IELTS Writing Sample Essays and Model Answers
What are the pros and cons of using public transport?
These days, public transport become more and more popular in many cities. It have both advantages and disadvantages for people who use it. In this essay I will describe both good and bad sides of using public transport. On the one hand, there are several benefits of public transport. Firstly, it is cheaper then owning a car. You don't need to pay for petrol, insurance or parking when you use public transport. Secondly, it is more environmentally friendly. Buses and trains can carry many people at once, so there are less cars on the roads and less pollution in the air. Thirdly, you can relax or do other things while traveling by public transport, like reading or listening to music. You don't have to concentrate on driving. On the other hand, there are also some drawbacks of using public transport. One disadvantage is that it can be very crowded, especially during peak hours. Sometimes there are no seats available and you have to stand for a long time. Another downside is that public transport is not always reliable. Buses and trains can be late or cancelled, which can make you late for work or appointments. Finally, public transport does not go everywhere. If you live far from a bus stop or train station, it can be hard to use public transport regularly. In conclusion, public transport have both pros and cons. It is cheaper and better for the environment then cars, but it can also be crowded, unreliable and not available everywhere. Whether to use public transport or not depends on each person's situation and preferences.
We are becoming increasingly dependent on computers. They are used in business, hospitals, crime detection and even to fly planes. What things will they be used for in the future? Is this dependence on computers a good thing or should we be more suspicious of their benefits?
In the modern days, computers has become an essential parts of our lifes. They are being using in many different fields such as business, hospitals, crime detection and even to fly airplanes. It is clear that computers will continue to be use more and more in the future. One area where computers will likely be use more in the future is in education. With the rise of online learning and educational softwares, students will have access to personalize learning experiences that can adapt to their individual needs and paces. Additionally, computers may also be used to automate grading and feedback, freeing up teachers to focus on more high-level tasks such as lesson plannings and one-on-one interactions with students. Another area where computers may be used more in the futuure is in healthcare. With the advent of artifical intelligence and machine learnings, computers could be use to analyze medical datas and assist doctors in makings more accurate diagnosis and treatment plans. They may also be used to remotely monitors patients and provide them with realtime feedbacks and advices. While the increasing dependence on computers can brings many benefits, it is important to also be aware of the potentials risks and drawbacks. One concern is the potential for job losses as more tasks become automated. Additionally, there may also be concerns about privacy and security as more personal datas is collected and store on computers. In conclusions, while the increasing dependence on computers can bring many benefits, it is important to also be aware of the potential risks and drawback. As we continue to intergrate computers into more aspects of our lifes, it will be important to strike a balance between embracing the benefits and beeing cautious of the potential negative impacts.
The rise of social media has had an impact on communication. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages.
In recent time, the rise of social media has changed the way we communicate with each other. There are both advanteges and disadvantages to this development, and I will discuss them in this essay. One of the main advantages of social media is that it allow us to connect with people from all over the world. With just a few clicks, we can send mesages to friends and family members who live far away. We can also join online communities and meet new people who share our interests. This can help us feel less lonely and more connected to others. Additionally, social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter can be used to share news and information quickly and easily. However, there are also some disadvantages to the rise of social media. One concern is that it can lead to less face-to-face interaction. When we rely too heavily on social media for communication, we may miss out on the benefits of in-person conversations, such as reading body language and building deeper relationships. Social media can also be a source of distraction and can take away from other important activities, like work or studying. Moreover, there are concerns about privacy and the potential for cyber-bullying on social media platforms. In conclusion, while social media has brought many benefits to communication, such as connecting people across distances and sharing information quickly, it is important to be aware of the potential drawbacks as well. We should strive to find a balance between online and offline communication in order to maintain healthy relationships and stay focused on our goals.
The graph below shows electricity consumption in England between 1980 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The greph shows how much electricity was consumed in England from 1980 to 2000. The greph shows information about two different sectors, domestic and industrial, over a period of 20 years. In 1980, industrial sector consumed more electricity, around 75 terawatts, and domestic sector consumed less, around 40 terawatts in same year. The industrial consumption was always higher than domestic during entire period shown on greph, but gap between them got smaller over time. The industrial consumption stayed relatively same over 20 years period, it was around 75 terawatts in 1980 and around 80 terawatts by 2000, so there was only small increase. On other hand, domestic electricity use increased a lot from 40 terawatts in 1980 to around 70 terawatts in 2000, which is big jump. In conclusion, both sectors had increased electricity consumption from 1980 to 2000, but domestic sector had much bigger increase compared to industrial sector during this time. Even though industrial still consumed more overall, the gap between two sectors got much smaller by end of period.
Some people believe that technology is making people less creative. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
In contemporary society nowaday, some people argue that technology make peoples to be less creativity. I am partially agree with this opinionon. On the one hands, technologies can give negative impacts for human creativity. People relying on technologies too much in dailly life, for examples using calculators for simple math problems and auto-correct keyboards for writing. This behavior causing people to thinking less and being less creative. Moreover, entertainments like movies, videos game also reduce peoples motivation to create things themself. However, on the otherhand, technology also can stimulate innovation and creativity. With technologies, people can access many informations easily and learn new knowledges and skills. For example, learning how to drawing or cooking from online tutorial. So, technology allowing people to creation new things. Besides that, softwares and tools like design program and 3D printer give people capability to creatively express theirs ideas. In conclusions, although technology can reducing people ability to creative in some aspects, i belief technology has more positively affects for enabling and encouraging human creativity if using it properly.
The bar chart illustrates the estimated number of illiterate people.
The bar chart is showing the estimate of number of peoples who are illiterates. It is very importent to understanding this problem because it afects many peoples in the world. The chart is easy to read and understanding, it shows the number of illiterates peoples in diferent countrys. In the first country, which is maybe India or China, the number of illiterates peoples is very high, maybe around 50 millions or more. This is very big problem for this country because it means many peoples cannot read or write, and this makes difficult for them to find good job or to understanding important informations. In the second country, which is maybe Pakistan or Bangladish, the number of illiterates is also high but not as much as the first country, maybe around 30 millions. This is still very big problem and the govermint of this country should work hard to fixing this problem. In conclusion, the bar chart is showing very clearly the estimate number of illiterates peoples in diferent countrys. It is very importent for the goverments of this countrys to work hard to fixing this problem, because it afects many peoples and makes difficult for them to have good life. The goverments should invest more money in education and make sure all peoples have access to good schools and teachers, so they can learning to read and write and have better future.
The importance of some subjects at school You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: Some people think that some school subjects are more important than others. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.
In my opinion, I am agree with that some school subjects is more important than other subjects. There are few reasons why I think like this way. First of all, main subjects like math and science is use everywhere in life and career. For example, if we want to be engineer or docter, we need to know math and science very well. Without strong fundation in this subjects, it will be very diffcult to succes in this careers. So, school need to focus more on teaching this important subjects to prepare students for future. Secondly, subjects like history and art is less important for most people daily life and work. While it is good to have some knowledges about the past and culture, it is not essential for many jobs. Most people will not use history or art skills regullary in they career. So, school should spend less time on this subjects compare to math and science. However, I also beleive that students should have balance education with variety of subjects. Even if some subjects is more important, students still need to learn other things to become well-rounded. Subjects like language, sports, and music can help develope important life skills such as comunication, teamwork, and creativity. This skills are also valuable for success in work and life. In conclusion, while I agree that some school subject like math and science are more important than others, I also think student need diverse education. School should prioritise teaching important subjects but also provide oportunity for students to learn other valuable skills and knowledge. By doing this, schools can help students become successful in they future career and life.
Some people argue that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others believe that there are more effective ways to achieve this. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There are divided opinions on the most effective way to improve the health on the publics in the world. Some people propose that increasing the sports facilities is the most productive way to improve the health of the people, while others think another method is more successful than this. In this essay, I will analyze both sides of the arguments and would include my personal view in the end. On the one side, providing more sports facilities will make people easily to do some exercises. Because sports is an effective way for people to keep healthy, it is a good way to build more facilites to push people to do more sports. For example, if there are more football field in the city, the people will play football more frequently and will be more healthy than before. On the other hand, however, there are another ways and maybe more better. Improving public health requires not only increasing sports facilites but also other ways. For example, government should put more effert on building the publics transport system to encourage people to less use private car while go out, which is an effective solution to reduce the pollution in the air and people's health will be improved by the fresher air. What is more, the awareness of people for health themselves is important too also. In conclusion, while I agree that increase number of sports facilites is one of the way to improve public health, I believe there are more effective ways like to develop public transport and raising people's consciousness of health.
The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.
The two graph illustrate how the spend of american citizen changed from 1966 to 1996 on different category. Overall, we can see that spend on cars have increased biggest, while americans spent less on food over the 30 years period. Looking at the pie charts more specifical, in 1966 a quarter of americans budget went towards food, which is much greater proportion than any other category at the time. Cars was second biggest spend at 23%, follow by housing at 29%. However clothings made up a mere 10% of spending, and all other spends combined amount to just 13%. Thirty year later, the distribution of expenditure have changed significant. In 1996, food drop to the 3rd biggest category at just 14% of total spend. This is a massive decrease compare to 1966. On the other hands, spend on cars increased to 45%, which is nearly double what it was in 1966. It became the majority of american spend. Housing stay roughly similar at 19%. Clothings also remain stable as a proportion of overall expenditure. To conclude, while americans allocated more and more of their budget towards cars over the three decades, foods became a much lower priority as a percentage of total spend. Housing and clothings stay consistent over these years.
In many cities, the problems related to overpopulation are becoming common. Some governments are now encouraging businesses and individuals to move out of cities to rural areas. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, overpopulation is big problem in many citys. The goverment try to solve it by make people and companys move to countryside. I think this have more advantage than disadvantage. First, when peoples move out of city, it reduce the number of people live in city. This mean less traffic and pollution in city. Also, it can make the price of house and apartment in city go down, because less peoples want to buy or rent them. This is good for peoples who still live in city, because they can have better life with less traffic and cheaper house. Second, when businesses move to rural area, it can help the ekonomi of rural area. The businesses can provide job for peoples in rural area, so they dont have to go to city to find work. This can make the rural area more develop and have better infrastruktur, like road and school. Also, the businesses can help local farmer by buy their products, so the farmer can have more money. Of course, there are also some disadvantage of this trend. For example, some peoples might not want to move to rural area because they think the life there is boring or not convenient. Also, if too many peoples and businesses move to rural area, it might cause problems like traffic and pollution in rural area too. In conclusion, i believe the advantages of encouraging peoples and businesses to move to rural area are more than the disadvantages. It can help to solve the overpopulation problem in city and also help the ekonomi of rural area. The government should give more support and incentif to make this trend happen.
It is becoming more and more difficult to escape the influence of the media on our lives. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of living in a media rich society.
Today, the medias are part off our everyday live. They surrounding us whichever way we will go. It is becoming more difficult to avoid their influents and sometimes control over our lifes. There is some advantages to leaving in society witch is so rich off medias. But there is disadvanteges as well. In this essay I will discuss both sides of the arguement. From the one hand, medias bringing us a lot of informations. They allowing to always being connected with the world and know what hapening. With internet and smart phones we are have constant access to informations, news and entertainments. It is very convenient, we dont have to wait any time for informations, everything is here immediately. Also, we can communicating with peoples from around world thank to social medias. We can to share our experiances and opinions on internet blogs and in youtube videos. It connecting peoples and making world smaller. From other hand, some peoples saying there is to many medias in our lifes. They worrying about negative affects on our relationships and mentality health. If we spending all time on phones and computers, we dont have time for face to face communicating with family and friends. We dont developing real human connections. Also, some peoples saying medias can influenting our opinions and thinkings. If we all time reading same informations and ideas, we starting to believing them even if they wrong. Medias can spreading fake news and manipulateing peoples minds. It can be dangers for society. To summarise, living in media rich world have both positive and negative sides. We must learning to using medias wise, taking advantage of possibilities they give us. But also dont allowing them to control our lifes and minds. We must to finding balance between virtual and real worlds to living happy lifes.
Some people say that it is better to work for a large company than a small one. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, at time for finding work, lots of peoples are facing with decision if should choosing the big company or small one for there careeer. In this assay i will explain why i am believing the big companys are more suirtable and advise peoples to choose them instead small business. There are numerous benefit of working to big company compare to small one. First, usually the large companies can providing more higher salarys and benefits, like health insurance or payed vacation days. This financial security are very importance, espeshally for peoples with family to care. Second, big companyes usally have more resources and can offering better equippment, trainings, and developping opporchunities for worker. This helpful for improve my carrier opportunnites in the future. On other hands, some may argueing that small company have adventages like more close relaytionship with boss and co-workers, and more flexible working hours. While this mite be true in sum cases, i belief the beneffit of big company are more important and valualbe in a long-term perspecctive. The financial securty and professional developping chances are more critical than a freindly atmosfere at workplace. In conclushion, altho there are sum potential benefit to working at small company, i strongly beleive that big companyes are better choice for most people due to the higher pay, beneffits, and developping opportunites they can provide. For this reasons, i advise job-searchers to prioritising large companies in there job hunt.
In some countries, companies allow people to work from home. In others, people are still expected to work in an office. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In this modern world, the way we work is changeing. Some companys letting workers to work at home, but other companys still want people come to office for work. This essay will discus both sides of this issue and I will share my own thinking on this topic. On the one hand, working from home have many benefit. Firstly, it is more convenient for the worker becaus they dont need to waste time on traveling to office every day. This saved time can be use for more productiv work or for relax with family. Secondly, working from home can helpto reduce the cost for companys. If more people work at home, companys need to rent smaller office and this can save alot of money. On the other hand, working in a office also have some advantages. First, when people work together in same place, it is easier to communicat and collaborat with each other. This can lead to more creativ ideas and better teamwork. Second, working in office can help to separat work life and personal life. When people work at home, the line between work and life can be blurred and this can cause stress and burn out. In my opinion, I think a mix of both working from home and working in office is the best solution. Maybe people can work from home for 2 or 3 days in a week, and work in office for the other days. This way, we can get benefit of both working styles. Companys should give workers more flexibilty to choose how they want to work base on their own situation and preferenc. In conclusion, both working from home and working in office have their own pros and cons. I belive the future of work will be a hybrid model that combines the best of both worlds. This will creat a more effecient and satisfying work experience for everyone.
In modern times, young adults are spending less time with their families and more time with their friends. Why has this change occurred? Do you think parents should force their children to spend more time at home?
It is indeededly true that youts are spending smaller amount time with their families and high time with their friends nowdays. This change has occurred due to several reasons and I will now further explain. Besides that I will also giv my opinoin on weather parents should force their childs to spend many more time at home. Firstly, the change has occurred because of the fact that young peoples have more freedom than before ever. They can easily go out with thier friends without needing permission from ther parents, this is because parents are usually busy with work nowdays. Moreover, technolgy has also played a role in this change. Young ppls can easily stay connected with their friends thruh social media and messaging apps, so they feel less need to spend time with thier families. Secondly, I believe thaat parents shudnt force their children to spend more time at hom, that they are old enough to make their own decisons regarding how they want to spend their time. Forcing them to stay at house may only lead to conflict and resentmnt. Instead, parents should try to create a positive and welcoming environemnt at home and encourage their kidos to spend qualty time with the family whenever they can. In conclusion, the change in yung adults spending more time with their friends than families is a result of increasd freedom and technoology. While parents shouldnt force their childrens to spend more time at home, they can still encourage it by making home a positive and welcoming place.
The charts show the frequency of happiness of different age groups and two groups of workers in Europe in the previous four weeks. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts is showing the happiness frequency of diferent groups in Europe over the last 4 weeks. The groups include diferent age groups and also two worker groups. In the age groups chart, the 65 and over age group have the highest frequency of being happy all the time, at around 18%. The 50-64 age group is lower, at around 16%. The 25-49 age group is even lower, at around 14%. The under 25 age group have the lowest frequency of being happy all the time, around 12% only. The age groups chart also shows the frequency of being happy not all the time. The under 25 age group have the highest frequency at around 80%. The 25-49 age group is lower at around 77%. The 50-64 age group is even lower at around 75%. And the 65 and over age group has the lowest frequency of being happy not all the time, around 60% only. In the worker groups chart, self-employed workers have a higher frequency of being happy all the time compared to employed workers. Around 20% of self-employed workers are happy all the time, while only around 14% of employed workers are happy all the time. However, employed workers have a lower frequency of being happy not all the time compared to self-employed workers. Around 75% of employed workers are happy not all the time, while around 78% of self-employed workers are happy not all the time. In conclusion, the charts show that happiness frequency varies by age group and worker group in Europe. Older age groups and self-employed workers have a higher frequency of being happy all the time, while younger age groups and employed workers have a higher frequency of being happy not all the time.
Most of the world's problems are caused by overpopulation. Do you agree or disagree?
I am agree that most problem in the world caused by overpopulation. There are many reason for this opinion. Firstly, when there is too much people, there is not enough resource for everyone. For example, food and water become scarce when population grow too fast. This lead to hunger and thirst for many peoples, especially in poor country. Also, housing become expensive and crowded, which cause many to live in slum or on street. Secondly, overpopulation cause environmental damage. With more peoples, there is more pollution and waste. Forests are cut down for housing and farming, which destroy habitats of many animal. Pollution from factories and cars increase, which contribute to global warming and climate changes. These environmental problem affect everyone in world, not just overpopulated area. In conclusion, I strongly agree that overpopulation is main cause of most world problems today. It lead to lack of resource, poverty, and environmental damages. Governments need to take step to control population growth, such as education and family planning. Only then can we hope to solve these pressing global issue.
You recently made an online purchase and the product was not the same as the description on the website. What you purchased and when. Exactly how it is different from the website description. How you would like the company to fix the problem.
Dear Sir or Madam, I am writing to say that I am not satisfied with the product that I purchase from your online store last week. The item was a blue sweater, size large, which I ordered on 15th March. When I received the sweater, I found that it was not the same as it was described on the website. On website, the color of the sweater was shown as bright blue, but the one I received is actually dark navy blue. Also, even though I ordered a large size, the sweater that arrived is more like a medium size. It is too tight and not comfortable to wear. To resolve this issue, I would like to request a refund or exchange for the correct item. Please let me know what is the process for returning the sweater and getting a new one that matches the website description, or getting my money back. I look forward to your reply and a resolution to my problem. Please let me know if you require any additional information. Thank you for attention to this matter. Your sincerely, [Your Name]
You and your friends ate a meal at a restaurant to celebrate a special occasion, and you were extremely dissatisfied with the experience. Write a letter to the restaurant manager. In your letter: Explain the reason for the celebration Give details of your visit to the restaurant Say what you would like the restaurant to do Write at least 150 words.
Dear Restaurant Manager, I am writing to complaint about my recent visit to your restaurant. It was my best friend birthday and we decided to celebrate it by having a dinner at your restaurant. We hear a lot of good things about the food and service from our collegues, so we were very excited to try it out. However, our expirience was extrimely disappointing. Firstly, we had to wait for more than 30 minutes to get a table, even though we made a reservation in advance. When we were finally seated, the waiter was not very attentive and seemed to be in a hurry. He did'nt even bother to explain the menu or the specials of the day. Secondly, the food was not up to the mark. The pasta was overcooked and the sauce was bland. The pizza was soggy and the toppings were scarce. We also ordered a bottle of wine, but it was not chilled properly and tasted stale. We were very disappointed with the quality of the food and the service. I would like you to take our feedbacks seriously and take necessary steps to improve the quality of the food and the service at your restaurant. I also request you to refund us the money we paid for the meal, as it was not worth it. I hope you will take my complaint seriously and take appropiate action to address the issues I have raised. Sincerely, [Your Name]
The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart is showing information about how families in a country spended their weekly income in 1968 and 2018. It gives us details about percentage of weekly income spended on different thing like housing, food, transportation, healthcare, and other things. In 1968, familes spent biggest portion of their income on food which is about 35%. But in 2018 amount spent on food has been decreased to 20% of total income. Amount spent on transportation and healthcare was very low in 1968 but it has rised a lot in 2018, up to 20% and 10% respectively. Housing cost has remained almost same with small decline from 32% to 30%. Other category has seen very big rise from just 6% in 1968 to about 20% in 2018. This shows that people are now spending more of there income on things which are not basic neccessities like food and housing. It indicates that overall quality of life and standard of leaving has improved as people have more dispensible income to spend on leisure and other activities. In conclusion, the chart clearly showing that there is shift in spending pattern of families from 1968 to 2018. Expenditure on food have reduced while transportation, healthcare and others category have increased. Housing cost is almost remain constant over the period.
You borrowed an important textbook from a classmate last term. You now realize your classmate had returned home overseas and you still have the book. Write a letter to him / her. In your letter: apologize for the mistake find out how important the book is to him / her say what you will do
Dear my friend, First, I want to give you my apology. I am so sorry that I still have your textbook that you lend me last term. I completely forget to give it back to you before you go back to your home country. This was big mistake of me. I know that book was important for you, because you told me it help you a lot in the class. But I don't know exactly how much important it is. Is it very very important to you now? Or maybe you don't really need it anymore because the class is over already. Please tell me your thoughts about this. I feel very bad for my forget and want to make it right. If the book is still important to you, I will send it to your home address right away. I can pay the shipping cost, it is no problem. Just let me know where I should send it to. But if you do not need the book any more, maybe I can keep it and use it for my study. What do you think is best? Again, I am really sorry for this trouble I caused to you. I will wait for your reply to see what I should do with the textbook. I hope you are doing well in your home country! Your friend, Mina
Many working people get little or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time, and have health problems as a result. Why do many working people not get enough exercise? What can be done about this problem?
In todays world, many employees not doing any exersize while work or after it. They are face problem with health beacuse of this. There are several reasons for this issue and some things can doing to solve it. One major reason is that jobs this days often requir sitting in a office all day with little moovment. People work on computer for long hours, have meetings in conferense rooms, eat lunch at their desk. Another reason is after long tiring work day, people too exausted to go to gym or do sports. They wanting relax at home, watch TV, play video game instead exercize. Working schedule leaves few time or energy to be active. To adress this problem, companies shuold encourage workers to take breaks and moove around during work day. For example, they cuold have stand up desk option, or suggest walk during lunch break. They also provide gym membership as employe benefit to motovate exercise after work or on weakends. Goverments could invest in more public parks, sports facilities to make easier for busy people to access them. Most importantly, individuals must prioritize they're health, even if dificult with busy scedule. Taking small steps like using stairs instead elevator, walking short distance instead driving, can make big diference over time. In conclusion, lack of exersize is serious issue for many employees today because of sedentery jobs and limited time. But with eforts from companies, goverments and indoviduals themselves, it is possible increse physical activity and improve health of working population.