IELTS Writing Sample Essays and Model Answers

The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed, but it has also created problems that did not exist before. What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest?

In past years, internet have changed sharing and using information very much, but there are also problems that was not exist before internet. In this essay I want write about the biggest problems that relate with internet and will suggest solutions for these. First of all, one of most serious problem is cybercrime and hacking of personal information. When use internet, you must often give private data like name, address, bank details. But this data can be steal by criminals if website security not good enough. To deal with this problem, I think websites need invest more into cybersecurity measures, like encryption and two-factor authentication. Also governments should make laws about data protection more strict. Other big issue is spreading of false information and fake news on social media. It is very easy for anyone write anything on internet, even things that not true at all. This can cheat people and make them believe in wrong things. I think social media companies have responsibility identify and delete fake news from their platforms. They can use fact checkers and AI algorithms for this. Also, schools should teach children how recognize reliable sources and think critically about information they find online. In conclusion, while internet has made many things better in our lifes, it also has some serious issues like hacking and fake news spreading. We need work together - people, companies, governments - to find solutions and make internet safer and more trustworthy place for everyone. Only then we can use internet for the good things it can provide us.

The graph below shows the average monthly change in the price of three metals during 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph show the monthly price change average for copper, aluminium and gold metals for the year 2014. Overall, the price changes fluctuated up and down from month to month with copper having the most volatile changes while gold price stayed the steadiest. In January, copper price decreased sharply by around 6% but then increased about 2% in February. After February, it continue falling dramatically to reach the lowest decrease of nearly 8% in March. In April and May, copper price go up by roughly 2% each month. It fall again in June and July by around 2% before going up in August and September to about 2%. The price of copper ended the year decreasing in Optober to December, falling around 4% in the final month. The price of aluminium slightly less volatile compared to copper. It started the year with around a 1% decrease but then stay relativity stable from February to July, only increasing and decreasing by less than 1% each month. However, the price fell sharply by about 4% in August before rising back up by approximately the same amount in September. Like copper, aluminium price also declined in the last 3 months of year, ending down almost 3% in December. Gold have the most stable price changes throughout the year. It decreased around 5% at the start of the year but then stayed within a range of plus or minus 2% changes for the other months. Gold price had small increases from May to August but end the year falling about 1% in December, less of a drop than the other 2 metals. In summary, all three metal prices had up and down changes each month in 2014. Copper prices changed the most drastically while gold remain the most stable. By the end of the year, all three metals price were decreasing.

Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.

In schools topic if students must be seperate by ability or toghether with all abilities is discussed by many people. In my opinion, I am agree with people who says its better to has students with all abilities together in same school and class. First people says its good idea for schools to seperate students to different schools with abilities. This will allow teacher to teach on right level for students, so they can learn more better. Also, smart students wont be held back by slower students and can progress on their level faster. However, this can make slower students feel bad and less smart, which is not good for them. Other people thinks students shold study together with all abilities. I agree on this opinion beacuse students can learn from each other. Smart students can help slower students to learn and understand better. This also teaches smart students about how to help others and work together, which are important skills for life. All students can be friends and socilize together, which is also important for their development. In conclusion, while there is benefits to seperating students by ability, I thinks its more better to have students with all abilities together in same school. This allows them learn from each other and develop important skills like teamwork and helping others.

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Nowadays, people are producing more and more waste from their homes, but not all of this waste is getting recycled. Some people are saying that governments must make laws to force people to recycle more. I partially agree with this opinion, because I think laws can help, but they are not the only answer. On the one hand, I believe that making recycling a legal requirement can be an effective way to increase recycling rates. If people are afraid of getting fined or punished for not recycling, they will be more likely to do it. Laws can also help to create a culture of recycling, where it becomes the normal and expected thing to do. In some countries that have introduced recycling laws, like Germany and Japan, recycling rates are much higher than in countries without these laws. However, I also think that laws alone are not enough to solve the problem of low recycling rates. For recycling to be successful, people need to understand why it is important and how to do it properly. This requires education and awareness campaigns, not just laws. In addition, governments need to provide the necessary infrastructure and facilities for recycling, such as recycling bins and collection services. Without these things, people may find it difficult or impossible to recycle, even if they want to. In conclusion, while I believe that laws can play an important role in increasing recycling rates, I don't think they are the only solution. Education, awareness, and infrastructure are also essential for encouraging people to recycle more of their waste from homes.

The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The diagram illustrating the cement-making prodecure, and how cement is used for making concrete for construction. It shows fofteen stage process for manufacturing cement, starting with the raw material input and ending with concrete making for building. Limestone and clay are the basic material which is mixed with some other substance and then grinded for making slurry. This slurry is further heated to 1400 degree celcius to make clinker material in preheater and kiln. this clinker mater cooled and the ground to form a powder called cement. The cement then mixed with other ingredients such water, sand and gravel to produce concrete. this concrete is then used for various construction purposes for buildings and other infrastructures. Overall, the diagram shows the the cement-making is multi-step pocess which inloves different raw materials, machinery and heating/cooling cycles. And cement the powder is main ingredient but only one of the needed substance to make concrete.

The maps below show the changes that have taken place in Meadowside village and Fonton, a neighbouring town, since 1962.

The map illustrates how Meadowside village and nearby Fonton has changed from 1962. Most noticcbly, farmland in the north part of Meadowside has been converted into a housing estate by 1985. The area of forest to the west of the village have also been replaced with houses. The main change in Fonton is that the city expend greatly and became much larger. The railway Line that previously ended near the River have been extended cross the river into part of the expanded town. Additional houses are build along the rail line in the center of Fonton. A new Industrial estate have also been constracted in the eastern part of the town where there had previously only been fields and trees. In summary, the key changes from 1962 to the present include: significant expansion of Fonton and Meadowside, loss of forest and farmlands for residential development, and establishment of an industrial area and extended rail line in Fonton.

When the topic of using artificial intelligence crops up, there are split opinions regarding this. Here, a group of people are of the viewpoint that robots are useful to mankind for future innovations; whereas, another group counterclaims and states that many detrimental effects could be faced by humans owing to robotic development. Therefore, before arriving at an opinion, both viewpoints are analyzed further.

Artifical intelligens are very controversal topic it divides society. Many people thinks robots are very benefitial to human race for inventions in future. On the oter hand side, other peoples says robots have many negativs results for humanity due to progres of robotics. So, this esay will analize both opinions before make conclushion about this issue. To inisially, there are strong reasons why robotics and artifical inteligence are very useful. Firstly, it can help human make great new inventions and innovatons for improvs life. For the insistence, robots are used to explore extream environments likd deep ocean or out of space. No human can go there but robots can. Also robots are used for many factory work and other dificult and danger jobs. This help protect human life. Further more robots can works much faster and very precise compare to humans. Robots no need rest or salary so more effectif and produtive. In this ways, robots gives many advantages to society and human life and this is main reason peoples support them. However, other sides have valid criticism about robotics. They argues that robots can have harmfull consekwenses for human race. Main concern is robots taking over many jobs of humans. If robots replacing factory and offise workers, many peoples will be unemplyment. This can lead soceity problems like homeless and crime. Another dangers is robots becomes too inteligent and powerful, they may be out of human controll. Like in science fiction movies, robots rebellion against humans and take over the world. This is exaggerate but still valid consern. Robots can also make people lazy and dependant on technology instead of improving themself. To sum up, I belief robots and artificial inteligense have both good and bad potensial impact on human socety. It have many usefull benefits for inovation and making life easer. But it also has risks and problems if not used carefully. I think humans need find balans and put limit on robotics. We shuld use robots to help us but not let them replace human intelegence and skills. If we can acheve this balance, robots will be very good thing for future of human civilisasion.

Families who send their children to private school should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

I am not agree with statement that families who send they children to private schools should not pay taxes for support state education. I think it is not fear for the families and also for the society as hole. First of all, even if a family sends their children to a private school, they still benefit from the state education system in many ways. For example, the parents themselves likely received their education from state schools, and they may have friends or relatives who have children in state schools. Additionally, a well-educated population benefits everyone in society, regardless of where they received their education. It is important that all members of society contribute to this common good. Secondly, exempting certain families from paying education taxes would create an unfair burden on those who do have to pay. If some families were allowed to opt out of paying taxes for state schools, the tax burden would fall more heavily on the remaining families. This could lead to resentment and division within communities. It is important that everyone contributes their fair share to support the education system. Finally, allowing families to opt out of paying education taxes could lead to a decline in the quality of state schools. If fewer people are paying into the system, there will be less money available to fund education. This could lead to larger class sizes, fewer resources, and a lower quality of education overall. This would be detrimental to students in state schools and to society as a whole. In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the idea that families who send their children to private schools should be exempt from paying taxes to support state education. It is important that all members of society contribute to the education system, regardless of whether they personally use it or not. Exempting some families from this responsibility would be unfair and could have negative consequences for everyone.

"The Importance of Environmental Conservation in Modern Society"

Environmental conservation has become an important topics in modern society. As the population of the world grows, there are increasing pressure on natural resources and environment. This essay will discuss why environmental conservation is so important and what can be done to promotes it. First of all, environmental conservation is crucial for maintaining the health of the planet and all living things. Without efforts to conserve the environment, many species of plants and animals may become extinct. Deforestation, pollution, and climate change are all major threats to biodiversity. If we do not take steps to protect the environment, we risk losing valuable ecosystem and the benefits they provide. Secondly, conserving the environment is important for human health and well-being. Pollution of air, water, and soil can leads to serious health problems for people. For example, air pollutions can cause respiratory illnesses, while contaminated water can lead to diseases such as cholera and typhoid. By protecting the environment, we can help to prevent these health issues and ensure that people have access to clean air, water, and healthy food. In addition, environmental conservation is important for economic reasons. Many industries, such as tourism and agriculture, depends on healthy environment. If natural resources are depleted or ecosystems are damaged, it can have negative impacts on these industries and the people who rely on them for their livelihoods. By investing in environmental conservation, we can help to support sustainable economic development. Overall, it is clear that environmental conservation is a critical issue in modern society. We must take steps to protect natural resources, preserve biodiversity, and ensure that the planet remains healthy for future generations. This can involves a range of actions, from reducing waste and pollution to supporting conservation efforts and sustainable development practices. By working together to prioritize environmental conservation, we can create a more sustainable and resilient world for all.

Some people think sports games are important for society while others believe they should be taken as a leisure activity. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Sports games has bin a topic of many discuss for long time. There is two opinin about it, some think this games important to socaity and also others take as laisure activ. I will analasis both view and than give my perspactive. On one hand, sport are very important part in sociaty. It is usefull for health and also buld carictar. When people play sport, they lern about teamwork and leadership which are key skills in life. For example, in fotball players nid to working together to score gol, dis teaches cooperate. Also, sport incorage fitnes and activ lifestyle which help reduse obasity and other helth ishues. Govarmint also suports sports to promote helthy people and nation. However, other peoples belief sport shuld be just a hobby or free time activ. They argue that sports take too much time from other important thing like work, study and family. Some athlete spend many hours training which leaves small time for anything alse. This can nagatively affect their parformance in school or job. Moreover, too much focus on sport can lead to injurys and helth problems spesaly for professional players. In my view, i belive balance approch is best. Sport defanitely has many benefits for individul and society as i mantioned before. But it shuld not be the only priority in life. People need spend time on educat and career also family and freinds to live well-rounded life. If someone want to take sport siriously, dey need carefull plan their schedule and make sure day still attend to odar responsabilities. With good time manag, sport can be valuble part of life without compromisin odar aspects. In conclus, playing sports has both advantag and disadvtg depanding how its aproched. There is no doubt dat it contribut positvly to fysical and mental well-being and teaches impotent life skils. But lik evrything else, too much of it can be harmfull so moderation is key to get most banefits and maintain balanc life.

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: Modern biking sports like downhill mountain biking and freestyle BMX have become very popular in recent years. What do you think are the reasons for their increasing popularity? Do you think these types of sports are too dangerous and should have age restrictions? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

Biking sports becoming more poplar nowdays, expecially the extreme ones like downhill mountain biking and freestyle BMXing. Their are probably lot of reasons why more and more people like to do these kind of biking sports. One reason I think is because the equipments are easier to buy. In the past, special bicycle is hard to find and very expensive but know with internet and global trade, any one can order a good mountain bike or BMX and have deliver to they're home. Also more places to practice the sports, government and private company build skate park and bike trail in many city so people have place to go. But main reason is probly the excite and adreneline rush that come with the sports. Going very fast down a step hill or doing flip and trick give such a thrill, cannot get from traditinal sports. In todays world many people need to find that feeling, want to push limits and try crazy thing, that make them feel alive. But ofcourse their is risk, these extreme sports can be quite danger, easy to crash and get hurt badly. So I beleive their should be some restrict, like requiring safty gear and maybe age limit for competion. But in general, if done responibly, it ok for pepole to take the risk for fun and excitment in they're life. Cant always play it safe! In summary, modern biking sports popular because equipments are available, more place to practice, and people seek thrill and excitment. Need to be caution of dangers but overall good for sociaty to have these kind of chalenge sports. As long as done safely, no need for too much govern control or ban the sports.

Aircrafts are consuming more fuel than cars and creating more pollution. Some say that non-essential use of aircrafts should be banned, like international flights. Do you agree or disagree?

I am agree that aircrafts are using more fuel than cars and making more pollutions. It is true that international flights should be banned if they are not essential. There are several reasons why I think this way. Firstly, aircrafts are consuming a lot of fuel when they fly. They need to use a lot of fuel to fly in the sky and travel long distance. This is making a lot of pollution in the air. The pollution is bad for the environment and for people's health. If we can reduce the number of flights, we can reduce the amount of pollution in the air. Secondly, many people take international flights for leisure and tourism. While tourism is important for the economy, it is not essential for people's daily lives. People can still travel within their own country or take other modes of transportation like trains or buses. Banning non-essential international flights can help to reduce the amount of pollution caused by aircrafts. However, there are also some arguments against banning international flights. Some people may argue that international flights are important for businesses and global trade. They may say that banning flights will hurt the economy and make it harder for people to do business. While this is a valid concern, I believe that we need to prioritize the environment and people's health over economic growth. In conclusion, I agree that non-essential international flights should be banned to reduce the amount of pollution caused by aircrafts. While there may be some economic impacts, the benefits to the environment and people's health outweigh the costs. We need to take action to reduce the amount of pollution in the air and protect our planet for future generations.

These days, many university courses are offered through the internet. Some people think that online teaching has more advantages than conventional classroom teaching or lectures, while others claim that there are significant disadvantages. Do the benefits of online teaching outweigh the disadvantages?

In these day, online education through internet has becoming more popular in college and university. Many peoples think internet teaching is superior compare to traditional classroom teaching, but others say it have many flaws. In my opinion, i think the advantages of web-based teaching is greater than drawbacks. First of all, online classes is very convenient and flexible. Student can study in own time and schedule, not need to physically attend classroom everytime. This mean they can balance study with other responsibility like working or taking care of family. Also you can access course material anytime on internet, and dont have to carrying heavy textbooks everywhere. In addition, e-learning also more affordable than classroom teaching in many way. No need to pay money for room and board near school. Save gas money from not needing drive or take bus to campus daily. And the digital textbook much cheaper than paper ones. However, some argue that online educate has issues. They say its hard for student to focus and motivate themself when learning alone. No instant feedback or interaction with teacher and classmate. Student might feel isolated and unmotivated. Its true these problems might occur for some peoples. But i believe these disadvantage can be overcome. If student feel lonely, they should join online study group or forum with other classmate. They can also email professor and TA for question and discussion. And if self-motivate is difficult, they can make reward system for complete assignments, like watch favorite show or buy nice thing. In conclusion, while internet-based teaching might has some flaws, i think the benefits like flexibility, convenience, affordability outweight the drawbacks. With some effort to stay engaged and motivated, most student can succeed in online course just as well as classroom setting.

In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of aging populations.

In many developed country, people live longer life than before. This trend have some problems effect to individualls and the society. I think goverments should do something to reduce this impacts from population aging. Firstly, longer life bring many challange for person and society. Old people have more health problems like heart disease or demetia, so they need a lot of care and medical treatement. This put pressure on healthcare sistem and cost a lot of money for goverment and familys. Also when people live longer, there are fewer young people to work and support the econmy. This can make it difficult for bussinesses to find enough worker and can lead to economic decline in nations. I belief there are some things that can be done to adress these issues. One importent step is for goverments to invest more in healthcare and research to help people stay healthy as they age. This could include things like better preventative care, more support for chronic disease management, or funding for new medical technologis. An other idea is to encourage people to stay in the workforce longer by offering flexible work arrangements or retraining programs for older worker. Immigration could also help by bring in younger people to balance the aging population. In conclusion, while rising life expectancy create some problems, it is posible to reduce the negative impacts. By investing in healthcare, supporting older workers, and welcoming immigrats, society can better handle the challanges of an aging populace. Addressing this issue will be crucial for the future prosperty and well-being of developed nations.

The pie chart shows the percentage of persons arrested in the five years ending 1994 and the bar chart shows the most recent reasons for arrest. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie chart is representing percentage for persons who have been arrestinged in five years until 1994 and the barchart is showing the reasons most recently for being arrest. To begin, in the pie chart we can see that over half (55%) of arrest happened in 1993-1994. This number is much bigger compared to other years like 1990-1991 which only have 5% arrest rate. The arrest keep increasing from year by year and reach peak at most recent years. Moreover, when we look at bar chart for reason of arrest, the "other" category is highestly with around 7.8%. Followingly is the larceny-theft at about 7.0% and 3rd is the drug abuse violations approximate 5.9%. The lowestly reasons are fraud and driving while influenced at around 1.3% each. In conclusion, from the data it showing that arrest is increasing a lot in recentest years ending 1994. Also, most common reasons are other category, larceny-theft and drugs abuse violations. It suggesting maybe goverment should take actions for prevent such crimes.

Despite a large number of gyms, a sedentary lifestyle is gaining popularity in the contemporary world. What problems are associated with this? What solutions can you suggest?

In nowdays world, it is become more and more populare to be not active, even though there are many fitness centers available for people. This essay will discus the issues related to this trend and suggest some ways to solving them. Firstly, one of biggest problem with sedentary lifestyles is that it can lead to various health problems. When people spend too much time siting and not moving their bodies, they are at a higher risk of obesity, heart disease, and other cronic conditions. For example, studies have shown that people who sit for long periods of time are more likely to develope diabetes and have a shorter lifespan overall. Another issue with this trend is that it can have negative impact on mental health. Exercise is known to releasing endorphins and improving mood, so people who don't engage in regular physical activities may be more prone to depression and anxiety. Additionally, spending too much time indoors can lead to feelings of isolation and loneliness, which can further exacerbate mental health issues. To address these problems, there are several solutions that can be implemented. One option is to promote the benefits of regular exercise and encourage people to make it a priority in they daily lives. This could involve launching public health campaigns that highlight positive impacts of physical activity on both physical and mental well-being. Another solution is to make gyms and fitness centers more accessible and affordable for everyone. This could include offering discounted memberships or subsidies for low-income individuals, as well as increasing number of community-based fitness programms. By making it easier for people to access these recources, we can help them to incorporate exercise into their daily routines more easily. In conclusion, the rise of sedentary lifestyles is a worrying trend that can have serious consequences for both physical and mental health. However, by promoting importance of regular exercise and making fitness resources more widely available, we can help to mitigate these problems and encourage people to lead more active and healthy lives.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: Art Throughout history, art has been used to express ideas, feelings, and beliefs. Some people believe that the government should provide financial support for artists and the arts. Others believe that this is not an appropriate use of public funds. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

In this essay, I will discuss about the topic of art and whether government should give financial support to artists or not. There are different views on this topic, and I will explain both sides and then give my opinion. On the one hand, some people think that government have responsibility to support artists and the arts. They believe that art is important part of our culture and society, and it need to be preserved and promoted. Without financial support from government, many artists may struggle to make living and continue creating their art. Additionally, government support can help to make art more accessible to public, by funding museums, galleries, and other cultural institutions. On the other hand, there are those who argue that government should not use public funds to support artists and the arts. They believe that art is a personal pursuit and that artists should be responsible for finding own ways to support themselves. They also argue that there are many other important areas where government need to spend money, such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure. Providing financial support to artists may not be the best use of limited public funds. In my opinion, I think that government should provide some level of support for artists and the arts, but it need to be balanced with other priorities. Art is important part of our culture and history, and it can bring many benefits to society, such as promoting creativity, education, and cultural understanding. However, I also recognize that government have limited resources and need to make difficult choices about where to allocate funds. One possible solution could be for government to provide targeted support for specific art projects or initiatives that have clear public benefit. For example, government could fund public art installations, educational programs for young people, or cultural events that bring communities together. This way, government can support the arts in way that is strategic and aligned with broader social goals. In conclusion, the question of whether government should provide financial support for artists and the arts is complex one with valid arguments on both sides. While I believe that art is important and deserving of some level of public support, I also recognize the need for government to balance this with other priorities. Ultimately, the best approach may be to find middle ground where government can support the arts in targeted and strategic way that maximizes benefits to society as whole.

In the modern world, many employees lack soft skills such as communication and working in teams. What are the main causes of this problem? What are the effects of the lack of such skills? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

These days, a big number of employee they do not have the soft skils, for example communiction, and teamwork. There are several reasons for this issue and it has many negative effect. One of main cause is the education system focus only in hard skills like the technical knowledge. The student spend many time on study specific subject but they was not taugh important skills to success in workplace like how to talk effective and colaborate with coworker. In addition, in this modern era many people addicted to technolgy like handphone. They only interact with other people online instead of face by face, so they do not know well how to communicate in the real life situation. The lack of soft skills has many negatives impact. First, the worker difficult to work together because they cannot communicate well and dont understand how to be a good team mate. This will lead less productivity in the company overall. It also cause stress and conflict between employes because of misunderstanding. Other severe effect is the worker who lack soft skill struggle to build relationships and lead people. Its hard for them to get promoted to higher position like manager or supervisor. They will stuck in same position for long time even if they are smart because they cannot handle people. In conclusion, poor soft skills is serious issue caused by wrong focus of education and too much tecnology. It makes hard for employee to work in team, less productive, and difficult to advance career. The school should put more effort to teach this skill from young age, and employee must practice communicate with others too improve.

Why do you want to travel?

I wanting to travel because it can beingin different experiences and open my eyes. When I go to another places, I am seeing new things that i never seen before. This can be help me learn about world and make my knowledge more wider. Also, travel is letting me meet new people from the various cultures. I can make friend with them and learning about thier lifes. We share our stories together and I can understand how people living in different ways. This help me become more open mind and accept other people differences. Travel also giving me chance to relax and take break from daily life. I can forget about the stress and just enjoy being in new place. I can trying new food and doing activities that I normally cant do at house. This refresh my mind and body so I come back feel more energetic. In conclusion, I wanting to travel for many reason. It bring me new experienses, let me meet new people, and giving me chance to relax. Travel is important part of life and I always look forward for next trip.

Books are a great source of knowledge and entertainment. Why do you like to read?

I like read books becose they are providing me with the many informations and knowledges. When I reading a book, I feel like I am travel to different world and I can learning about new things and cultures. Books also helping me to improve my English skills and vocabulary, as I am not a native speaker of English language. Another reason why I enjoy reading is that it allow me to relax and escape from the stress of daily life. When I am read a good book, I can forget about my problems and worries for a little while. Reading is also a great way to spend my free time, especially when I am alone or bored. I can just pick up a book and start reading, and before I know it, hours have passed by. In addition, books can also be a source of inspiration and motivation for me. When I read about successful people or characters who have overcome challenges and achieved their goals, it gives me the courage and determination to pursue my own dreams. Books can also help me to develop my critical thinking skills and broaden my perspective on different issues and topics. In conclusion, I love reading books because they provide me with knowledge, entertainment, relaxation, inspiration, and personal growth opportunities. Books are truly a valuable resource that I will always cherish and appreciate.

In many workplaces, online communication is becoming more common than meeting face to face. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

Nowadays, in most of workplaces peoples communicate through online rather than meating face to face. In my opinion I belive that this development have more advantages than the disadvantages. One of the main advantage is that online communication save a lot of time. Instead going to office and have a meeting, employees can just talk through video conference or sending emails. This save time for traveling and also allow people to work from home, which is more convenience. Moreover, online communication is also more effective because it allow people to share documents and files easily. For example, if someone want to share a presentation, they can just attach it in an email rather than print out many copies. However, there are also some disadvantage of online communication. One of them is that it can be less personal than face to face meeting. When people meet in persons, they can see each other's facial expressions and body language, which can help to build relationships and trust. Online communication can sometimes lead to misunderstanding because it is harder to convey tone and emotions through text or video. Additionally, online communication can also be less secure than face to face meetings, as there is a risk of sensitive informations being hacked or leaked. In conclusion, while there are some disadvantage to online communication in the workplace, I believe that the advantages outweigh them. Online communication is more convenient, efficient, and cost-effective than face to face meetings, and it allows for greater flexibility in how and where people work.