IELTS Writing Sample Essays and Model Answers

The education you receive from your family is more important than the education you receive from school. To what extent do you agree with this statement and why?

In my onion, the education that a person gets from family has more significance then what we learned in school. I agree with this statement to a big extent for some reasons that I will explain. Firstly, family education is the fundation for all of the person's values, beliefs and moral. Our parents and other relatives teach us from a young age what is right and what is wrong. They show to us how to behave properly and treats others with kindness and respectful. This moral education is more important then the academic knowledges we get at school, because it shapes our character and make us into good human being. Without a strong fundation of values from family, even a person who is very educated in school may not be a good person. Secondly, the lessons and skills that we learns from family stay with us for our whole lives. Family members teaches us important life skills like how to cook, clean, manage money, and take care of our health. They also give us advices and support us emotionally through difficult times. These practical skills and emosional support are things that schools do not provide, but we continu to apply them and relay on them long after finishing our education. In conclution, while school education is certenly valuable for gaining knowledge and skills, I belief that the education we receive from family has a bigger and more lasting impact on our lives. It shapes our values, teaches important life skills, and gives us emosional support that we need at every stage of life. These thing makes family education truly irreplaceable and more significant then what we learn in school.

New technologies and ways of buying and selling are transforming the lives of consumers. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

In modern times, new technologies have big impact on consumers life. I agree with the opinion to a large extent. This essay will discuss how technologies changing consumers in terms of buying products and daily life. First of all, with internet and online shopping, it is much easier for consumers to buy products they need. In the past, if someone want to buy something, they need to go to physical store which may be far away. But now, with just few clicks on computer or phone, people can buy anything they want and get it delivered to their home. This save a lot of time and effort for consumers. Moreover, new technologies also changing the way people live their daily life. For example, with smartphone and apps, people can do many things like order food, book taxi, pay bills and even control home appliances. This make life much more convenient and efficient for consumers. They don't need to waste time on small tasks and can focus on more important things. In conclusion, I strongly agree that new technologies transforming consumers life in significant ways. It make buying products and daily tasks much easier and faster. This is a positive development as it improve quality of life for many people.

Some people believe that a person's culture is defined by their country of origin, while others believe that has only a minor influence. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

Some peoples think a person's culture is defined by they country of origin. However, other people think it has only a minor affect. This essay will discussed both view and give my opinion. On the one hand, many people believe that culture of a person is mostly determinate by country where they were born and grow up. They argue that the traditions, customs, and beliefs of a country is deeply ingrained in the people who live there, and this shapes they identity and worldview. For example, someone who grow up in India will likely be influenced by the Hindu religion and the importance of family and community. Similarly, someone from Japan will be shape by the values of hard work, respect for elders, and harmony. These cultural influence are passed down from generation to generation and become an integral part of who we are. On the other hands, others believe that a person culture is not solely defined by they country of origin. They points out that in today globalized world, people are expose to a wide range of cultural influence from around the world. With the internet and social media, it is easier than ever to learn about and adopt elements of other cultures. Moreover, many people move to different country for work or study, and may pick up new cultural practices and beliefs along the way. For instance, an Chinese student who studies in the United States may become more individualistic and independent, while also maintaining some aspects of they Chinese heritage. In my opinion, I believe that both factors - country of origin and exposure to other cultures - play a role in shaping a person culture. While our upbringing and the culture we are surrounded by in our formative years certainly have a strong influence, I think it is important to recognize that culture is not static and can evolve over time. As we encounter new ideas and ways of life, we may incorporate elements of other cultures into our own identity. Ultimately, culture is complex and multi-faceted, and cannot be reduced to a single factor such as country of origin. In conclusion, while country of origin plays a significant role in shaping a person culture, it is not the only factor. In our increasingly interconnected world, exposure to diverse cultures can also have an impact on our beliefs, values, and practices.

You recently had a car accident. You were not injured, but your car was damaged. Write a letter to your insurance company. In your letter: Introduce yourself and describe the accident. Detail the damage to your car. Explain why you need your car repaired quickly. Write at least 150 words. You do not need to write any addresses. Begin your letter with: Dear Sir or Madam

Dear Sir or Madam, I am writing to inform you about an accident which i recently had with my car. My name is Mikhail Petrov and I had been driving home from work on Tuesday evening when another vehicle suddenly hit my car from behind at a traffic light. Fortunately, I was not injured in the collision but my car sustained significant damage. The rear bumper was completely crumpled and detached. Additionally, the trunk lid was badly dented and no longer closes properly. Due to the force of the impact, I believe there may also potentially be some damage to the frame or suspension components that is not immediately visible. It is imperative that my car can be repaired as soon as possible. As a salesman, I rely on my vehicle to travel to client meetings and make deliveries. Without a functional car, it will be very challenging for me to perform my job duties and could negatively impact my income. I would be deeply appreciative if you could expedite the claims process and authorize the necessary repairs to be made with minimal delay. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to hearing back from you shortly regarding next steps in getting my car repaired and back on the road. Sincerely, Mikhail Petrov

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Some people think that it is better to choose a job with high salary, while others think that it is better to choose a job that you love. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Write at least 250 words.

These days, many people have different views on what is important when select a job. Some people believe that it is better to choose the job which has high salary. However, others think that it is more important to do a job that you love doing. In my oppinion, I think both salary and enjoyment are important factors when choosing a job. On the one hand, many people choose a job base on the salary it offers. They believe that money is the most inportant thing in life, and a high salary job can provide them with financial security and ability to afford luxury items. For example, if someone choose to be a doctor or lawyer, they can earn a lot of money and live a comfortable life. They can buy big house, fancy car, and go on expensive vacations. Money can also provide a sense of achievement and status in society. When someone has a high paying job, they may feel proud and successful. However, on the other hand, some people argue that it is better to choose a job that you are passionate about. They believe that if you love what you do, you will be more motivated and satisfied with your work. For instant, if someone has a passion for teaching, they may choose to be a teacher even though the salary is not very high. They will find joy and fulfillment in helping students learn and grow. They may also feel that their work is meaningful and contributes to society in a positive way. Furthermore, when you enjoy your job, you may be less likely to experience stress and burnout. In conclusion, I believe that both salary and personal interest are important considerations when choosing a job. While a high salary can provide financial security and status, it is also important to find a job that you are passionate about. Ultimately, the best job is one that balances both factors and allows you to live a fulfilling and satisfying life.

Write about the following topic: My hometown You should write at least 250 words.

I coming from a small town that is not well nown by most people. Many considers it to be a place where nothing much happenes a quite boring town. Howover, I disgree strongly with this perspective on my hometown. There exist reasons why someone might find my town to be boring. It lack excitement attractions, which some poeple associate with a good time. There are not any popular torist destinations in my hometown. There is only a few shops and most of them close around 6 pm on weekdays and earlier on weekends. For these reasons, my hometown is see as boring and unintersting for many peoples. I, on the another hand, find many things to appreciate about my hometown. I love how quiet and peaceful it is here. You can walking down the street at any times without a lot of noise or traffic. I also apreciate how friendly and close-knit the community feels. Most people know each othre and are willing to help out neibors. Finally, I enjoys the natural beauty of the surrounding area. My hometown is surounded by forests and mountains, which makes it a beautiful place to hike and enjoy the outdors. In conclusion, although my hometown may seems like a boring place for many, I personally find it to be a peaceful and beautiful place to lives. I appreciate the close-knit community and the natural beauty that surrounds us. So while it may no be exciting for some, it is the prefect place for me to call home.

In the future, people may no longer be able to pay for things in shops using cash. All payments may have to be made by card or using phones. Do you think this will happen one day? Why do you think some people might not be happy to give up using cash?

In futur, i beleive that most of the payment methods will change and cash money will no exist any longer. Instead of using cash money, people will able to use their cards or mobile phones for making payments. This change is already started and in developed countries many people are using digital methods for making payments in the shopes. I think it is very possible that one day cash money will completely disappear. The main reason for this is that digital payments are much more convenient and secure then cash payments. With digital payments, you do not need to carry cash with you all the time and worry about losing it. Also, digital payments are much faster and easier to track. Many businesses are also prefering digital payments because it is more efficient for them. However, some people may not be happy to give up using cash compleetly. One reason for this is that some people may not trust digital payment systems and worry about their privacy and security. They may feel that their financial information could be hacked or stolen if they use digital payments. Another reason is that some people may not have access to digital payment methods, especially in developing countries where not everyone has a bank account or a mobile phone. These people may rely on cash for their daily transactions and may find it difficult to adapt to a cashless society. In conclusion, while it is likely that cash money will eventually disappear in the future, there may be some challenges and resistance from some people. It is important for governments and businesses to address these concerns and ensure that everyone has access to secure and convenient digital payment methods.

Songs "Xin chao Viet Nam" and origin from France

There have two songs is very popular in Vietnam, it called "Xin chao Viet Nam". One song written by Vietnamese people and one song written by France people. Even though it have same name but it very different. The Vietnamse song is talk about the country and people of Vietnam. It describe the beauty of nature, mountain and rivers of Vietnam. The song also talk about Vietnamese peoples kindness and hospitalty. It mention about the struggle of Vietnames people to get independence. The song have a gentle melody and very easy to listen and remember. In other hand, the France song have completely different. It talk about a France soldier who falled in love with Vietnamese women during the war. The France soldier impressed by Vietnamese culture and people. He decided stay in Vietnam after the war to married with his Vietnamese girlfriend. The song have a romantic melody and very touchy. In conclusion, despite share same name, that two songs is totally different in the content and meaning. One song praise the beauty of Vietnam country and people, while other song is a love story between France soldier and Vietnamse women. Both song have became popular and loved by many peoples in Vietnam.

The bar chart shows the percentage of males and females aged 18-20 in a city who participated in various activities in one month in 2015.

The chart is showing data about people 18-20 years old living in city and what percentages do in one month. The data is from 2015 and shows differences of male and females. Highest percentage is going to the cinema. for male it is over 90% go to cinema and female little less maybe 80 or 85%. Both very high though. Next is going to pubs, male and female similar around 75%. Third is night club, more male than female go night club in the data. Lowest is museum and art galery. Male museum is lowest on chart maybe 10%. Female double that so 20%. Female more likely than men going to museums it look like from the results in 2015. In conclusion, the chart show how young adult in city spend there free time in a month. Most popular is cinema then pubs and club. Museum is least popular in data especially for the mens. It would be interesting to see what the percentages is now in 2023 and if change happen.

Many people believe that zoos have no purpose in today's world and should be closed. What problems do zoos bring? What are the alternatives to zoos if they are closed?

In dis modern world, lot of peoplse think zoo is not important and must close. I agree with dis idea because zoo bring many problem for animal and human. Dere are also good alternate for zoo if gov decide to close dem. First of all, zoos is bad place for wild aminal. Dey are lock in small area and cannot run and hunt like natural habitat. Dis cause great suffer and sadness to dem. Also sometime zoo dont give proper food or care to animal, so dey become sick and die early. Lot of zoo keep animal in dirty conditon widout clean water. Dis kind situation would never happen in wild. Secondly, zoo also create trouble to humans. Many times animal excape from cage and attack visitor, causing injury and dead. In addision, zoo spread dieses from sick aminal to human, specially childrens who has weak imune system. Many peple also dont like to see wild aminal living in artifishal enviromint, so dey dont want to visit zoo and waist money. I think zoos is not good use of tax payers money for dis reson. However, if zoos is close, dere is some options to replace dem. One good alternate is wildlife sanctuary where aminals can live in mor natural surround and plenty spase. Peple can still see dem but from safe distant. Govt can also invest money in conserbation program to protect aminal in wild insted of putting dem in zoo. Dis will help to maintain eco system and biodiversity on earth. In conclusion, I strong belive dat zoos doing more harm dan good in todays world. Dey are cruel to aminals and also danger for humans visiting dem. We have much better alternate like wildlife sanctury and conserbation projekt. It is importent dat we take step to phase out zoos and focus on protecting aminals in der true habitat.

How fake news is taking over social media and putting public health at risk?

In the modern age of social media and internet news, fake informations are becoming increasingly common and they are having negative impacts on public health. This essay will discuss how fake news are spreading on social media platforms and why they are posing a major thread to the health and well-being of individuals and communities. One of the main reasons why fake news are becoming so prevalent on social media is the lack of regulation and fact-checking. Unlike traditional news media, which have strict editorial process and fact-checking procedures, social media platforms allow anyone to post and share informations without any verification or oversight. This means that false and misleading informations can spread rapidly and reach large audiences before they are detected and removed. Additionally, many social media algorithms are designed to prioritize engaging and controversial content, which can further amplify the spread of fake news. The impact of fake news on public health can be significant and far-reaching. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been numerous instances of fake news and misinformation about the virus, vaccines, and treatments circulating on social media. These false informations can lead people to make poor health decisions, such as avoiding vaccination or using ineffective or dangerous treatments. They can also contribute to the spread of conspiracy theories and undermine public trust in science and health authorities. To address this problem, it is important for social media platforms to take stronger action to combat fake news and misinformation. This could include implementing more robust fact-checking systems, partnering with reputable news organizations and health authorities, and taking swift action to remove false and misleading content. Additionally, individuals have a responsibility to be critical consumers of information and to verify the sources and credibility of the news they encounter on social media. In conclusion, the spread of fake news on social media is a growing threat to public health. It is important for social media platforms and individuals to take action to combat this problem and ensure that accurate and reliable information is widely available. By working together to promote media literacy and fact-based reporting, we can help to protect public health and build a more informed and resilient society.

Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Nowdays, many people have discussion about if important information should be shared or keeped secret. This is a complicating issue with valid arguments of both sides. On the one hand, freely sharing of knowledges can have much benefits for society. In science fields, when researchers share they data and findingses openly, it allowing others to verify and build on there work, that accelerating the pace of discovery. In academics, sharing educational materials can help more students to accesss high-quality learning resourceses, regardless of there circumstances. And in business world, transparenting about practises and performanse can building public trust and confidenced. So sharing informations can driving progress and improves lifes for many people. But other hand, there also situation where keeping informations private may be necesary. For examples, companies may need protectings trade secrets to remain competiting in marketplace. Goverment agencies may must to safeguard sensitive informations related to national secureties. And individuals have rights to privacy over there personal information. In these case, the potensial harm of shared information outweight the benefits. In my opinion, the best approch is balance between open and privacy. Default to transparensed and shared, but allow for exceptions when there legitimate need for confidensed. This way, we can unlock power of shared knowledges while still protecting important interests. But exactly where to draw the line will depend on specific context. In conclusions, there valid reasons to shared information freely and also sometime to restrict access. I believe in a nuancing view - share by defaults but with carefull exception when needed. As technologies advances and our world become more interconnected, navigating this balance will be a ongoing challenge for individuals, organizasions, and society as whole.

In the past, most people used to travel to their place of work. With increased use of computers, the internet and smart phones, more and more people are starting to work from home. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development?

In this essay i will discuss about the advantages and disAdvantages of working from home. this is a very important topic in todays world as many people are now able to work from they're homes because of the internet and smartphones. One of the main advantage of working from home is that it saves a lot of time. When people work from home, they dont have to spend time travelling to their office which can take a long time especially if they live far away. This extra time can be used to do other important things like spending time with family or doing excercise. Another advantage is that working from home is more flexible. People can choose when they want to work and take breaks when they need to. This is especially helpful for people who have young children or other responsibilities at home. However, their are also some disadvantages of working from home. One disadvantage is that it can be hard to separate work and personal life when you are working from home. It can be tempting to work all the time when your office is in youre house. This can lead to burnout and stress. Another disadvantage is that working from home can be isolating. When you work in a office, you have the opportunity to interact with other people and build relationships. When you work from home, you might not have as many opportunities for social interaction which can be difficult for some persons. In conclusion, working from home has both advantages and disadvantages. While it can save time and be more flexible, it can also lead to burnout and isolation. Companies and employees need to find a balance that works for them. It is important for companies to support there employees and provide resources to help them manage the challenges of working from home. Overall, the trend towards working from home is likely to continue as technology improves and more people value flexibility in they're work arrangements.

Some people argue that the government should give every unemployed person a mobile phone and should make sure they have access to the Internet. They believe this is the best way of using public money to reduce the problem of unemployment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In this essay, I am going to discuss about the opinion that government should provide mobile phones and internet access for unemployed peoples to help them find job. I partially agree with this idea because it has both advantages and disadvantages. On the one hand, provideing mobile phone and internet can be helpful for job seekers. In today world, most of the job postings are online and many companies communicate thrugh email or messaging apps. Without access to these technology, it can be very difficult to find and apply for jobs. Additionally, having a phone number is often required for job applications and interviews. By give unemployed person these tools, government can level the playing field and give them a better chance at finding employment. On the other hand, simply providing phones and internet may not be enough to solve the unemployment. There are many other factors that contribute to joblessness, such as lack of skills, education, or experience. Just because someone have a phone and internet does not mean they will automatically be able to find work. In addition, there is a risk that some people may abuse this program and use the free phone and internet for personal reasons instead of job search. This could be a waste of taxpayer money. In conclusion, I believe that while give unemployed people access to mobile phones and the internet can be helpful, it is not a complete solution to the problem of unemployment. Government should also invest in job training, education, and other programs to address the root causes of joblessness. Only by taking a comprehensive approach we can truly reduceing unemployment in the long term.

News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions?

In today world, news editor have big responsibiltiy to decide which news will be broadcast on TV or print in a newspaper. There are many influence that can affect this decision making process, including public interest, politcal pressure, and also financial considaration. Firstly, public intrest is most important factor for deciding news content. News editors must think carefuly about what kind of information peoples want to know and what stories will be most relevant to their lifes. For example, if there is major natural disaster or political scandal, public will expect to see this news on TV and in newspapers. News editors have to be aware of current events and understand what is important to audience. Another factor is politcal pressure. In some country, government may try to control news media and dictate what kind of stories are allow to be published. News editors may face pressure to avoid certain topics or present news in a way that favors the ruling party. This can be challenge for maintain journalistic integrity and providing balance coverage of events. Finally, financial considarations can also play role in news editors decisions. Running a news organization is expensive, and editors may need to prioritize stories that will attract more viewers or readers in order to generate advertise revenue. This can sometimes lead to sensationalism or focus on entertainment news rather than serious journalism. In conclusion, news editors have complex job that involves balance many different factors when decide what to broadcast or print. While public intrest should be the top priority, political pressure and financial realities can also have significant influence on news content. It is important for news editors to strive for objectvity and integrety in their decision making process.

Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down. Others, however, believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

Some peoples of today think animals exhibiting in zoos is cruel and inhumane and that zoos should close down. However in contrarily, many others peoples argue that zoos also play important role in protecting wild animals species from dangerous and extinction. Both sides has valid points worth examination. One reason of view is that keep wild animal in zoo is cruel treatment to them. The animals in zoos are lock in small enclozure and cages. They cannot roam free as nature intend and must rely on humans for food. Zoos is not natural habitat for them. Wild animal are mean to have large area to roam. For example lion and tigar need big space to run and cheetah is fastest land mammel. Big cat cannot run fast in zoo cage. Zoos cannot simply provide enoguh space like in wild. This lead to animal feel depress, stress, and act out not like in wild. On differing hand, zoos serve also for protect endangered animal. Many animels face extinction due to loss of habitat, climate change, people hunting. Having animal in zoo can help save species for future. Endangered amimals like panda, snow leopard, elephent reproduce in zoo to boost population. Zoo also raise awearness by teaching visitors about animal and importance of conservation. People learn at zoo how amazing animals is and why we must protect for future generation. Another example is zoos helps injured wild animels recover and return to wild later. Many seabirds cleaned by zoos after oil spil disasters for example. So in some situachions, zoos helps animals cannot denied. In conlusion, I belief zoos has both positives and negative. We must try minimize negatve aspect of zoo and focus on protect and conservate. Of course in ideal world, animal should live free in nature. But since human threat wildlife, sadly zoos necesary to ensure some species not disappear completly. In my opinion, if zoos truly puts animal welfare first and use resource for conservation and education, then it can be okay choice until animals can live in safe world again without human dangers. Until then, zoos provide some protecshion. But zoos eating animals very bad I against.

How difficult is it to be a nurse in Romania?

The work of nurses in Romania is very dificult and challenging. They have to work long hours, often in shifts and with little rest. The work environment can be stressful and demanding, with a lot of responsibility and pressure to provide high-quality care to patients. One of the biggest chalenge for nurses in Romania is the low pay and poor working conditions. Many hospitals and clinics are understaffed and underfunded, which means that nurses have to work harder and longer to compensate. They often do not have access to the latest medical equipment or supplies, which can make their job more difficult and frustrating. Another challenge for nurses in Romania is the lack of respect and recognition for their profession. Many people do not understand or appreciate the important role that nurses play in the healthcare system. Nurses are often seen as assistants to doctors, rather than as skilled and knowledgeable professionals in their own right. Despite these challenges, many nurses in Romania are dedicated and passionate about their work. They find satisfaction in helping patients and making a difference in their lives. However, the difficult working conditions and low pay can take a toll on their morale and motivation over time. In conclusion, being a nurse in Romania is a very difficult and challenging job. Nurses face many obstacles, including low pay, poor working conditions, and a lack of respect and recognition. However, they remain committed to providing high-quality care to their patients, despite the many challenges they face.

People who cause their own illnesses through unhealthy lifestyles and poor diets should have to pay more for health care. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

In my view, I completely disagre with this statment that people unhealthy should pay more for health care. Because it is not fair for them. First of all, health are is basic right for every people in the world. It does not matter if they are helthy or not, government should provide them the same quality of health care as everyone else. It is not their falt if they have unhealthy life style, maybe they are poor and can not afford healthy food or gym membership. Maybe they work long hours and do not have time for exercise. So it is not right to punish them by making them pay more for health care. Secondly, if we make unhealthy people pay more, it will only make their health worse. They will not be able to aford the care they need and their condition will get worse. This is not good for society as a whole. It is better to help them to improve their helth rather than punish them. In conclusion, I strongly believe that every one should have access to same quality of health care, regardless of their life style. Government should focus on helping people to improve their health, not punishing them for being unhealthy.

Bar Chart: The graph shows three different kinds of emission sources (oil/coal/gas) of greenhouse gas in the UK. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The Bar Chart provides statistics about greenhouse gas emmision in united kingdom from 3 sources like oil, coal, and gas. This chart shows information of 1990 and 2005 in million tons. Acording to bar chart, coal had the highest polution level at around 78 million tonnes back in 1990. However, by 2005 its emission had decreased dramaticaly to 52 million tons, almost half of 1990 coal emission number. In contrast, amount of greenhouse gas from oil remain steady between 1990 and 2005 with very slightly decline from 68 to 67 million tons. The lowest source are gas, it had significantly lower level then the others at around 35 million ton emission in 1990. But gas pollution increased noticeably over 15 years, reaching to 50 million tons by the year 2005. Overall, despite some decrease of coal and oil, all 3 source still produced alot greenhouse gas. Coal remain one emit the most pollution, followed close by oil. While gas have become worst pollutor by 2005 but it level still less compare to coal or oil.

Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In my opinnion i am agree that government should to spend more money for railway than road. There is diffrent reasons which i will explain in this essey. Firstly, railway is much more efficient to carry a lot of people in same time. When you look at trains, one train can transport thousand of peoples in one times. But in car only 4-5 person can travel in same time. So railway is beter for moving large amount of pople quikly and eficiently. Other reason is that train cause less polution than cars. Car release a lot of dirty gas which make enviroment unhelthy. Train also make polution but it is much lower comparing to car because one train replace many cars. So if goverment invest more on railway it help to reduce air polution in cities and keep enviroment clean for poeple and animals living there. In conclusion, I strongli agree that goverments should focus their spending more on railway system instead of road. Railway is more effectiv way to transport large number of people and it also help environment by reducing air polution. If every country improve their railway it will make big positive change for societi.

In many societies in the world, the population is ageing rapidly and this is leading to an unsustainable increase in the cost of public healthcare. A nation's population should pay for their healthcare provision in the future. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In contemporary time, the amount of eldery people in numerus country is increasing very fust. Consequently this lead to costlier health care for goverment to provide. I am agree that citizens shud pay for they're own helth care expenses in the upcoming years. Firstly, as the number of older peoples becomes bigger, the public spending in health will need to grow as a result. Goverments will be faced with major presure on their budgets to pay for the rising costs of hospitals, medicines and treament for more and more aged peoples. If citizens pay for they're own helth care instead of relying to the goverment, this would reduse the burden on the public finanses significantly. Governments would then have more money available to invast in other important areas like education and infrastructure. Secondly, if people are requiered to cover their personal health care costs, they may be more motivated to stay helthy and avoid unecessary medical expences. They would have a stronger incentive to eat helthier, exercise regularly, and take preventive mesures to avoid getting sick in the first place. Over time, this could lead to a helthier population overalll, which would furthur reduce the strain on the health care system. When people are responsibled for paying their own medical bills, they are more likely to be cautious about there health. In conclustion, I strongly belief that individuls should be expected to finance there own health care needs going forward. This would aleviate the growing pressure on goverment budgets and potentially encourage people to adopt helthier lifestyles. While goverments can still provide a safety net for those who cannot afford basic care, the primary onus should be on citisens themselves to plan and save for there future medical requirements as the population continues aging.