire useing around 10%. Least energy is used for lighting at 5% only. When looking the second chart for greenhouses gas emissions, it is aparent that the heating of water and house cooling and heating are created the most emission. They accounting for almost 75% together. Fridges create about 10% and other apppliance create another 10 percent. The lightest causes create negligible emission at only 1%. It is clear the heating and cooling of homes cause most energy use and emissions. In concluse, the dada show that heating of water and colding and heating of homes are reason for majority of energi use and produce most greenhouses gases in Australian homes. There is corelation between amount of energy use for a category and the amount of emissiom it produce. Reducting heating and cooling of homes would likely has the biggest impact for decreasing greenhouses gasses from households.

"When it comes to healthcare, the phrase "prevention is better than cure" definitely rings true. This leads to an important debate about where a country's budget should be allocated - is it better to put a larger portion towards treating illnesses or towards preventing them in the first place through education and preventative measures?"

Nowadays, there is big debate about how much of nation's budget should spend on health. Some peoples thinking that more money need to give for treat sickness, but I strong believe that focusing in prevention by education is more importance. This essay will explain why stop sickness before it happen is best approach. Firstly, when goverment putting more funds to teaching about healthy life, it help people know what to do for avoid get sick. For example, if schools tell students importance of eat vegetable, exercise regular, and not smoke cigarette, childrens will learning good habits young. This kind habits will staying with them for life and lower change of get diabetes, lung cancer, heart attacks when adult. Secondly, prevention save lots of money in long-term. Hospital care and medicine is very expensive, espacially for serious disease. If less people getting sick in first place because good education about health, it mean less money needing later for pay doctors and buy drugs. In other words, a dollar spent on teach about nutrition and hygiene today save ten dollar on hospital bill tomorrow. In conclusion, i strongly recommend that nations focus their limited budget more on preventing sickness than treating them. Good health education in school and community will leading to population with knowledge for avoid many common disease. It also much cheaper than pay for care sick people in hospital. So putting money in prevention is smarter investment for better health of all.

It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children?

Nowadays, the topic of how to teach children is very discussed. Many people think that children must learn what is good and what is bad in their early years. They say that punishment can be a good way for this. I agree with this opinion, but only to some extent. I think that children should know the difference of wright and rong from a yung age. If they do not lern this, they may have problems in the future. For example, if a child does not know that stealing is bad, he may steal something and get in trouble with the law. Also, if a child think that lieing is okay, he may lie to his parents or teachers and this can cause problems in his relationships. However, I do not think that punishment is always the best way to teach children. In my opinion, parents and teacher should first try to explain to the child why something is wrong. They can use examples from real life or stories to help the child understand. If the child still does not listen, then I think a small punishment is okay. For example, the child can have to stay in his room for some time or he cannot play with his toys. But the punishment should not be too strong, like hitting the child. This can make the child afraid and it is not a good way to teach. In conclusion, I believe it is important for children to learn about right and wrong when they are young. Punishment can be used sometimes, but it should not be the first choice. Parents and teachers need to explain and give examples first. Only if the child does not listen, then a small punishment is acceptable.

The tables below provide information about the consumption and production of potatoes in five parts of the world in 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. You should write at least 150 words. Consumption of potatoes (kg per person) South and Central America 23.6 Africa 14.1 North America 57.9 Europe 96.1 Asia 25.8 Production of potatoes (in million tonnes) South and Central America 15.6 Africa 16.4 North America 24.7 Europe 126.3 Asia 131.2

The charts is presenting consumption and production of potatos in five continents in year 2006. Europe has highest consumption at 96.1 kg per person annually. Next is North America wth 57.9 kg, Asia has 25.8 kg and South and Central America with 23.6 kg. Africa stands last with only 14.1 kg consumption of potatoes per person in 2006 Now looking at production, it is interesting that Asia produces most potatoes at 131.2 million tones but consumtion on this continent is low. Europe is secound largest producer at 126.3 million tones and also biggest consumer of potatoes. North America produces 24.7 million tones potatoes, and South and Central America and Africa producing similer quantities 15.6 and 16.4 million tones repectively, but Africa has lowestest consumption. To summarise, Europe and Asia are major potato producers but consumption in Europe is four times higher then Asia. North America has moderate production and consumtion, and South and Central America and Africa has lowest production but consumption in South America twice as higher as Africa.

Mrs Barrett, an English speaking woman who lives in your town, has advertised for someone to help her in her home for a few hours a day next summer. Write a letter to Mrs Barrett. In your letter suggest how you would help her in her home Say why you would like to do this work explain when you will and will not be available

Dear Mrs Barrett, I am writing to you, regarding your advertesement for help in your home during next summer time. I seen your ad in local newspaper and thought i could be of assistance to you. To start, I could help with cooking and cleanings around house. I have experience from working at my aunts hotel where I worked as maid. I can vacuum and sweep floors, dust furnitures, wash dishes. Also i know how to make some easy meals like sandwiches and soups that require little ingredients, which could be helpful if you are not feeling to cook yourself sometimes. The reason i want to do this work is becaus I am studyng at university and will have free time in the summer. I Want to earn some money to pay for my studies and gain some work experiences too. It would be nice to help an elderly person like you, as I know it can be hard to manage household all by yourself when getting older. About my availibility, I will be completly free from June to august. However in May i have final exams so will only be available on weekends. Also i have a family vacation planned for 2 weeks in July so will not able to work then. But other than that, I am flexibile and can work hours that suits you best. Thank you for your considering my application. I look forward to hearing back from you soon. Please let me know if you need any more informations from me. Your sincerely, [Your Name]

Describe a foreign culture that you are interested in.

There are a many foreign cultures that I am interested in, but for me the most fascinated one is Italy culture. I am have much interest in their way of life style, traditions, and especially their food. Maybe, because i am love pizza and pasta very much. One thing that catch my attention about Italy culture is how their close family ties. In Italy, families are usually big and they are spend a lot time together, having meals and celebrate important occasions. They are value the importancy of family bonding, which is somethin that i am admire. Also, Italians are know for their warm hospitality and friendlyness to visitors and guests. It make me feel like i will be very welcomed if i am visit Italy. Other aspect of Italy culture that I find interesting is their rich history and art. Italy is home to many famous artworks, such like the Monalisa and the statue of David. I would love too see these masterpiece in person one day. Italy also has many beautiful historical landmarks like the Colloseum and the Leaning Tower of Pisa, which I am fascinated by their architecture and the stories behind them. Of course, I can't talk about Italy culture without mentioning their delicious food. Italians are passionate about they food and they have a lot of signature dishes that are loved all over the world. Whenever I am eat pizza or pasta, I am imagine myself in a cozy Italy restaurant, enjoying my meal with a glass of wine. In conclusion, Italy culture is one that I am very interested in because of their close family bondings, warm hospitality, rich art and history, and amazing food. I am hope that I can have the chance to visit Italy one day and experience their culture firsthand. It would be a dream come real for me.