IELTS Writing Sample Essays and Model Answers
Many criminals commit more crimes as soon as they are released from prison. What do you think is the cause of this? What possible solutions can you suggest? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
It is said to that many criminals commit crimes again shortly after they are released from prison. There are numerous reasonings to explain this problem, and various solutions have a potential to mitigate it. Firstly, one major reason for re-offending is that criminals may have difficulty finding employment after their release. Having a criminal record are making it challenging for them to secure a job, even if they have skills and a desire to work. Without a stable income, they may feel compelled to return to crime in order to making money to support themselves and their families. Moreover, many criminals come from disadvantaged backgrounds and may not have had access to education or job training while in prison. Without necessary skills and knowledge, they may see that they have few options other than to return to criminal activity. There are several solutions that could potentially reduce the rate of re-offending among released criminals. Firstly, prisons can invest more in education and job training to better prepare inmates for life after release. This could help them develop abilities and skills that are valuable in the job market, making it easier for them to find legitimate employment. Another solution is to provide more support for released prisoners, such as job placement assistance, housing assistance, and counseling services. This could help them navigate the challenges of reintegrating into society and ensure that they have resources they need to stay on the right path. In conclusion, high rates of re-offending among released prisoners is a complex problem with no easy solutions. However, by addressing the underlying issues such as lack of education and employment opportunities, and providing more support for released prisoners, it may be possible to reduce the rate of criminal repeat and help more people successful return to society.
The image shows the process of treating waste water at a plant before releasing it into a river. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram showing waste water treatment plant, there are several steps involved, to clean the water, before releasing it into river. In first step, the waste water thru the screen to remove floating or big debri. Then, it pases thru grit to remove small particles like sand and stones etc. After that the water goes into primary settling tank, where solids settles at bottom of the tank, and they then removed by scraper. In next step, water moves on to aeration tank and air is pumped, into the water to help bacteria to grows and break down organic matters. From there, water goes to secondary settling thank, where again, solid matters settles at bottom and are removed. The final steps is to chlorinate the water for disinfection, before relasing into near by river. Overall these process helps to cleans the waste watter so that it is safe to relese back in the river. Without these processes, the rivers would quickly becomes polluted and harmfull for environment. It's a importent proccess that needs to be done to keeping rivers clean.
An increasing number of professionals, such as doctors and teachers, are leaving their poorer countries to work in developed countries. What problems does this cause? What solutions can you suggest to deal with this problem?
In many poor countrys, professional like docter and teacher are leaving to going work in rich countrys more and more. This phenemonen is cause numerous problems for society. I will disscuss some of the main prolems this cause and give some idea to solve this isuue. Firstly, when many doctor and teacher go to abrod, it make big problams for the education and healtcare system in they home country. For example, if to many doctor leave, than there is not enough docters to treat all the sick peeple. This mean peeple will not having access to the medical care that they need. Also, if alot of teacher go oversea, than the quality of edducation will decreese. The schols will have difficulity to find enough good teacher, so the standered of teaching go down. Overall, this brain drain have very negative inpact on the key services like healthcare and education in poor country. Secondly, these problem damage the economy and development of the poorer nation in the long term. For instanse, with low quality school and not enough doctor, the population will be less helthy and not have good skill. This mean in future, the workforce will be weeker and less able to contribute to econemy. As a result, the country may sruggling to develep and progress. In conclusion, the departure of these professional is like a big obstecle to the growth of the developing country. So, to deal these issue, I beleive governmant should take some steps. One solution is to increse the salary of doctor, teacher in poor country. If they pay is better, than they will have more motivation to stay in they home country. Another idea is to create some rule or law to make doctor and teacher have to work in they own country for certain number of year before they can go to other country. This help ensureing that there are enougth professional in the country. Governmant should also spend more mony on education and healthcare sevices to mak it better, so that the professional will want to stay. In conclusion, the increasing move of doctor, teacher to develped country cause many problem for poorer country, like damaging healthcare, education, economy. However, if the governent take apropriate action to make beter condition and oportunity for these professional, than it can help to solve these ishue.
In many countries, paying for things using mobile phone apps is becoming increasingly common. Does this have more advantages or disadvantages?
These days, in many countrys, it is more and more common to pay for things use mobile phone apps. This have both advantages and disavantages, which I will explain in this esay. On one hand, there are several advantages to pay with mobile phone apps. First of all, it is very convenyent. You do not need to carry cash or credit card with you, only your phone which most people already have with them all the time anyway. Also, it can be more secure than carrying cash or cards, because if you lose your phone or if it gets stolen, you can easyly block the payment apps remotly. In addition, many apps offer discounts and rewards for using them, so you can save money. On the other hand, there are also some disadvanatges to this trend. One problem is that it can be dificult for older people or people who are not familiar with teknology to use these apps. They may prefer to pay with cash or cards which they are more use to. Another issue is that if there are problems with the phone network or the app itself, it may not be posible to make payments. This could be very inconvenient if you are relying on the app to pay for something importent. There are also concerns about privacy and data security, as companies may collect informacion about your spending habits when you use their apps. In conclusion, while paying with mobile apps have some clear advantages such as convenience and security, there are also valid concerns about accessebility, reliability, and privacy. I believe that as long as these issues are adressed, the advantages will outway the disadvantages in the long run. However, it is importent that people have the option to pay in other ways as well, so that everone can choose the method that works best for them.
In many countries, paying for things using mobile phone apps is becoming increasingly common. Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages?
In this morden world, with the help of the technologys, paying for goods and services via moble apps getting more and more popular in many countrys. This trend defenetly has both positive and negative effects on our lyfes. In my view, i think benifits of this develpment outweigh its drawbaks. On the one hand, there are several advanteges of using mobile apps for the payments. Firstly, it is very convenyent and saves a lot of time. For exampel, instead of carring cash or credit cards, people can simply use their phones to pay quickely and easily. Additionally, mobile payments are more secure as they often require biometric authentication like fingerprints or face recognition, reducing risks of thefts or frauds. This provides peace of mind and sense of security for the users when they making payments through mobile apps. However, on the other hand, there are also some disadventages associated with this trend. One of the main concern is that it can lead to overspending and impulse purchases. When people using mobile apps, they may not realise how much they are spending as they can not see physicaly money leaving their hands. This can result in financial difficulties and depts for some individuals who can not control there spending habits. Moreover, there is also a risk of technical issues or glitches with the apps which can cause inconveneince and frustration for the users. In conclusion, while paying through mobile applications has some drawbacks like potential overspending and technical problems, i believe its benefits such as conveinience, time-saving and enhanced security outweigh the disadvatages. As long as people use these apps responsibly and within there means, this trend will continue to grow and make our lives easier in the future.
The chart below shows the number of households in the U.S. by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart is showing how many household in United States of America are earn different income every year for 2007, 2011 and 2015. The household income levels is divided to five groups from less than $15,000 per year to more than $100,000 per year income. In general, we can see that number of households in all income levels are increase from 2007 to 2015. The most notable change is for households earning more than $100,000 per year, which was increase significantly from around 22 millions in 2007 to over 30 millions households in 2015. At same time, the households earn less than $15,000 per year are also increase but at slower rate, from around 14 millions to approximately 16 millions in 2015. The number of household in middle income levels between $35,000 to $100,000 are also growing but not as fast as high income group. In conclusion, the chart indicate that income levels of households in United State are improving from 2007 to 2015, with significant increase in high income households earn more than $100,000 per year. However, there are still many low income household earn less than $15,000 per year and their number are also slightly increase during this period.
The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams is showing how the floor plan of a public library has changed in the past 20 years. Overall, the library spaces has become more modern and digital. 20 year ago, the library have a large area for bookshelfs, which take up most of the space. There was also a small reception desk at the entrance. In addition, the library has a seperate room for reading with table and chairs. However, in the present day, the bookshelf space has been reduce signifigantly. Although their are still some bookshelves, a large portion of the area is now occupied by computer workstation. The reception desk have also grown much bigger. Morover, the reading room has been removed to make space for a coffee shop. In summary, this public library has evolved over the last 20 years, transitioning from physical book to digital resource. The reading spaces was replaced by computer and a coffee shop to create a more modern library experience.
Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed. However, others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments. Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.
It is controversial topic that whether animal experiments should be banned or not. Some peoples think it is cruel and unnessecary, but others argue that it bring many benefits to humans and science. In my opinion, I believe that animal testing can be justifield in some cases, but we should try to find other methords if possible. There are some reasons why animal experimentation can be acccepted. Firstly, it has lead to many important discoveries in the past such as new medicines and treatments for diseases. For example, insulin was first discovred by testing on dogs, and this has saved millions of lifes of people with diabetes. Secondly, animal testing is sometimes the only way to make sure that a new drug or chemical is safe before using it on humans. It would be unethical to test directly on people without knowing the risks. However, it is also true that animal experiments can causing a lot of suffering and pain. Manytimes the animals are kept in small cages and subjected to painful procedures. This is why many people think it is wrong and should not be allowed. There are also some other methods that can be used insted of animal testing, such as computer simulations, cell cultures, and human volunteers. These alternativs are becoming more advanced and could one day replace animal experiments completely. In conclusion, I think that animal testing is sometimes necessary for the benefits of science and medicine, but it should be avoided whenever possible. We must continue to develop new methods that does not involve animal suffering, and use them whenever we can. Only in cases where there is no other option, animal experiments can be justifyed.
"Canada is a beautiful country to visit"
Canada are a very beautiful country for visit. It has many things that make it beautifull and attractive for tourists and visitors. First of all, the nature in Canada is stunning, with lot of mountains, lakes, forests and other scenery that are breathtaking. You can find amazing landscapes in every part of the country, from the Rocky Mountains in the west to the Atlantic coast in the east. The national parks, such as Banff and Jasper, offer incredible views and opportunitys for outdoor activities like hiking, camping and skiing. Moreover, canada also has vibrant cities that are worth visiting. Cities like Toronto, Vancouver and Montreal are known for their diverse cultures, delicious food and exciting nightlife. These citys have many attractions, such as museums, art galleries, and historic sites that showcase the rich history and heritage of Canada. In conclusion, i believe that Canada is truly a beautiful country that offers something for everyone. Whether you are interested in nature, culture, or city life, you will find plenty of reasons to visit and explore this amazing country. So if you have the opportunity, I highly recommend to visit Canada and experience its beauty for yourself.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. A friend of yours is in the hospital recovering from a serious operation. He is going to be in the hospital for at least another two weeks. Write a letter to your friend. In your letter: express your sympathy reassure him that you will help in any way you can suggest some ways you could help You should write at least 150 words. You do NOT need to write any addresses.
Dear my friend, I so sorry hear you in hospital after big operation. Must be very hard time for you now, but I want say I think of you very much and hope you recover fast. Please don't worry about anything, just focus on get better. I want help you in any way I can while you in hospital. If there anything you need, just tell me and I will do my best to help. Maybe I can bring you some book or magazine to read, or some healthy snack to eat. Or if you want me visit and keep you company, I am happy to come anytime. Also, please don't worry about work or other responsibility. I will take care everything for you until you are healthy again. I can collect your mail and pay your bill, or feed your pet if you have one. Whatever you need, just ask and I will do it. Most important is for you to rest well and follow doctor instruction. I know it not easy to be in hospital for long time, but stay strong! You will be healthy soon I am sure. And remember, you have many friend who care about you and want to help. I wish you have speedy recovery! I will come visit you soon. Your friend, [your name]
People in many countries are spending less time with families. What are the reasons and effects of this?
In the past years, peoples in many country have been spend less time with their families. There is many reason for this trend and it has several effect on society and family life. This essay will discuss some of main reasons and effects of this issue. One of major reason why people spending less time with family is because of work pressure. In today's fast-paced world, many peoples have to work long hour to meet the demands of their job and to earn enough money to support their families. This mean that they have less time to spend with their families, especially during weekdays. Additionally, some people have to work in different cities or even countries, which make it difficult for them to see their families regularly. Another reason is the increasing use of technology and social media. Many people, especially younger generation, spend a lot of time on their smartphones or computers, chatting with friends or browsing the internet. This can take away from the time they could be spending with their families, even when they are physically present in the same room. The effects of spending less time with family can be significant. One effect is that family bond may become weaker over time. Children may feel neglected or disconnected from their parents, which can lead to behavior problems or emotional issues. Couples may also drift apart if they do not spend enough quality time together, which can lead to relationship problems or even divorce. Another effect is that children may not receive the guidance and support they need from their parents. Parents play a crucial role in teaching their children values, manners, and life skills. If they do not spend enough time with their children, they may not be able to provide this important guidance, which can affect the children's development and future success. In conclusion, there are several reasons why people in many countries are spending less time with their families, including work pressure and technology use. This trend can have negative effects on family relationships and child development. It is important for individuals and society as a whole to recognize the importance of family time and to make efforts to prioritize it.
In some countries, people are spending less time with their families. What are the effects of this?
In many place of the word, people is spending less time with they familiys. This happening has many effects on the persons and society. I will discuss some effects in this esay. One effect is that the relashionships between family members becoming weeker. When people dont spending time together, they dont have oportunity to talk and share they experiences. This can lead to misunderstandings and conficts. For example, if children dont spend time with there parents, they may feel that there parents dont understand them or care about there problams. Another effect is that people may feeling lonely and isolated. Families provide emosional support and companionship. Without this support, people may feeling depressed and anxious. They may also have dificulty forming close relashionships with others. This can be particulary difficult for older people who rely on they families for social interractions. A third effect is that children may not learn importent life skills. Families play a important role in teaching children values, manors, and how to intract with others. If children dont spend time with they families, they may not learn this skills. This can lead to behavior problems and dificulty in school and later in life. In conclusion, when people spending less time with they families, it can have negative effects on relashionships, emosional well-being, and child development. It is important for families to make time for eachother and prioritise family relashionships.
The pie charts give clear data about changes in annual expenditure in UK schools during the period between 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The pie charts is showing the changes of spendings in UK school in 3 years: 1981, 1991 and 2001. We can see that the spendings in teachers' salaries is the biggest part of spendings in all of the 3 years, which is 50%, 45% and 45% accordingly. This number do not change a lot. Secondly, the another big part of spendings is other workers. It is 28% in 1981, which is higher than the spendings for resources and furnitures. Then it decrease to 22% in 1991 and 2001. The spendings for furnitures and resources increase from 15% in 1981 to 20% in 1991 and 2001. Finally, the insurance have the smallest part of spendings, which is about 7-8% only and do not change much during the period. In conclusion, the teachers salaries is always the most high spendings in UK school, while the insurace is always the least. The another 2 kinds of spendings have a little change.
You have received a birthday gift from a close friend that you do not like. Write a letter to your friend. In your letter: - thank your friend for the gift - explain why you do not like the gift - suggest what your friend should do with the gift
Dear my best friend John, I writing letter to you about birthday gift you give me. Firstly, I just wanna be say thank you for very nice of you to give me a gift on my birhtday. It really means a lot to me that you remembered and take time to buy me something. Even if I don't like the gift, I still very appreciate yuo thinking of me. The reason why I don't really like the shirt you gived me is the color and style not really my taste. Is florescent green color which I never wear and has a strange desgin on the front that I don't understand. I know you probably thought it look cool and unique, but its just not the kind of thing I normally like to wear. I feel bad that you spending money on a gift for me that I probably won't use very much. I have an idea of what you could do with shirt instead of me keep it. Maybe you can return to the store and exchange for something different that more my style? Or if you want, you could keep shirt for yourself if you like it and think it suits you. I wouldn't want to see it go to waste just sitting in my closet. Let me know what you would prefer to doing with gift. Again, I want to say I very grateful for you generous and kind gesture of birthday gift. Your friendsip means so much to me. I hope you undertand my honset feeling about the shirt and we can figure out a good solution together. Thank again for being such a good friend! Your friend forever, David
A museum near your home is looking for people to do part-time voluntary/unpaid work. You would like to do some voluntary/unpaid work at the museum. Write a letter to the museum director to apply for the voluntary/unpaid work. In your letter: - Explain why you want to do voluntary/unpaid work at the museum - Describe some skills and qualities you have that would be useful - Give details of when you would be available for work
Dear Museum Director, I am writing to apply for the voluntary part-time position at your museum that i saw advertised recently. I woud very much like to be considered to do some unpaid work at the museum. There are several reason why i want to do this voluntary work. Firstly i have a strong interest in history and always enjoy visiting museums to learn about the past. Volunteering at the museum will allow me to spent more time learning about the exhibits and artifacts. Secondly, i believe its important to support museums in the community and i think volunteering is a great way to show my support. Museums relies on the help of volunteers like me to operate. I have numerous skills and qalities that would be very valuable for this voluntary position. For one, i am very reliable and punctual person. You can count on me to always show up on time for my shift and complete any tasks assigned to me. Additionally, I am quite knowledgeable about the local history that the museum focuses on. I could share what i know with visitor and answer their questions. I also have strong communication skills and frendly personality that would help me interact well with museum guests. In terms of my availability, I would be able to volunteer two days per week - every Tuesday and Thursday. I could work a 4 hour shift on each of those day, either in the morning or afternoon depending on the museums needs. I would be available to begin volunteering immediately for the next several months. Thank you very much for considering my application to do unpaid work at the museum. I am excited about the opportunity to volunteer and contribute. I look forward to hearing back from you soon. Sincerely, [Your Name]
You should spend about 40 minutes on this question. Some people believe that sport is an essential part of school life for children, while others feel it should be purely optional. Discuss these opposing views and give your own opinion. You should give reasons for your answer, and include ideas and examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.
Nowadays, there has been a heated debate about the role sport should have in the lifes of schoolchildren. Some argues that sports is must be a key component to school activities, while other say it need to just be a choice. In this essay I will analyse both sides and give my own point of view. On the one hand, there are many reasons why sport should be compulsory for student. Firstly, sport improves physical fitness and health, which is crucial for growing kids. Regular exercise help prevent obesity and reduce risk of chronic diseases. In addition, sport teaches valuable life skill such as teamwork, discipline and perserverance. When children playing sports together, they learn how cooperate with others to achive a comon goal. Moreover, sports can boost self-esteem and confidence. Participating in competitions and wining trophies give children a sense of pride and accomplishment. On the other hand, some people believe that sport should be optional rather then required. One argument is that not all student are athletically inclined or interested at sports. Forcing them to participate can lead to frustration and resentment. Additionally, some parents worry that too much focus on sports can distract from acadmic pursuits. They argue that school should prioritise subjects like math, science and languages over physical activities. Another concern is the risk of injuries. contact sports such as fotball and hockey can result in sprains, broken bones or even concussions. In my opinion, I believe that sport should be an essential part of school life, but with some flexibility. School should offer a diverse range of sports and physical activities to cater to different interests and abilities. This way, every student can find something they enjoy and feel confortable participating in. However, I also think there should be some room for individual choice. If a student strongly dislike sports or have health issues that prevent them from participating, they should be allowed to opt out or find alternative ways to stay active. Ultimately, the goal shuld be to promote physical and mental wellbeing while also respecting each childs unique needs and preferences. In conclusion, there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate about sports in school. While some see it as essential for health, personal development and character building, others worry about it detracting from academics and causing unecessary pressure or harm. In my view, sports should be a fundamental part of education, but with enough flexibility and variety to accomodate different students. By striking a balance between structure and choice, schools can help children reap the many benefits of physical activity while also allowing them to explore other interest and talents.
Developing countries require international organizations' help. Some people prefer financial aid while others think practical aid and advice are better. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In today world, many country still developing and need support from international organizasion. There is debate about what kind of help is the most better - finanse aid or practise help and advice. I will discuss both opinion and give mine view. On the one hand, money support can be very useful for develiping countries. With extra fund, they can build infrastucture like roads, hospitals and schools. This will improv people life and help economi grow. More money means guvernment can invest in important areas and make progres faster. However, other peoples think that practilal aid and advice bring more benefit than just giving money. Developin countries often need expert knowledg and skills to solve chalenge. Advice on farming technique, bizness practices, or helth care can make big diferense. Teaching peopl how to do thing is better than just donat money. This kind of help make lasting chang and equipt countries to continue develop on they're own. In mine opinion, both financal and practical support has importent role in helping developping countries. Money is need for build things and start project. But advice and training is equaly important to make sure the money is use effectiv. In ideal situasion, international organizatien would provid combination of fund and expert help based on the country's specific needs. Only with balanse approach can develiping nations achiev long-term growth and improov live for their citisens. In conclus, while financial aid and practise help both have advantag, I believ the best solutian is to offer both accordin to develeping countries' circumstance. With suport from internasional organizasion, these country can overcom obstacl and reach their ful potential.
Some people think that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, argument about how much control of design building on big city own by government become more intresting. Althought lot people think government should be control, but another people belive it freedom should giving to the people who finance the building constructed. I will discuss about both opinion below and give my opinion. On the one hand, if government controlling the design, all of building will look same. This can make city look boring and not attractive. For example, if all building have same colour and shape like box, people who visit the city will not impress and think city not interesting. Moreover, if goverment have full control, they may not knows what design is best for the building. Maybe they choose cheap design that look bad after some times. On the other hand, let the people who give money for the building construction have fredom to choose they own design can make city look more interesting. Different design from different building can attract tourist to come and visit the city. Unique design can also become icon of the city, like Opera house in Sydney or Taj Mahal in Agra. Furthermore, the people who pay for the building must be know what design is suitable and good for the building. If design not good, people will not come and they will lose money. In my opinion, I belive government should have some control in design of building in big city, but still give freedom to owner of building to choose design they like. Government can make rule about size or height of building, but not control whole design. Building owner can choose design they like but still follow rule from government. With this way, big city will look interesting with different design of building but still neat and nice because have rule from government.
It is the schools' responsibility to teach students good behaviour in addition to providing formal education. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience. You should write at least 250 words.
Nowadays, more and more people thinks that school should teaching students not just only knowlige, but also teach students having good behaviouring. I am totaly agree with this opinion, I think school have responsibility for teach student how to behave well. On the one hand, I believe schools should teach students how be behave good. Because most students spend lot of time in school everyday, and they can learn many things from teachres and classmates in school. For example, they can learnt how to respict others, how to be polite, and how work together with other students. These are all importent life skills that they need in future. Moreover, if school not teaching these things, some student mite not learn them from other place, like from home or from society. Their parents maybe too busy to teach them, or the sociaty they live not good enuff to learn from. On the other hands, I also think that providing formal educations is equally importent for schools. The main purpose of school is still to teach student knowlage and skills that they needs to succseed in life. For instant, they need to learn math, science, language, and other subject that will help them in their future job or study. Without these basic knowledges, they will have hard time to find good job or go to university. So school should balance between teaching good behavor and provding formil educations. In conclusion, I strongly agree that school have responsibility to teach student good behaviour, not just only focus on formal educations. School should find a balance between these two things, so student can grow up to be well-rounded person with good knolidge and good behavor. This will help them a lot in thier future life and career.
The maps below show the changes of a school from 1985 to present time.
The two maps illustrate how a school has changed between 1985 and the present day. Overall, the school campus has undergone significant expansions and renovations over this period of time. In 1985, the school grounds consisted of a single building for classrooms, a small playground area behind it, and a parking lot to the right hand side of the building. There was also some trees around the perimeter of the school grounds. By contrast, in the present day map, we can see that the school property has expanded significantly. The original school building has been extended with two new wings added on, one on either side. The playground area behind the school building has also been made much larger. Additionally, several new facilities have been constructed on the expanded school grounds. Next to the enlarged playground, there is now a sports field for outdoor athletics and games. To the right of the sports field is a new swimming pool building. The parking lot has also been moved further back and enlarged, with a new access road added from the main road to the parking lot. Finally, there is a new bus stop area in front of the school. In conclusion, the maps demonstrate how the school has grown and improved its facilities over the past few decades to better serve its students. The original school building has been extended, new sports facilities have been added, and transportation infrastructure has been enhanced, reflecting the school's development since 1985.
The use of social media, for example Facebook and Twitter, is replacing face-to-face contact for many people in everyday life. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays use of social media like Facebook or Twitter has become more popular, and for many peple it replaces meeting face to face contact in real life. There is both advantages and disvantages to this trend, which i will discuss now in this essay. The big advantage of social medias is it allow us to connect and communicate with anyone at any times, no maters where they are locate in the world. For example, with Facebook I can send message or have video call with my frends or family who living in other country, something that was not possible in the past time. Social media also makes share information, news, photos so easy - just few clicks to post things on your wall and all your frend can see it. So thesee are all good benefits social media give to us. But on the other hand, I think there is some disadvantge to rely on social media too muches. When we replace face-2-face meeting with online chatting, we loosing important human connections and real interraction and conversation skills. For ex: it is not same feeling to get "like" on Facebook post compare to get real hug or see real smile on someones face. Also many studies showing spend too much time in front of screen using social media can make people lonely, sad, depress and jelous when they see other people perfect lifes online. In conclusion, while social media have many useful advantages in ability to connect us with ppl and share informations, but i belief the disadvantages of it replacing real human contact are more significants. We should try to find balancing and still meet ppl in real life and not depend only in online connection and chats. Real relationship are build by spending time together, not by like and comment on internet all days.