IELTS Writing Sample Essays and Model Answers

The pie chart below shows the origins by continent of all students who came to England from abroad to study in 2010. The bar chart shows the numbers of students coming to England from seven Far Eastern countries in the same year. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

In my observation, the provided diagrams give information about international students studying in England during 2010, showing their continental origins and specific numbers from Far East countries. When I look at pie chart, it clearly shows that Asia was biggest source of foreign students in England. I think more than half of all international students came from this continent, while European students were making up about quarter of total number. The other continents like Africa and Americas were having smaller portions, but still significant. From bar chart data, I can see that China was sending most students to England among Far Eastern countries. If I remember correctly, the number was reaching almost 50,000 students, which is very big number. Japan and South Korea were following after China, but their numbers were much smaller, maybe around 15,000 students each. Other countries like Taiwan and Thailand were having even less students studying in England. What interesting to me is that even though some countries were sending less students, they still chose England for education. For example, Malaysia and Singapore had smaller numbers, but they still participated in international education. I think this shows that English education was very attractive for Asian students during that time. In conclusion, it is clear to me that Asian continent, especially China, was dominating international student numbers in England during 2010. European students were also significant, but not as many as Asian students. This pattern shows that England was very popular destination for international education, particularly for students from Far East.

Globalization is creating a world of one culture and destroying national identity. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

In today's world, globalization is making big changes in how people live and think everywhere. I partially agree that it affects our cultures, but I don't think it completely destroys national identities. First of all, it is true that globalization makes many things become same in different countries. For example, young people in my country are wearing similar clothes like people in America and Europe, and we are eating at McDonald's and drinking Starbucks coffee. Also when I look at social media, I see that people from different countries are sharing same type of content and following same trends. This makes culture become more similar between countries. However, I believe national identity is still very strong in many places. In my experience, even though we use international brands and watch Netflix shows, we still keep our traditional festivals and customs. Like in my country, we still celebrate our new year with traditional food and family gatherings, and young people still respect these traditions very much. Also, local languages continue to be important even though English is becoming more common for business and internet. Furthermore, I think globalization sometimes makes people want to protect their culture more. When I see how some countries are making effort to keep their traditional arts and music alive, it shows that national identity doesn't disappear so easy. Many people are proud of their unique culture and want to share it with others, which actually makes cultural diversity more interesting in global world. In conclusion, while globalization definitely brings similar lifestyle patterns across countries, I believe it doesn't completely destroy national identities. Instead, it creates a mix where modern global culture exists together with traditional values and customs. This balance is making our world both connected and culturally rich at same time.

Discuss the following view: Financial education should be included as a mandatory subject in schools to prepare students for managing money effectively. Write at least 250 words.

In today's world, many young people are facing problems with their money because they don't know how to manage it properly. I strongly believe that schools must teach financial education to all students because it will help them in their future life. First of all, when I was student in school, we learned many subjects like mathematics and science, but nobody taught us about managing money. This made me feel very confused when I started working and getting salary. Many of my friends also had same problem, they didn't know what to do with money they earned. If we learned about finance in school, maybe we could save more money and make better choices. Moreover, I think children these days are spending too much money on things they don't need. They buy expensive phones and clothes because they see other people buying them. But they don't understand about saving money or making good financial decisions. When schools teach financial education, students will learn important things like how to make budget and why saving money is good for future. Another reason why financial education is important is because life is getting more expensive. In my country, prices of everything are going up, and people need to be smart with their money. If students learn about money management early, they will know how to live better when they grow up. They will understand about things like loans and credit cards, which can be dangerous if you don't know how to use them right. In conclusion, I strongly support that financial education should be mandatory in schools. This will help young people to be more responsible with money and prepare them for real life challenges. If schools start teaching this subject now, future generations will be better at managing their finances.

Some people believe that smartphones have become an essential part of modern life, while others think they can have negative effects. Discuss both advantages and disadvantages of using smartphones. Write at least 250 words.

In today's world, smartphones have become very important for most people. They help us do many things, but they also make some problems for us. I will discuss both good and not good points about using smartphones in our daily life. First of all, smartphones give us many benefits in our life. The most important thing is that we can contact with our family and friends anywhere and anytime. For example, when I am at university, I always use my phone to message my parents and tell them I am okay. Also, smartphones help us to find information very fast. When I don't know something, I just search it on my phone and get answer quickly. This is very useful for students like me who need to learn new things all time. However, using smartphones too much can make some problems for people. One big problem is that many people spend too much time looking at their phones. I see my friends always checking their social media during class, and they cannot focus on what teacher is saying. Another problem is that smartphones can make our eyes tired and give us bad sleep. Sometimes I use my phone before sleeping, and then I cannot sleep well in night. Furthermore, smartphones can make people less social in real life. When I go to cafe with my friends, I notice that everyone is looking at their phones instead of talking to each other. This makes me feel sad because we should enjoy time together instead of looking at screens. In conclusion, I think smartphones bring both advantages and disadvantages to our lives. While they help us communicate and find information easily, we must be careful not to let them control our lives too much. It is important to find good balance between using smartphones and having real life interactions with people.

Social networking websites such as Facebook, Twitter and Instagram improve international relationships as people all over the world are free to communicate and exchange ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?

I strongly agree that social media platforms help people make better connections across countries. In my opinion, these websites give us many good chances to learn about different cultures and make friends from other places, even though there are some problems we need to think about. First of all, social networks make it very easy for me to talk with people from everywhere. When I use Facebook, I can join groups about things I like, such as cooking or music, and then I meet many people who also like these things. For example, last year I joined a group about learning English, and now I have friends from Brazil and Japan who practice speaking with me every week. We share many stories about our countries and learn lots of interesting things from each other. Another good thing is that social media helps us understand what happens in other countries better. Before, we only knew what TV news showed us, but now we can see real people posting about their daily life in different places. Like when I see my friend from Italy posting pictures of their food or telling about their festivals, I feel like I understand their culture more deeply. This makes me feel more close to people from other countries. However, we must remember that sometimes people only show good things on social media. They might post only happy pictures or nice stories, which doesn't show the whole truth about their life or country. Also, sometimes people can be mean or unfriendly online, which can make relationships between people from different countries worse instead of better. In conclusion, I believe social networking websites are very helpful for making international friendships and understanding other cultures better. Even though there are some problems, the good things are more important. These platforms give us chances to learn about each other and make the world feel smaller and more friendly.

Some people believe that mental health should be given the same importance as physical health in healthcare systems and workplace policies. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In recent years, many people start to talk about mental health more openly. I strongly agree that mental health deserve same attention like physical health, because they both affect quality of life and productivity of people. First of all, mental health problems can impact person's daily activities same as physical illness. When I was studying at university, I notice how stress and anxiety make it difficult for many students to concentrate on their studies. Some of my friends who had depression, they could not attend classes regularly, similar to those who had physical sickness. This show that mental health conditions are equally serious and need proper treatment. Moreover, good mental health is very important for work performance and economy. Many workers who suffer from mental health issues, they cannot work efficiently and sometimes need to take long breaks from their job. I read article about how companies who provide mental health support to employees, they see better results in productivity. If we invest in mental health care same as physical health care, it will benefit both individuals and society. Furthermore, mental and physical health are connected very closely. When someone has mental health problems for long time, it can lead to physical symptoms like headaches or sleeping problems. Similarly, chronic physical illness often cause anxiety and depression. This shows that both types of health need equal attention from healthcare systems. In conclusion, I strongly believe mental health should receive same importance as physical health. The impact of mental health on daily life, work productivity, and its connection to physical well-being make it crucial to provide equal support and treatment options. If society recognize this importance, it will help create better healthcare system for everyone.

Many young people choose to take a year out between finishing school and starting university in order to gain work experience or to travel. The experience of non-academic life this offers benefits the individual when they return to education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

I strongly agree that taking gap year is very beneficial for students before they start university studies. This practice helps young people to get valuable experience and become more mature before continuing education. In this essay, I will explain my opinion about this topic. First of all, when students work during gap year, they learn many important things about real life. In my country, lots of students never worked before university, so they don't understand how difficult it is to earn money. I had friend who worked in restaurant for one year after school, and he told me that this experience helped him to appreciate education more better. Also, when young people work, they develop responsibility and time management skills, which are very useful for university life. Another benefit is that traveling during gap year makes students more independent and open-minded. When I finished school, my cousin went to Australia for 6 months, and she changed so much. She became more confident person and learned to solve problems by herself. I think traveling teaches us things we cannot learn from books, like understanding different cultures and dealing with unexpected situations. Moreover, gap year gives young people time to think careful about their future career. Many students choose university courses without really knowing what they want, but after working or traveling, they understand their interests more clear. This means they make better decisions about their studies and are more motivated when they start university. In conclusion, I believe gap year is very good opportunity for personal growth and development before university. The experience students gain from working or traveling helps them to become more mature and prepared for higher education. Therefore, I completely support the idea that non-academic experiences benefit students when they return to studies.

A lot of students these days want to study abroad in countries that are different from their own. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of studying in a foreign country.

When I think about studying in other countries, I remember how many of my friends dreamed about this opportunity. I believe this topic is very important to discuss, because more and more students choose to study abroad every year. In this essay, I will talk about good things and also some problems that students face when they study in foreign countries. First of all, studying abroad gives students many good chances for their future. When I talked with people who studied in other countries, they always say how this experience changed their life in good way. Students can learn new language much better when they live in country where people speak this language everyday. Also, they meet new friends from different cultures, which helps them understand world better. In my opinion, these connections are very valuable for future work opportunities. However, there are also some difficult things students must deal with. The biggest problem is that living in different country costs lot of money, and many families cannot afford this. Another thing that makes it hard is feeling lonely, because students are far from their family and old friends. Sometimes I heard from my cousin who studies abroad that she feels very sad when she misses important family events. Also, some students have trouble with different education system and must work extra hard to understand how everything works. In conclusion, I think studying in foreign country has more positive sides than negative ones. Even though students face some challenges like money problems and feeling homesick, the experience they get is very valuable for their future. I believe if student has chance to study abroad, they should take this opportunity because it will help them grow as person and give them better job opportunities in future.

Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

In my opinion, I think online university courses are mostly positive development in education system today. I will explain why I believe this and give some examples from my own experience with studying. First thing that makes online courses good is flexibility they give to students. When I started my university last year, I could watch lectures any time I wanted, which helped me a lot because I was also working part-time job. Many students are having similar situation like me, and they need to balance their study with other responsibilities in life. Another benefit I notice is that online learning makes education more accessible to many people. For example, my friend who lives in small city far from big universities, she can now study at good university without moving to expensive city. This save lot of money for her family, and she still gets quality education. Also, international students they can study at foreign universities without visa problems. However, I must say there are some problems too with online classes. Sometimes internet connection is not good, and this make it difficult to follow the teacher properly. Another thing I experienced is that when you study alone at home, you miss the chance to make friends and learn from other students, which I think is important part of university life. Despite these challenges, I strongly believe that benefits of online courses are bigger than problems they have. The way they make education more flexible and accessible to more people is very important in today's world. As technology keeps getting better, I think these online programs will become even more effective in future.

The line graph shows the percentage of urban/suburban and rural households with internet access in a European country between 1999 and 2004.

The line graph illustrates how internet access changed in both urban/suburban areas and rural regions of one European country during the period from 1999 to 2004. In 1999, only small number of households had internet connection in this country. Urban and suburban areas showed higher percentage, which was about 12%, while rural areas were having much less internet users with approximately 5% of households connected to internet. The next few years showed big improvements in both areas. By year 2001, urban and suburban households that had internet grew up to 25%, and rural areas also increased but more slowly, reaching around 15%. This difference between city and countryside areas continued throughout the period. When we look at the end of period in 2004, we can see that internet access in urban/suburban regions reached almost 45% of all households, which is very big increase from beginning. Rural households also grew a lot during this time, but still stayed behind with about 30% having internet connection. In conclusion, even though both urban/suburban and rural areas experienced significant growth in internet access during these years, city regions always maintained higher percentage of connected households compared to countryside areas. The gap between these two regions remained quite stable throughout the observed period.

Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In my opinion, I strongly agree that social networks have brought many negative effects to people and our society. I will explain my reasons in the following paragraphs why I think like this. First of all, social media makes people spend too much time online instead of doing other important things. For example, when I check my Facebook in the morning, I always end up scrolling for one or two hours, and then I am late for my classes. Many of my friends also have same problem, they cannot stop looking at their phones during study time or even when we meet together. Another point I want to talk about is that these platforms make people feel not good about themselves. When I see my friends posting pictures of their amazing holidays or expensive things they bought, it makes me feel bad because I cannot afford such things. This kind of comparison is not healthy for mental health, and I think many young people are suffering from this problem nowadays. Furthermore, social networking has changed how people communicate with each other in real life. Before, people used to visit their friends and family members to talk face to face, but now everyone just sends messages or likes photos. I remember when I was young, my family always visited our neighbors on weekends, but now we just chat on Facebook and rarely meet in person. In conclusion, while social media might have some benefits, I believe its negative effects on individuals and society are very serious. It is important that people try to limit their time on these platforms and focus more on real-life connections and activities.

Write about 250 words about the basic stages of child development and why it is important for parents to understand them. Include relevant examples from your own observation or experience.

I want to share my thoughts about how children grow up and why parents need to know about this important topic. From what I have learned during my studies, children go through many stages when they develop, and each stage is very important for their future. When babies are very small, maybe first year or so, they learn basic things like how to smile and how to grab things with their hands. I have seen this with my little cousin who always try to catch everything around him. This stage is really important because babies start to understand the world around them, and parents must give them lots of attention during this time. After that time, children start learning to walk and talk, which happens around age of 2 years. This is very exciting time for family because children become more active and start to express what they want. I remember when my neighbor's daughter started to speak, she was saying same words again and again, but her parents were very patient with her. If parents understand this stage, they can help their children better. Later, when children go to school, they develop different skills like reading and making friends. This stage is also very important because children learn how to be part of society. Parents who know about this stage can support their children better and help them with their problems. In my opinion, understanding these stages helps parents to give better care to their children. When parents know what to expect, they can make better decisions about how to help their children grow up healthy and happy.

Nowadays, animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In recent years, the topic of animal testing has become very important discussion in our society. While some people think we should stop doing experiments on animals because it makes them suffer, other people say these tests help humans a lot. I will talk about both sides and share what I think about this difficult problem. Many people believe that doing tests on animals is very wrong thing. They say animals can feel pain like humans do, and we don't have right to make them suffer. In my country, I have seen many protests where people say we must protect animals from such cruel treatment. Also, these people often say there are new technologies we can use instead of animal testing, so we don't need to hurt animals anymore. However, other group of people think these experiments are necessary for human progress. They say many important medicines that save people's lives were made possible because of animal testing. For example, my friend who works in hospital told me that new cancer treatments are tested on animals first to make sure they are safe for humans. Without these tests, many people could die from dangerous medicines. From my perspective, I think animal testing should continue but with very strict rules. Even though I love animals very much and don't want them to suffer, I understand that sometimes we need these tests to save human lives. I believe we should try to find better ways to test medicines, but until we have good alternatives, careful animal testing is necessary evil. To conclude, while animal testing is difficult moral issue, I think benefits to human health are too important to ignore. The best solution is to keep doing these experiments but make sure we treat animals as humanely as possible and always look for better testing methods.

Many people argue that what sets today's young people apart from their parents' and grandparents' generations is their lack of physical activity. The younger generation spends excessive time playing computer games, engaging in social media conversations, or watching television, rather than participating in active pursuits. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

I strongly agree that young people nowadays do less exercise than older generations. This essay will explain my thoughts about this problem and why I think it is happening. The biggest reason why we do less sports is because we have many different entertainments at home. When I was small child, my mother always tell me stories about how she played outside with friends every day after school, but now everything changed. I spend lot of time playing games on my computer because they are very interesting, and all my friends also do this. Sometimes we play together online, but we never meet to play football like our parents did. Another thing that make young people less active is that we use phones all the time. Every day I check Instagram and TikTok many times, and when I start watching videos, I cannot stop. My grandmother say she never understood why we look at phones so much, but for me and my friends it is normal thing to do. We prefer to chat on WhatsApp than go outside and do some activities. However, I think it is not completely our fault that we exercise less. The world is different now, and we have more pressure from school and study. When my father was young, he had more free time to play sports, but now I must study very hard to get good grades. Also, in many cities, there are not many places where young people can do sports safely. In conclusion, I believe that young generation definitely do less physical activities than their parents and grandparents did. While technology and social media are main reasons for this, we should also consider that lifestyle and education requirements have changed a lot. Maybe we need to find new ways to balance screen time with exercise that fit with modern life.

In some countries, prison is seen as the solution to crime. However, some people believe that giving people a better education is a better way to prevent them committing crimes. To what extent do you agree or disagree with these ideas? Give your opinions based on your knowledge and experiences.

I strongly believe education is better than prison for stopping crimes. When I think about this topic, I remember many things from my country and what I see in other places too. First thing I want to talk about is why prisons not work so good. In my experience, when people go to prison, they meet other criminals and sometimes learn more bad things. I have read article that say many people who went prison, they do crimes again after they come out. This is because they don't learn good skills in prison, just sit there and become more angry at society. Also prison is very expensive for government, they need lot of money to keep people there. Another important point I think about is education can help stop crimes before they happen. When I was in school, I saw how education give people more chances in life. If someone can read good and do math, they can find job more easy. Also when people study, they learn about right and wrong things, and they understand better why some things are bad for society. In my opinion, if government spend more money for schools instead prison, maybe less people do crimes. But I must say both things are little bit important. Some dangerous people need go to prison to protect others, this is true. However, I think we should focus more on education, especially for young people who might do bad things if they don't have good opportunities. In my country, when government made better schools in poor areas, less young people joined bad groups. To conclude, while prisons are sometimes necessary, I strongly believe education is much better way to prevent crimes. If we give people good education and chances to make better life, they will not want to do crimes. Government should put more money in schools and teaching programs instead of building more prisons.

The graph below shows the average daily sales of selected food items at the Brisk Café, by season. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph represent average daily sales for different food at Brisk Café during four seasons. Overall, there is clear pattern that hot drinks and soup are more popular in winter, while cold drinks and ice cream have higher sales in summer months. Looking at hot beverages and warm food items, coffee sales reach their peak of around 180 cups per day during winter season, but they drop significant to approximately 85 cups in summer time. Similarly, soup follow same trend where winter sales are almost triple comparing to summer period, with nearly 90 bowls sold daily in cold months and only 30 bowls in warm season. In contrast, cold drinks and ice cream show opposite patterns in their sales figures. Ice cream sales are highest in summer with 160 units being sold every day, while in winter time they decrease dramatic to just 25 units per day. Cold drinks also having similar pattern - summer sales reach 140 cups daily but go down to 40 cups during winter months. When we look at spring and autumn sales, they usually stay between summer and winter numbers for all products. However, interesting thing to note is that spring sales are generally bit higher than autumn ones for cold items, while autumn shows slightly better performance for hot drinks and soup. This probably because of temperature differences between these transition seasons.

Children are now less active in their free time than in the past. Therefore, sports lessons must be compulsory in schools. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

I strongly agree with the idea that sports classes should be mandatory in schools because children nowadays spend less time doing physical activities. In this essay, I will explain my reasons and share some examples from my experience. First of all, when I was young student, I remember how we always played outside after school with friends. But now, situation is completely different. Many children prefer staying at home and playing video games or watching videos on their phones. This make them very inactive, and I think it is not good for their health. In my country, doctors say that more young people have problems with their weight than before. Another important point is that sports lessons in school help students to learn about teamwork and make new friends. From my experience as student, I can say that during sports classes, we learned how to work together to win games. Also, when we played basketball or football, we had to communicate a lot with other students, which helped us to improve our social skills. These skills are very important for future life. Furthermore, regular exercise at school can help students to concentrate better in other subjects. I remember when we had sports class in morning, I felt more energetic and could focus better in mathematics and science lessons that came after. This is because physical activity makes our brain work better, as my biology teacher always told us. However, some people might say that students already have too many subjects to study. But I think health is most important thing, and without good health, students cannot study well. Also, sports classes don't need to be very long - even 45 minutes three times per week can make big difference. In conclusion, I strongly believe that making sports lessons compulsory in schools is very necessary step. This will help solve problem of inactive lifestyle among young people and give them many benefits for their health and social development. Schools must take responsibility to ensure students get enough physical activity during their education.

Some people think that there are things individuals can do to help prevent global climate change, while others believe that action by individuals is useless and that only governments and large businesses can make a difference. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

In recent years, the topic of climate change has become very important for many people. While some persons think individual actions can help with this problem, others believe only big companies and governments can do something useful. In my opinion, both individual and government actions are needed to solve this environmental crisis. On one side, many people say that individuals can make important changes to help environment. For example, when we choose to take bus instead of driving car, we make less pollution. Also, if we buy less plastic products and do recycling at home, we reduce waste that harm our planet. I have noticed in my country that more and more people start doing these small actions, and I think it shows how individuals can really help. However, other people think only governments and big companies can make real difference. They say that individual actions are too small to matter when big factories continue to make lots of pollution every day. For instance, one factory can produce more carbon in one day than many families in one year. Also, governments can make laws that force companies to be more green and give money to develop clean energy. These are things that normal people cannot do. I strongly believe that we need both individual and government actions together. While it is true that governments must make strict rules for companies, individual actions are also very important because they show companies and governments that people care about this problem. In my experience, when many people start doing something, like using less plastic bags, companies start to change their ways too. This happened in my city where many shops now offer paper bags because customers wanted them. In conclusion, although some people think individual actions are not useful for fighting climate change, I believe both personal and government efforts are necessary. If we want to solve this big problem, everyone must work together - from ordinary people to big companies and governments.

In many countries today, crime novels and TV crime dramas are becoming more and more popular. Why do you think these books and TV shows are popular? What is your opinion of crime fiction and TV crime dramas?

The crime novels and TV crime dramas becoming more popular in many countries today. I think this type of entertianment are popular for few reasons. Firstly, they are providing excitingg and thrilling experience for the viewers and readers. The suspence and mystery in the stories keep people engaged and curious to find out what happen next. People are enjoy trying to solve the crimes along with the characters. Secondly, crime fiction often explore the darker side of human nature and the complex moral dillemmas. This can be fascinating for people to think about and discuss. The stories can also provide insight into the criminal justice system and how it works or doesn't work. People are interested to learning about the different type of crimes and how they are investigated. In my opinion, crime novels and TV crime dramas can be entertain and thought-provoking. I enjoy reading crime novels from time to time as they are a good way to escape from the reallife and immerse yourself in a different world. However, I think it is important to remembering that these stories are fiction and not always realistic. They can sometimes glamorize crime or present oversimplified view of complex issues. In conclusion, the popularity of crime novels and TV crime dramas is likely due to their ability to providing thrills, mystery, and insight into human behaviour. While they can be enjoy as entertainment, it is important to consume them with a critical eye and not let them shape our view of reallife too much.

In many professional sports, there is an increase in the number of athletes using banned substances to improve their performance. What are the causes of this phenomenon and what are some of the possible solutions?

In recent years the cases of athletes taking disalowed drugs for enhance there performance in profesional sports are rising. This assay will examines the causes of this problem and suggest some possible solution. There are two main reasons why more and more sportpeople using banned substances these days. First is the pressure to win. As profesional sports becomes increasingly competitive, the athelete feels they must do whatever it takes for victory, even if it means cheating by consume performance enhancing drugs. Second cause is the huge financial awards for winning. Top athelete can earn millions of dollar from winning major championships, as well endoresment deals. The temtation of big money encourges some competitor to gain an unfair advantages through doping. However, there are several action that can be taken for tackle this issue. One solution is do more frecuent and random drug testing, both during and outside of competiton. This will make harder for atheletes to gets away with using banned sustance without beeing caught. Another possible measure are harsher penalties like lifetime bans for drug cheats, to deter others from doing same. If atheletes knows they will not only loose medals but potentially there entire career, most will think twice before dope. To conclude, the growing use of illegal drugs among profesional sportpeoples is driven by pressure to win and chase money. But more testing and stronger punishment could help reverse these trend. It is important for ensure integrity of sports that fans can belief in the athletes.

Many people have hobbies that they enjoy doing in their free time. What are some of the reasons people have hobbies? Discuss, giving specific examples to support your answer.

Many persons have hobbys that they enjoy very much in there free hours. There is lot of reasons why someone have a hobby, and I will discuss some from them. One reason is that hobby can helps to relax and reduce stress after long day at work or school. For example, my friend Jian likes to do gardening in her freetime. She say it helps her to forget about the pressures and feel calm, when she is taking care about the plants and watch them grow. Other reason for have a hobby is to learn new skill or knowledge. Many hobby, like playing musical instrument or painting, require practice and patience to became good at them. My brother started to learn guitar last year as a hobby, and now he can play some songs very good. It gives he a sense of achievement and satisfaction that he learning something new. In conclusion, there is different reasons why person choose to have a hobby in there free time. It can be for relax, learn new things, or just for enjoy. No matter the reasons, having a hobby is great way to spend freetime and bring more happiness in life.