IELTS Writing Sample Essays and Model Answers
The chart given shows the number of traveler railway trips in Great Britain from 1950 to 2005.
The chart is showing number of passenger rail travel in Great Britain between year 1950 and 2005. In year 1950, the number is at high point, around 1000 million traveler. After that, number keeps decreasing over next 3 decades until it reaches a low point in 1980 at around 600 million only. This decrease trend continue for few more year until middle of 1990s. However, starting from around 1995, the passenger railway travel number starts increasing again. It keep going up steadily over next decade. By 2005, it reaches almost same level as in 1950, which is approximately 1000 million traveler again. In summary, railway travel popularity in Great Britain experienced a decline trend for many decades since 1950, but it recovered back to original high level by 2005 due to steady growth in last decade. The reason for this change in trend could be many, such as improved railway service, increased population, or changed travel preferences.
The role of distance learning programs is becoming increasingly necessary and promoted these days, while others believe that it cannot replace the great value of face-to-face teaching. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In these day, distance learning programs are being more necessary and promoted while other people think this could not replace face to face teaching individual value. There is both benefits and drawbacks of distance studying and traditional education methods. I will discuss about both views in this essay. On the one hand, distance learning programs has many advantage. Firstly, it is very convenient for people who live far away from school or university. They don't need to travel long distance every day to attend classes. secondly, it is more flexible than traditional education methods. Students can study at their own pace and choose their own schedule. Thirdly, it is usually cheaper than traditional education because students don't need to pay for transportation and accommodation. On the other hand, traditional education methods also has many benefits. Firstly, students can have face to face interaction with teachers and other students. This is very important for developing social skills and building relationships. Secondly, teachers can provide immediate feedback and guidance to students. This is very helpful for students who need extra help or clarification. Thirdly, traditional education methods can provide a more structured and disciplined learning environment. This is important for students who need more motivation and support to stay on track. In conclusion, I believe that distance learning programs and traditional education methods both has their own advantages and disadvantages. It is important to choose the method that best suits your needs and learning style. For some people, distance learning programs may be more convenient and flexible, while for others, traditional education methods may be more effective and engaging. Ultimately, the most important thing is to find a method that works for you and helps you achieve your educational goals.
The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement
In my opinion i largely agree with statement that science main goal should be making people lives better. There are several reason i think like this. First of all, science have always been about helping people. For example, many of the greatest scientist in history, like Newton or Einstein, their worked was motivated by a desire for understanding world better and using this knowledge for benefiting humanity. They wanted to find ways to make lives of people more easier and comfortable. This show that from beginning, science was driven by aim of improving human life. Secondly, when we look at most important scientific achievement of recent times, they all have had direct impact on people lives. For instance, advances in medical science have led to cures for many diseases and helped people live for longer. Similarily, research in fields like agriculture and food science result in more efficient way of producing food, which is helping to feed growing world population. These example demonstrate how science continue to play vital role in enhancing quality of human life. Of course, there are some people who argue that science should be pursed for its own sake, regardless of whether it have practical benefit or not. They say that curiousity and desire for knowledge are enough to justify scientific research. While I agree that these are important motivations for scientist, I still believe that ultimate aim of their work should be to make positive difference in people lives. In conclusion, i strongly agree that main goal of science should be improving lives of people. This have been true throughout history, and it remains the case today, as we can see from many ways in which scientific progress is benefiting humanity.
Information technology enables many people to do their work outside their workplace (e.g. at home, when travelling, etc.). Do the benefits of this mobility outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays peoples are working more and more outside off the offices with helps of technology like laptops and mobile phones. Lot of work can simply be perform at home or when on bus or on long train rides. There is some advantages of this mobility for workers but there is disadvantages too. I believe the good points bigger than the not so good points. One main benefit of people able to works remotely thanks the latest technology is more freedoms and fexlibities. Employees does not need to wasted time commuting on crowded public transports or in traffics jams, they can just work from the comfort of house. This also means they has more times to spend with there families or pursue hobbies in between work. They could go jogging or cooking meals which not possible if stuck in office cubicle all day. So they may felt happier and more relaxed with job. But the downsides cannot be ignored. Firstly when everybodies scattered around doing work separated, companies culture may suffer. Its harder to make friendships and connections with coworkers if cannot chit chat by water cooler or meet up for lunches. The team spirit gets reduce and employees felt less loyal to company. Also its easy to gets distracted at home - kids playing loudly, TV blaring, chores need doing. So workers may not focuses on tasks and tasks take longer to get completes. And bosses cannot watch over their staffs to ensure productivity levels. In contrusions, i think the advantages of IT allowing mobile work trumps the negatives. The increased flexibilities means staffs are happier and more motivated. Yes there may be some detractions to companies culture but i believe this tradeoff worth it. After all a happy staffs mean a productive staff. As long as firm guidelines put in place, like regularly video call meetings, remote work is net positive for companies in future.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: Traveling to new places is one of the best ways to learn about the world and expand your horizons. What are some of the benefits of traveling to new and unfamiliar destinations? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.
Travelling to new and different places are one of best ways for learning about world and making your horizons bigger. There are many advantages of go to places you never been before. Firstly, when you travel somewhere new, you experience different cultures. You see how other people live there lifes, what kinds of food they eat, clothes they wear and language they speaking. This help you understand world better and realize your own culture are just one of many. For example, when I go to visit my friend in Japan, I was suprised to see how polite and respectful everyone is, bowing to each other. It was different than my country but I learn to appreciating it. Second, travel to new places often means you must step out from your comforting zone. You must figure out how to get around in unfamiliar city, communicate with people who maybe don't speak your language, and try new things. This can be scary but also help you grow as person. It build your confident and independence. I remember feeling very nerves when I first arrive in New York City by myself, but by end of trip I feel proud that I manage on my own. Also, exposure to new things and ideas when you travel can make you more creative. Many artist and writeres say they get inspired by the places they visit and people they meet. Seeing new sights, hearing new musics, tasting new foods - it stimulate your mind in refreshing way. Maybe it even give you new ideas for your own work or hobbys back home. Of course, not everyone have money or time for lots of travel. But I believe even small trips to nearby towns or parts of your own city you never explore before can have similar affect. The important thing is to put yourself in new environs with open mind. In conclusion, while it take some effort, I strongly believe travel to new places provide many benefit. It broaden your perspectiv, push you out of comfort zone, and inspire creativity. It one of best ways to truly learn about our big world.
The maps below show the town of Langley in 1910 and 1950. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrates how the town of Langley has change from 1910 to 1950. Overall, the town has undergone significant expansion and development over these four decades. In 1910, Langley was a small settlement centered around a main road. There were a few houses scattered along this road, and a river running to the east of the town. By 1950, the town has grown considerably. Many new houses has been built, especially in the area north of the main road. The road itself has also been expanded into a larger road, possibly to accommodate the increase population. Another notable development is the construction of a bridge over the river, connecting the main part of the town with the area to the east. This suggests the town has expanded beyond its original boundaries. Also, in the northern part of town, a railway line has been built, further indication the growth and development of Langley. In conclusion, the maps clearly shows that Langley has transformed from a small rural settlement in 1910 to a much larger and more developed town by 1950, with improved transportation infrastructure and an expanded residential area to accommodate population growth.
Art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world. However, these days fewer and fewer people appreciate art and turn their focus to science, technology and business. Why do you think that is? What could be done to encourage more people to take interest in the arts?
These day, art is not appreciate by many people. Science, technology, business is taking the focus away. In past, art was big part of society and culture. Now people care more about practical things for survive and make money. One reason is education system focus too much on STEM fields like math, science, engineering. Art class get cut from schools when budget problems happen. So student grow up not learning about art, music, creative subject. They learn art is not important subject, waste of time. Parent also push kid to study thing that can help them find good job, not appreciate beauty and culture. Another cause is how busy modern life have become. People working long hour, deal with stress, have family responsibility. Very little free time to enjoy art like go museum, see play, or make own art for hobby. Life have become about make money to pay bill, no time for "extras". Technology also make easy entertainment that not need much think, like social media and videos on internet. To make more people like arts again, need start young. Keep art and music class in all school, show student art is valuable. Take them to museum, show play, let them try paint and act. Let them develop creative mind when brain still grow. For adult, government and company should give more holiday time for enjoy arts. Maybe special discount for ticket to show. Have event in park with music and dance everyone can join. Art is what make us human, not just survive but really live. Without it, society lose important part of self. We must all work to keep art alive for future generations and not forget in busy modern world.
Write a letter to the manager of your insurance company. In your letter describe the item you lost explain how you lost it tell the insurance company what you would like them to do
Dear Manager of Insurance Company, I am writing to you about the item what I lost that it is my phone. It is iPhone 12 Pro Max Gold 256GB. It is very expensive phone, cost me a lot of money to buying it. The phone is new because I buyed it 2 months ago only from official Apple store. I lost the phone yesterday evening when I am going back to home from work. I go with the bus as usualy. The bus is very full and crowded in the evening time. I am standing in the bus because there is no place for siting. I have to standing for long time until my station for get off the bus. When I am ready to get off the bus I can not find my phone in my poket. I am searching every where in the bus but I can not find it. I think maybe someone stole the phone from my poket or maybe it falled down when the bus is shaking. I want to ask you please to help me with this problem. I have insurance for this phone from your company. I bought the insurance when I buy the phone. I payed a lot of money for the insurance so I want you to help me now please. I want to get new phone from the insurance or the money for buy new phone. I have all the documents and the recite of buying the phone and the insurance. I can send it to you if you need it. Thank you for your helping. I am waiting for your answer as soon as possible. Your sincerly, [NAME]
Write about the following topic: My love story You should write at least 250 words.
I am falling in love the first time when I am 15 year old. He is handsom and tall boy name Sam. We meet in school because we are in same classes for Science and Mathematics. At first I don't know that I like him but soon I am realize my feelings for him are strong. Every day I am waiting to see Sam in hallway between classes. My heart beat fast when I see him and I am becoming nervous to talking. But he always say hi to me with big smile that make me melt inside. After few week, Sam ask me on date to go see movie. I am so excitement! We have wonderful time and hold hand during movie. From that day, Sam and I are couple. We spend all our free time together, studying at library, eating lunch, going for walk in park. He make me laugh and feel special. I am thinking that I want to be with him forever. But then Sam's family move to another city and he have to go with them. We promise to stay in touch but it is hard because we are so far away. We talk on phone and send letter but eventually we lose contact. I am heartbreak for long time and think I will never fall in love again. Now I am older and I know that first love is special but there will be other love in life. I am grateful for memories with Sam and how he teach me about love. Even though it end, my love story with Sam will always have special place in my heart. It is part of what make me who I am today and I will never forget.
Some people regard eating meat as completely wrong. To what extent do you agree?
Eating meat is a very debate topic in peoples of time now. Many persons feel that its completly wrong to eating meat of any animal. While other think that eating meats are acceptable and necesary. In my opinions, I moderately agree with eating meats for couple of reasons which I will explain. Firstly, meat is major source of protein and nutrition for people body. It contain very importent vitamins and minerals that is necessarie for good health and devlopment. Especialy for growing childrens and pregnant women, meat is crutial part of healty diet. Without eating meats regulary, people can become malnutrition and suffer for deficiencies. Secondly, meat has been a part of humin diet for tousands of years. Our ancestors hunt animals for survivel and it is natural instict to consuming meat. Many cultural traditions revolve arround eating meat, such as holiday meal with families. Completely abandon meat eating can lead loss of important aspect our heritage. However, I also believe that we should be aware about animal welfare and ethic of eating meat. Factory farming can be very cruel to animals and cause them much suffer before slaughter. We must ensure that animals are reared in human conditions and killed as painlessly as posible. Additionally, excessive consumption of meat, especialy red meat, has been link to increase risk of certian health problems like heart desease. In conclusion, while I support the idea of eating meat as part of balance diet, I also think we need be concious about source of our meat and amount we consum. Moderation is key - we should not overindulg in meat but also not completelly eliminate it. By taking a sensible approch, we can enjoy benefit of meat while also respect animals and our health.
Many people are always ready to eat prepared food because people are very lazy. But this will definitely lead to bad results.
In now days, many of peoples are prefers to eat prepered foods from resturants or hotels. They thinks that it is more convenyent and easy to just buying the food from outside instead of cooking at home. However, I strongly beleive that this habbit can be lead to many negative consekwenses in the long run. Firstly, when we eat food from outside, we do not know about the ingredints and cooking methods used in prepering the dish. The resturants may be using low quality ingredints or unhealthy cooking methods like deep frying or adding too much oil and spices. This can be affect our health badly and cause problems like obesity, high blood pressure and heart diseases. Secondly, eating outside food regularly can be also affects our budget. Resturant food is always more expensive than home cooked meals. If we eat outside every day, it can be add up to a significant amount of money over time. This money could be saved or used for other important things like education or healthcare. In the concusion, while eating prepered food may seem like an easy option, it is important to consider the long term effects on our health and finances. It is always better to cook at home using fresh and healthy ingredints. This way, we can control what goes into our food and also save money in the long run.
Schools should use films, computers and games instead of books. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the present days, some peaple believe schools suppose to change books to films, compyuters and varius games for educate the childrens. I partly disagree with this opinion, i will explain reason for my opinion in following paragraphs. Firstly, books are most tradition method for education for many centures. They help student to improve them imaginition and creativity, which are importent for growth. Also, textbooks have simple structure and provide the information in systematic and logical way. They written by professionals with many knowledges in the field. So, books are very useful and cannot be replaced fully by games or computers. Secondly, use films and games can make learning more enjoyable and interactiv for students. Visuall materials can demonstrat complex concepts more clearly. Also video games can improve problem solveing and critical thinkings skills. Computers also provide access to wide range of resourses and informations. So, this technology should definitly be used in additional to books, but we should not forget about books completly. In conclusion, i believe that it important to use combinetion of books and modern technology like computors, games and films in schools. Books will always remain useful for systematic learning, but technology should be added to make education more effectiv and engaging for the new generatien of students.
Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, earn lots money by do sport professionally is a hot topic discussed of many peoples. Some of them thinks this justified, while others no agree because see unfairly. I will talk of both opinions in this essay and try give my thought. One the one hand, peoples who thinks justified that sportists earn more gives reasons. First, their say that sportsmen having rare athletic ability and hard work to be best. This make logical that should paid high. Second, they thinks pro sportists career very short, so need make money fast in short time, not like doctor or lawyer can work long time. Also, pro sport make big economy in tickets sellings and merchandise. In other hands, peoples who thinks unfair argue sports celebrity salaries too high comparing to importance works like doctors and teachers. They saving lifes and educating young, which have more value to society than kicking ball. They see not fair that teachers earn low while footbalists drive fast cars just because running on field. In my opinion, I agree sports salaries too high, but free market decide prices, not ethics. I see professional sportists get paid how much peoples willing to paying for watch them. But I wishes goverments would make better balance by taxing rich sportists high, and using money to increase salaries of important jobs. This way, sportists still earning what market allow, but by taxes, doctors and teachers can living better life, and society more fair.
People who live in large cities face a range of problems in their daily life. What are the main problems people in cities face, and how can these problems be tackled? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.
Life in big sity is challenging with many problems peoples facing every day. I think there are two mane issues - first one is too many people population density, and second is the fast paced way of live. These problem influence quality of life in different way. When too many people live in one place, it is hard to move around freely with out traffic. Traffic make it take long to go any where, waste time and give stress even drive short distance in the sity. Also public transport is over crowded & uncomfertable. Many people cannot avoid public transport cause they have no car. But if all have car it would be even worse traffick! So overcrowding of people make transport a huge problem in city's. Secondly, city life style is always rush and hurry. People are running here and there, no patience to wait and everyone stressed. This is seen in how peoples interact each other. Like on road there is more aggresion and honking. No time to talk with neighbour. At work place the pressure is high even if salary high. Lifestyle is hectic to earn money for high living cost in city but then no time to enjoy. So, i belief traffic and fast pace are the biggest problem. To tackle requiers effort from individual persons but also goverment. For example goverment must invest to improve the public transport, to reduce number of private vehicles and ease traffic issues. Company's should have flex hours so rush traffic is reduce. Indivijuals must try to bring balance in life. Take brakes, make time for family & freinds, find peace in hobbys or leisure persuits. Connect with peoples around and slow down, life is not a race! In conclushion, while big city's ofer many opportunites they also have lots of problms. The issues created by dense populations and hectic lifestyls can be adressed thru combination of better infrastrukture, more flexibilty and personal efforts to bring life balanse. Still, problems will remain and big sity may not suit all.
Some people believe that in a city, the best way to travel is by car, while other people argue that bicycles are a better way of travelling in a city. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In today's world, there are many ways to travel in city, but the two most common are by car and bicycle. Some people think that using car is the best way to get around a city, while others argue that riding a bicycle is better. In this essay, I will discuss both views and give my opinion. On the one hand, those who favor cars argue that they are more convenient and faster than bicycles. Cars can carry more people and luggage, and they can travel long distances without getting tired. They also provide protection from bad weather such as rain or snow. Additionally, cars are seen as a status symbol, and many people aspire to own a car as a sign of success and prestige. On the other hand, those who prefer bicycles point out that they are more environmentally friendly and healthy than cars. Bicycles do not produce any pollution or greenhouse gases, and they do not contribute to traffic congestion in cities. Riding a bicycle is also a good form of exercise that can improve physical fitness and reduce the risk of obesity and other health problems. Moreover, bicycles are cheaper to own and maintain than cars, and they do not require expensive fuel or parking fees. In my opinion, I believe that bicycles are a better way to travel in a city than cars. While cars have some advantages in terms of speed and convenience, I think that the benefits of bicycles outweigh those of cars. As someone who lives in a city, I have seen firsthand how traffic congestion and air pollution can negatively impact the quality of life. Riding a bicycle not only helps to reduce these problems, but it also allows me to save money and stay healthy at the same time. Of course, I recognize that not everyone is able to ride a bicycle due to physical limitations or other reasons, but for those who can, I strongly believe that it is the best way to get around a city. In conclusion, while both cars and bicycles have their advantages and disadvantages when it comes to travelling in a city, I believe that bicycles are the better choice overall. They are more environmentally friendly, healthy, and cost-effective than cars, and they can help to reduce traffic congestion and improve the quality of life in cities. Therefore, I would encourage more people to consider riding a bicycle instead of driving a car whenever possible.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: What is marriage? Why do people get married? Discuss both the potential benefits and drawbacks of marriage. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.
Marriage is the traditional union between man and woman who decide to make commitment to live as husband and wife. There are many reasons people choose to get married in modern society. One of main benefit of marriage is to build stable family and provide secure environment for raising children. When couple get married, they vow to support each other and any kids they may have together. Marriage offer legal and financial protections for spouses and their family. For example, married couples are often eligible for tax breaks and can share health insurance coverage through their employer. Marriage promotes idea of partnership where husband and wife share responsibilities and help one another through life's ups or downs. However, some people argue there are also downsides to getting married. Marriage require big commitment and not everyone want to make that promise. Divorce rates are high in many countries, which suggests marriage is not always happy ending people hope for. When marriage end in divorce it can be very painful and cause lot of stress, especially if there are children involved. Marriage also mean giving up some independence and freedom. Spouses must consult each other and make compromises when it come to major life decisions. In conclusion, while marriage have many potential advantages like stability, legal benefits, and partnership - it is not right choice for everyone. Some people prefer to remain single or cohabitate without getting officially married. The important thing is for individuals to carefully consider what they want in life and relationship, and make decision that best for them. There is no one-size-fits-all answer when it comes to question of whether to get married.
In today's world, people are changing their appearance by surgery, jewelry and makeup. What are the reasons behind this? Is this a positive or negative development?
In modern world, many people are try to changing their appearance by do some type of thing like surgery, wearing jewelry and putting makeup. There are many reason why they doing this kind of thing. I will try to explaining some of those reason in this essay and also tell if this is positive or negative thing. One reason people change appearance is because they want look more beautiful or handsome. They think that if they look more good, they will be more successful in life, like in job or in relationship. For example, many actor and actress do surgery to change their face and body because they want to look perfect on camera. Also, many people wear jewelry like necklace, earring, and ring to make themself look more attractive and stylish. Another reason is that people want to fit in with society and follow fashion trend. Many people, especially young generation, want to look like their favorite celebrity or model. They see them wearing certain kind of makeup or clothing style and they want to copy that style to be like them. This is especially true for teenager who are still try to find their identity and want to belong to certain group. In my opinion, changing appearance can be both positive and negative thing. It can be positive if it make people feel more confident and happy about themself. It can boost their self-esteem and make them feel more successful in life. However, it can also be negative if people become too obsessed with their look and spend too much money and time on it. They might forget what truly important in life, like their personality, character, and relationships with other people. In conclusion, there are several reason why people change their appearance nowdays, such as wanting to look more attractive or following fashion trend. While it can have some positive effect, it can also be negative if people become too focused on their appearance. In the end, what matter most is not how we look on the outside, but who we are on the inside.
With the growing population of cities, more and more people live in homes that have little or no outdoor area. Is this a positive or negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
Nowdays, more peoples living in cities witout outdoor spaces at they homes. i think this is negative development for some reasons which i will explain. Firstly, people need fresh air and sunlight to staying healthy. If peoples living in homes without outdoor spaces, they cannot get vitamin d or exercice outside. This can lead for health problems like obesety, depresion, and other issues. For example, my friend lives in apartment building in big city, and he always complaning about feeling tired and sad because he dont have any place to go outside and relax. Secondly, people need to connect with nature for they mental and emotionel well-being. Studies show that spending time in green spaces can reduce stress, improve mood, and increase creativty. If people dont have acces to outdoor areas at they homes, they may feel disconneted from nature world and experience negative emotions. like loneliness or anxety. In conclusion, I believe that the trend of peoples living in homes without outdoor spaces is negative development. It can have negative effect on both they physical and mental health, as well as they overol quality of life. City planers and developers should priortize creating homes with access for outdoor areas, such as balconys, terraces, or communal gardens, to ensure that residents have oppertunities to connect with nature and enjoy fresh air and sunlight.
You are taking a course at a local college. The deadline for your project was last week but you haven't finished it. Write a letter to your lecturer. In your letter introduce yourself explain why you haven't handed in the project yet request more time to do it
Dear Mr John, My name is Li Wei and I am student in your Physic 101 class this semester. I writing to you about my final project that was due the last week. I know deadline has past but I have not been able to complet the project on time. The reason for my delay is I was sick with a bad flu for one week. It was very difficult time and I have high fever and could not concentrate to do my studies. I tried work on the project but my sickness made it impossible to focus and make progress. I am feeling better now but I am behind in my work. I wanted to request from you a extension for my project deadline. I know it is important to submit work on time but I hoping you can make exception because of my unexpected illness. If you can give me 3 more days I am confident that I can finish my project to a high standard. I will work very much hard to get it done. Please let me know if a deadline extension is possible. I appreciate your teaching and I apologise for any inconveniance. I am commited student and I looking forward to submiting my final project. Thank you for the consideration. Sincerely, Li Wei
You recently took a trip with a taxi company. The driver behaved in an unacceptable way and you had a lot of problems. You complained to the company but no-one has replied to your complaint. Write a letter to the taxi company. In your letter say why you are writing and how you feel explain what happened tell them what you would like them to do
Dear Sir or Madam, I am writing to you because of my very bad experience with a trip from your taxi company recently and I feel very unhappy and disappointed about this situation. I want to explain what happened and how you can improve your service. Last week, on 15th March, I took a taxi from the airport to my hotel in the city center. The driver was very rude and he did not help me with my luggages. He was driving very fast and dangerously, and I was very scared during the whole trip. I asked him to slow down but he did not listen to me. He was also smoking in the car, which made me feel very uncomfortable. When we arrived at the hotel, the driver demand me to pay more than the price that was shown on the meter. I refused to pay the extra money, and he became very angery and shouted at me. I was very shocked and upsetted by his behavior. I complained to your company the next day, but I have not received any response from you. This is very disappointing and I feel that you do not care about your customers. I would like you to take this matter seriously and investigate what happen. I also want you to give me a refund for the trip and an apology for the driver's unacceptable behavior. You should also train your drivers better and make sure that they provide good service to your customers. I look forward to hearing from you soon about this matter. Yours faithfully, [your name]
Details of politicians' private lives should not be published in newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
I am agree that details of politicians' private lifes should not be publish in newspapers. There are many reasons for my opinion, which i will explain in this essay. Firstly, politicians are also humans and they have a right to privacy like any other person. If newspapers will publish details of their private lifes, it can be very embarrasing and uncomfortable for them. It can also affect their family members and friends, who are not public figures. For example, if a politician's child is having some health issues or personal problems, it should not be splashed all over the newspapers just because their parent is a politician. Secondly, the focus of newspapers should be on politicians' work and policies, not on their personal lifes. What matters is how they are serving the public and what decisions they are making that affect people's lives. Their private lifes have no bearing on their ability to do their job. For instance, if a politician is doing a good job and working hard for the people, it should not matter what he or she does in their free time or who they are dating. However, there can be some exceptions to this rule. If a politician's personal life is affecting their work or if they are involved in some illegal or unethical activities, then it may be necessary for newspapers to report on it. But even in such cases, the reporting should be done responsibly and with respect for privacy. In conclusion, I strongly believe that politicians' private lifes should be off-limits for newspapers in most cases. The media should focus on their work and policies, and respect their right to privacy like any other citizen.