IELTS Writing Sample Essays and Model Answers

Write a report on the impact of technology in the modern era.

In this modern era, technology have changed our lives in many way. It has make communication easier and faster, it has improved healthcare and education, and it has even changed the way we work and do business. One of the biggest impact of technology is on communication. With the internet and mobile phones, we can now communicate with anyone, anywhere in the world, at any time. This has make it easier for people to stay in touch with family and friends, and it has also make it possible for businesses to operate globally. However, some people argue that technology has also had a negative impact on communication, as people spend more time on their devices and less time interacting with each other in person. Another area where technology has had a significant impact is healthcare. Advances in medical technology have led to better diagnostic tools, more effective treatments, and improved patient outcomes. For example, telemedicine has made it possible for patients to consult with doctors remotely, which has make healthcare more accessible, especially in rural areas. However, there are also concerns about the cost of healthcare technology and the potential for privacy breaches. Technology has also transformed education, with online learning platforms and educational software making it possible for students to learn from anywhere in the world. This has opened up new opportunities for people who may not have had access to traditional education. However, there are also concerns about the quality of online education and the potential for students to become too reliant on technology. Finally, technology has changed the way we work and do business. Many jobs that were once done by humans are now being automated, which has led to job losses in some industries. However, technology has also created new job opportunities, particularly in fields like software development and data analysis. businesses have also benefited from technology, as it has made it easier to reach customers and streamline operations. In conclusion, technology has had a profound impact on our lives in the modern era. While it has brought many benefits, such as improved communication, healthcare, and education, it has also raised concerns about privacy, job losses, and the potential for people to become too reliant on technology. As we continue to develop new technologies, it is important that we consider both the benefits and the risks, and work to ensure that technology is used in a way that benefits society as a whole.

The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health care system in an effort to deal with the health issues involved. Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lessons in the school curriculum. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In nowdays, there are more and more people becoming obeses. This is a problame for healtcare system trying to solve the issues. I agree and think that more physical education classes in school curriculum is best way to address this problem, because of several reasons. To begin, adding more physical education for children in school will teach the younger generation to be more active from young age. This will become a habit for them. According statistics, the persentage of overweight people is increasing. More physical lessons in school will make sure children learn the importance of being healthy and active and will encourage them to keep this habbits as they grow older. Furthermore, obesity is putting pressure on health care system. When people are overweighted, they have to go to doctor and hospital more offten. This is costly for government. If, instead, we give children more physical classes in schools, we can prevent them from becoming too heavy in first place. Prevention is cheaper and easier than cure. So introducing more physical education for children will prevent many people from becoming obese, and it will save cost for healthcare system in future because there is less people who is heavy. To conclude, in my opinion, more physical lessons for school children is best way to deal with the obesety issue because it will teach children about healthy lifestyle from young age and also it will save money for helthcare system by preventing overweightness. Government should consider adding more physical activity into schools' timetable to address this problem.

In many parts of the world today there is a profitable market for products which lighten or whiten people's skin. Outline the reasons for using such products and discuss what effects they have in terms of health and society.

In most countrie, there is now a huge busines for creams and other products to make peoples skin whiter or lighter color. There are many reason why ppls want to use this products, and they can have a big impact on people health and the societys. One of main reason that make people want use skin whitening poduct is society pressur. In alot places, fair skin are see as more attractive and desirable, and dark skin can be look down upon. This leads many individuals, especially women, to try for change their natural skin color to fit in with this beauty standards. Another reason are that lighter skin may be perceived as sign of higher social status or wealth, as it indicate that person do'nt have to work outdoors. While these product may give people sattisfaction with their appearance, they can have really negative effects to health and socity both. Many skin lightening creams contains harmful chemical like mercury, which cause skin damage or even more serious issues over the time. Furthermore, the widespread us of these products can reinforce harmful stereotypes and discrimination based on skin color. It send message that dark skin are inferior and needs to corrected, which can have damaging impact for people self-esteem and mental helth. In conclusion, the popularity of skin whitening product is driven by societal pressures and beauty standards that value lighter skin tone. However, the use of these product pose serious risks to peoples health, and contribute to perpetuating damaging attitudes towards skin color diversities. It is important to challenge this beauty standards and promote acceptance, and celebrate the natural beauty of all skin colors.

My room at home You should write at least 150 words. You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. Describe your room at home. You should say: - where it is - what things it contains - what you do in your room and say how you feel about your room.

I live in house with my family which located in pune, india. My bedroom is in second floor of house. I have my own room since I was teenager. I like my room very much because it gives me privacy and space for doing my work and hobies. My room at home is very dear to me. It contaning a bed of course, and also desk were I do my studies. There also bookself with many books on it. I like reading very much so I have lot of book. I also have a closet for keeping my clothes. My room is not big, but it is enough for me personal space. In my room I like to read as I said. I also study here and sometimes watch movie on my laptop. I also doing my online class in my room since pandemic. My room is like my sanctuary, I feeling very relax and comfotable here. I can spending many hours in my room and never getting bored. In conclusing, my room is very special place for me. It may be simple but it have everything I needing. I am gratful to have my own room where I can studying, relax, and be myself. My room is truly my castle, as the saying going!

Rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

In my opinion, the move of rural people from countryside to cities is a negative development. There are several reasons why I think like this. Firstly, when people move in cities, there is less people left in countryside to do the agricultural work. This can lead to decreased food production and rising food prices, which affects everyone in a negative way. The farming is very importent for a country's economy and food security, so it is concerning if there are not enough people willing to do this work. Secondly, cities can become overcrowded when too many people move there from rural areas. This can put a strain to infrastructure and services, like housing, transportation, healthcare and education. If cities are not able to handle the increased population, it can lead to problems such as traffic congestion, insufficient housing, and inadequate access to basic services. This can make life in cities very challanging and stressful for everyone. Lastly, the move of people from rural areas to cities can also have negative social and cultural impacts. Rural communities have their own unique traditions and way of life that can be lost when people leave. This can lead to a loss of cultural diversity and a sense of community in both rural and urban areas. In conclusion, while there may be some benefits to people moving from countryside to cities, such as increased job opportunities and access to services, I believe that the negative impacts outway the positives. It is important for governments to find ways to support rural communities and make life in the countryside more attractive and sustainable for people.

ln mony ports of the world, children are given more freedom than in the past. ls this a positive or a negative development?

In recent years, children in many countries has been getting more freedom compared to the past times. This is a positive development in my opinion. There are several reasons why I believe this is good thing. Firstly, giving children more freedom allows them to develop their independence and decision-making skills. When children have the freedom to explore and make choices for themself, they learn how to think critically and solve problems on their own. This is important skill that will serve them well throughout their life. In contrast, if children are always told what to do and not given any freedom, they may struggle to make decisions and be independent as adults. Secondly, greater freedom for children can lead to increased creativity and innovation. When children has the freedom to pursue their interests and passions, they are more likely to come up with new ideas and solutions. This can benefit society as a whole, as these children may grow up to be the inventors, entrepreneurs, and leaders of tomorrow. If children are not given the freedom to explore and experiment, they may not develop their full potential. In conclusion, I believe that the trend towards giving children more freedom is a positive development. It allows children to develop important life skills and encourages creativity and innovation. While there may be some risks associated with giving children too much freedom, overall I think the benefits outweigh the drawbacks.

Environmental problems are too big for individual countries and individual persons to address. In other words, we have reached the stage where the only way to protect the environment is at an international level. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

I am greeing with it opinion to some extend. The environmant problems our world facing nowdays is very big and hard to sloving by just one country or persons. For exampal, the global warming affacting all the world not just one country so all countrys need work together for sloving this probelm. In other hand, i beleive that individuols and countryes can do alot to help the enviroment even when they work alone. For instence, if every person start recykling the garbege and stop using to much plastic, it will makes big different. Also, each country could make there own laws to protacting the enviroment like put hight takes on the factorys that polluting alot. In conclution, while i aggree that the best way to protact the environment is threw international colaborate, i still beleive that countrys and persons can do many by themselfs to help our planet. If everyones do there part even when it just small think, our world can be cleener and healtyer place four all of us.

Space travel has been possible for some time and some people claim that space tourism could be developed in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

In today's world, more and more people are believing that space travel, which is already possible now for long time, can be turned to space tourism in future. I think this is a positive development, because of several reasons. Firstly, space toursim will help humans to learn more about space. When more people will started going to the space, they will bring back lot of knowledge and experience which can be used by scientists to understand space better. For example, astronauts who went to moon brought back lot of information about moon's surface and atmosphere, which helped scientists to learn more about it. Similarly, space tourists will also bring back valuable informations which can be used for further research. Secondly, space tourism will also help in development of new technologies. To make space tourism possible, scientists and engineers will have work hard to develop new technologies, such as better spacecraft, better life support system, etc. These new technologies will not only be useful for space tourism, but can also be used in other areas, such as medicine, transportation, etc. For example, the technology used in space suits can be used to make better protective gears for firefighters and other emergency workers. In conclusion, I believe that development of space tourism is positive thing, as it will help in increasing our knowledge about space and also lead to development new technologies which can be used in many other areas.

Technology is important for education. Do you agree or disagree?

Nowdays, technology has become more and more important in our life, especially on education field. some people think that technology is very important for education, while others may disagree. In my oppinion, I strongly agree that technology plays a crucial role in education. Firstly, technology can make learning more interesting and engaging. For example, with the help of multimedia tools like videos, animations, and interactive simulations, students can better understand complex concepts and ideas. this can make learning more fun and enjoyable, and students will be more motivated to learn. additionally, technology can also provide students with access to a wealth of information and resources that they may not have access to otherwise. Secondly, technology can also help teachers to teach more effectively. For instance, teachers can use technology to create personalized learning experiences for their students. by using data analytics tools, teachers can track student progress and identify areas where students may need additional support. This can help teachers to tailor their teaching to the needs of individual students, and ensure that all students are able to succeed. In conclusion, I strongly believe that technology is very important for education. It can make learning more interesting and engaging for students, and help teachers to teach more effectively. While there may be some challenges associated with integrating technology into education, I believe that the benefits far outweigh the drawbacks.

The chart below shows the proportion of male and female students studying six art-related subjects at a UK university in 2011. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph describes what percent of male and woman arts studets choses different subject at one United Kingdom university on 2011. It can be clear seen that history of art and design have the most studens while music, drama, fine art attract less people. Also, the females on avery area outwight the males exceptt for architectural studys. On history of art, over 90% of students being females compared to below 10% being man. This seems to be most popular subjekt for women while only few men likes it. Design also have more woman than man but the different smaller, with around 70% woman and 30% man studying. Next subjekts have more similar proporties of man and women. Fien arts has the equal number of men and women stududents at 50% each aproximately. In music, there is bit more females at around 55% than males whos at 45% or so. Drama is prefered by females with rougly 60% copmared to 40% man. Finally, architecture have more man than female but also close to equal, with about 55% males and 45% woman students On conclusion, woman students clear prefered to study history of arts and dedign while men persue architecture a bit more. The other subject have closed to equal but stil higher percents of females exept for fine arts.

"Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organisation." Discuss this statement, including the possible reasons for this, and whether you think this is a positive or negative development.

In the recent years, there have been a growing trend of people choosing to work for themselves instead of being employed by a company or organization. I think there are several reasons why this is happening, and overall it can be seen as a positive development, although there are also some potential drawbacks. One of the main reasons why people chooses to be self-employed is because they want to have more control over their work and their schedules. When you are self-employed, you are your own boss and you can decide when and how you want to work. This can be especially appealing for people who have family obligations or other commitments that make it difficult for them to work a traditional 9-to-5 job. Additionally, being self-employed can often lead to a better work-life balance, as you are not tied to a set schedule or location. Another reason why people may choose the self-employment is because they have a specific skill or talent that they want to turn into a business. For example, someone who is good at graphic design or web development may decide to start their own freelance business rather than working for a company. This can be a great way to turn a passion into a career and to have more control over the types of projects you work on. However, there are also some potential drawbacks to being self-employed. One of the biggest challenges is that you are responsible for generating your own income, which can be stressful and uncertain at times. You also have to handle all of the administrative tasks associated with running a business, such as invoicing, taxes and marketing. This can be time-consuming and may require skills that you do not have. Overall, I believe that the trend towards self-employment is a positive development. It gives people more flexibility and control over their work and can lead to greater job satisfaction. However, it is important for anyone considering self-employment to carefully weigh the pros and cons and to have a plan in place for how they will generate income and manage their business.

Insufficient quantity of usable water is currently a major problem. What are the causes? How can we prevent it?

In a present day world, we are facing off with shortage of drinkable water and it is becoming more and more serious concern. There is many causes of these problem and also there is many ways to prevent it from being even worse in a future. The main cause of the insufficient water is the over consumption by the humans. As populations increases, demand for water also increases for daily uses like drinking, cooking and washing. But supply of clean water is not increasing at same rate. Another cause is polluting of rivers and lakes by factories and industrial waste. This makes water undrinkable and reduces available clean water even more. To preventing this problem from getting worse, government need to take strict action. They should putting limits on water usage per person and fine those who waste water. Educating people is also important, to make them understand importance of saving waters. Industries must be regulated strictly to prevent them from dumping waste in water bodies. Government should also investing in water treatment plants and desalination technology to increasing supply of usable water. In conclusion, shortage of clean water is serious issue with many causes like overuse and pollution. But it can be prevented by government action, regulation, education and investment in technology. We all have to work together to solve these problem before it becomes too late.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: The experience of travelling in a safari park or a wildlife sanctuary is much better than seeing animals in a zoo. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

Some people think that going to a safari park or wildlife sanctuary is more enjoyable and better than seeing animal in a zoo. I agree that experience is greater in safari or sanctuary because animals is free and behaving naturaly. First of all, when we goes to a zoo, the animals is in cages or small spaces. They cannot move around freely and do what they wants. For example, lions and tigers cannot hunt for there food, and monkeys cannot swing from tree to tree. This is not natural behaviour for them. In contrast, in a safari park or wildlife sanctury, the animals have much more spaces to roam and live as they would in the wild. We can see them hunting, playing, and interacting with each others in a more natural ways. Secondly, the animals in zoo may be stressed or unhappy because of the limited space and unnatural enviornment. They may pace back and forth or show others signs of distress. This is not good for their mental and physical well-being. On the other hand, animals in safari parks or sanctuaries are usually more relaxed and content because they have more freedom and can live in a more naturel habitat. Seeing animals in this enviornment is a much more authentic and rewarding experience for visitors. Moreover, going on safari or visiting a wildlife sanctuary often involves being out in nature and exploring beautifull landscapes. This adds to the overall experience and makes it more memorable and enjoyable than simply walking around a zoo. It is also an oportunity to learn about the animals natural habitats and behaviors from knowledgeable guides or rangers. In conclusion, I strongly agree that experience of seeing animals in a safari parkor wildlife sanctuary is superior to visiting a zoo. It allows us to see animals living freely and naturaly, which is better for their well-being and more educational and enjoyable for visitors. If we have the opportunitys, we should choose to observe wildlife in these more authentic settings.

The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph is showing information about closed shops and new shops from 2011 until 2018 in a country. This means the data for 7 years is displayed. The data is representing the number of this shops during that period. In the beginning of period, the number of closed shops is around 7000 while new shops is only 2750 approximately in 2011. This means the total shops is decreasing because more shops is closing than opening during this year. The number of closed shops is decreasing to around 6000 and 5000 in 2012 and 2013. While new shops is increasing to around 3200 and 4000 in same period respectively. Which means the difference between opening and closing is becoming smaller. After that, closed shops continue to decrease to around 2500 in 2015 and new shops continue increasing to around 4800 in same year, resulting in first year where new shops is higher than closed shops. The closed shops increases sharply to 5000 and 5500 and new shops decreases to 4000 and 3000 in 2016 and 2017 respectively. This means again the difference between opening and closing is becoming bigger but in opposite direction. In the final year 2018, the closed shops decreases sharply again to 3000 while new shops decreases a bit to 2750. This means the difference between them is very small and total shops is almost not changing in this year because of that. In conclusion, the number of shops is changing a lot during the period but in the end is almost same as the first year. The closed shops is decreasing in general and new shops is increasing overall creating an effect of stabilization.

Shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drinks that have been scientifically proven to be bad for people's health. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, there are many food and drinks which are been sold in shops that scientist proved its bad for health of people. I am agree shops should not allowed to sell this kind of things. There are some reason why i am think like this i will explain this below. Firstly, if shops sell food or drinks which are harmful to peoples health, it can lead more people to buy and use them. For example, if a shop sells the cigarettes, many people may tempt to buy it and start smoking, even if they know that its unhealthy. This is because when something is easily available, people are more like to try it or use it regularly, even if it is bad for them. Secondly, shops have responsibility to help to protect health of public by not selling products are dangerous. Shops are part from community and they should care about wellbeing of their customors. If they sell things what are proven to cause health problem, they are fail in their responsibility to community. Additionally, goverment should do regulation to prevent shops of selling these harmfull products, as it is government's role for protect citizens. In conclusion, I strongli agree that shops must not be allowed to sell any food and drinks which has been scientificly shown to be unhealthy. This is important for discourage people from consume these products and for shops to fulfill their responsibilities to society. Government should also plays a role in regulateing what shops can sell to protect public health.

Some feel that governments should prioritize healthcare instead of other important areas. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

I am agree that governments should prioritize healthcare among other areas. Healthcare is most important because it is matter of life and death for people. If peoples are not healthy, they can not work and contribute to society and economy. Healthy population is necessary for development and progress of any country. Firstly, governments have responsibility to ensure wellbeing of their citizens. It is duty of government to provide access to quality healthcare for all people, regardless of their income or social status. Government should invest in building hospitals, training doctors and nurses, and providing affordable medicines and treatments. This will ensure that everyone can get necessary medical care when they need it. Secondly, prioritizing healthcare can have long-term benefits for society. When peoples are healthy, they are more productive and can contribute more to economy. Healthy children can attend school and get good education, which will help them to get good jobs in future. Healthy adults can work and earn money to support their families. This can reduce poverty and improve overall quality of life for everyone. In conclusion, I strongly agree that governments should prioritize healthcare over other areas. It is essential for wellbeing of citizens and long-term development of society. Government should invest in healthcare infrastructure and ensure access to quality medical care for all people. This will create healthy and productive population that can contribute to progress and prosperity of nation.

Many parents encourage and prepare their children from an early age to attend a university and pursue a professional career. However, some people may not be suited for a job in the professional fields and would do better in other occupations, such as being a construction worker or a grocery store clerk. Should parents insist on a university education for their children, and is a university education necessary for someone to be successful in their chosen field?

Nowadays, many parents want their childs to go to university and have a professional career. They start preparing them from very young age for this. But, some people might be more suitable for jobs like construction worker or grocery store clerk instead of a professional job. I will discuss if parents should force their children to go to university and if university degree is needed to be successful in a choosed field. On the one hand, parents want best for their childrens and think that university degree is necessary for good life. They believe that professional career will give their children financial stability and respectable social status. Also, university education can help to develop critical thinking skills and gain knowledge in specific field. Parents may fear that without university degree, their children will struggle to find a well-paying job and have a difficulties in life. On the other hand, not everyone is suited for university education or professional career. Some people may have different talents and interests that are better suited for other types of jobs. For example, someone who enjoy working with their hands may be happier and more successful as a construction worker than as a lawyer. Someone who like interacting with people may be more fulfilled working as a grocery store clerk than as a doctor. Forcing a child to pursue a path that does not align with their strengths and passions can lead to stress frustration and unhappiness. Moreover, success in a chosen field does not always require a university degree. Many successful people have achieved great things without a formal education. For example, Bill Gates dropped out of university but went on to become one of the most successful business leaders in the world. Other people have built successful careers through hard work, talent and perseverance, without relying on a university degree. In conclusion, while parents may have good intentions in encouraging their children to go to university and pursue a professional career, it is important to recognize that this path may not be the best fit for everyone. Parents should support their children in exploring their interests and talents, and help them find a career path that aligns with their strengths and passions, regardless of whether it requires a university degree. Ultimately, success in a chosen field depends more on hard work, dedication and a love for what you do than on a specific educational background.

"Comparing the number and modes to travel to and from school in 1990 and 2010"

Schooling transport have big changes between 1990 and 2010. The two years has differences for the counts of students going school, and how they getting to school. First, quantity of kids in school becomes more on 2010. Schools size are increased and more childs are arriving at school everyday. In 1990s, familys was having less children so not as many go to class. But in 2010 the birth rates goes up so student counts is higher. More students mean more transport needed. Second, type of transport to school is different. In 1990, many student walked to school or took the buses. Not so much parents was driving them. In 2010, it is common for student to be drived to school by they're mom and dad. Walking becomes less because parents worry for safety. School bus are still used but not as often like in 1990. To conclusion, both amount of students and way they get to school is changed a lot from 1990 until 2010. More students needed transportation in 2010. Less took bus and walked, more got taken by car to school in 2010 comparing to 1990. This show how school transport can becoming different over the time.

Some children spend hours every day on smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Nowadays, childrens are spend too much time on smartphones. In my opinion this is a bad development and i will explain why i think so in this essay. First, there are some reasons that children are using smartphones for many hours per day. One reason is that smartphones have many interesting things, like games and videos. These make children to keep using them. Another reason is that some parents give phone to kids to entertain them when parents are busy. With the phone, children get busy and do not disturb parents when they have lot of works. As a result, smartphone usage among children is becoming more common this days. I think this is negative development. When children spend too much time on phones they do not go out and play with friends. This is harmful for their physical health, as they sit all time and do not get exercise. Also, childrens do not learn how to talk to people face to face, because they are only looking at screen and not talking. This can lead to social skills problems in future. In addition, using phones too much can distract from school works and study. As we can see, excessive phone usage has many bad consequences for kids. In conclusion, i believe children are spending lot of time on phones because of the entertainments that phones provide and because parents use phones to keep kids busy. However, this is not a positive trend as it can negatively impact children's health, social skills and studies. Parents need to limit the child's phone usage to avoid these issues.

Children are generally more successful in foreign language studies than adults. Thus, it is better to learn languages in childhood. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

I agree that children have more success with learning new languages than adult does. There are some main resons i think this way, which I will explain in this eassay. Firstly, chidren brain is more open and flexible to lern new things as compare with adult. They can absorbe vocabulary, grammer rules, and pronounciation of foreign languages more fast and easy. For instanse, if a chinese child move to america at young age, they will learn to speak english fluently in very short time, because there mind is like blank paper that can be easily write on. Adult, on opposite hand, their brain is already full of their native language, so its harder to add new one. Furthermore, childrens have more curiousity and intrest to explore new langauges and cultures. They see it as excite advanture and fun, not like boring class or work. When i was in primary school, we had foreign student from japan join our class. All students was very eager to talk with him and lern japanese words, it was like a game for us. But for adults, learning language seems like task or duty, not enjoyment. This lack of motivetion make it harder. In additon, children usually has more time and oppertunity to practice new language. They spend many hours in school and play with friends, so they constantly exposed to the language in natural setting. Adults are busier with job and family, so they dont have same chances to use and improve language skills everyday. Even if adult take language course, it only for few hours per week, not enough. To summarise, i strongly beleive that it is advantage to start learning foreign languages from young age, because of children brain plasticity, curiosity, and abundent chances to practice. Of course, adult can still lern new languages too if they are determine and put in effort. But for children it happens more naturally and efficiently.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Some people thinks it's better to stay ina same position hole there life, but the others not agree. It is not so easy question to respond for, so I will try to discuss my thougths. I partly agree with bouth statements. From one hand, doing the same things can feel safety and stability for a person. If he do his usuals activities every day, he will fill comfortable and not worry about anything. This easiness helps to calm down and relax from the world problems. Also, some people are just fraid of changes, so avoid it is a protection for themselfs. From another hand, making changes is good for people because we need to evalve and develop ourselfs. When we change something in life, it makes us go out from the comfort zone and that's how we can learn some thing new and usefull. For example, if you change your job, you probebly will get new knowledges and skills. Additionally, we just usually get boring when nothing happen in our lifes, so sometimes we defenetly need some refreshness. In my opinion, a balance between stability and changes is the best option. I think it's better to have a certain routine but also find a some ways to try new thing and not to be afraid if something change. Afterall, our life itself is a constant change, and we cant avoid it forever.