IELTS Writing Sample Essays and Model Answers

Parents should spend more time with their children helping them with their homework. Do you agree or disagree?

In my opinion, i am agree with this statement that parents have to spend more time help their children with homework. There are two reasons why i think like this, which i will explore in the following essay. To begin with, when parents help children with homework, it is good chance for them to bond together. In todays busy world, families dont have enough time to spend each other. Parents are working long hours and children are busy with their school and activities. But when parents sit with children and help them with homework, they can talk and spend quality time together. This help to improve relationship between parent and child. Secondly, children can learn better when they get help from their parents with homework. Parents know their children best and can explain things in way that children can understand easily. Also, parents can make sure that children are doing their homework properly and not just copying from friends or internet. This help children to learn better and get good grades in school. In conclusion, i believe that its very important for parents spend more time helping children with their homework because it help them bond with each other and also children learn better. Therefore, i am agree with this statement.

Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree?

I agree that wealthy nations should to help poorer countries when natural disasters happen. There are several reasons why I think this way. Firstly, wealthy nations have more resource and money to provide assistance to poorer countries. They can send food, water, medicine and other supplies that are needed in the aftermath of a disaster. They also have trained personnel such as doctors and engineers who can help with relief effort. Poorer countries often lack these resource and need help from other nations to cope with disasters. Secondly, helping poorer countries during disasters is a humanitarian duty. As human beings, we have a moral obligation to help others who are suffering, regardless of their nationality or economic status. Natural disasters can cause great deal of suffering and loss of life, and it is important that we do what we can to alleviate this suffering. Wealthy nations have the means to do this and should therefore step up to help. Finally, assisting poorer countries during disasters can also be in the interest of wealthy nations. Disasters can lead to instability, conflict and mass migration, which can have negative impact on neighboring countries and the world as a whole. By providing aid and support, wealthy nations can help to prevent these problems and promote stability and development in poorer countries. In conclusion, I strongly agree that wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. It is a moral duty, it is in everyone's interest, and wealthy nations have the resource and capability to make a real difference in these situations.

Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, some people think that everybody should donate a fixed amout of their income to support charity. While I believe that supporting charities is important, I disagree with the idea that everyone should be required to contribute a set portion of their income. Firstly, people's financial situations can vary greatly. Some individuals may struggle to make ends meet and may not have the means to donate a fixed percentage of their income without compromising their own well-being or that of their family. Forcing everyone to donate a set amount could place an undue burden on those who are already financially stretched. Additionally, people should have the freedom to decide how to spend their hard-earned money based on their own priorities and values. Secondly, rather than mandating a fixed donation amount, I believe that encouraging voluntary contributions and raising awareness about the importance of supporting charities would be more effective. When people have the autonomy to choose how much they want to give, they may be more likely to donate generously and feel a greater sense of personal fulfillment from their contributions. Governments and organizations can play a role in promoting charitable giving through tax incentives, public campaigns, and partnerships with charities. In conclusion, while I strongly support the idea of donating to charities, I disagree with the notion that everyone should be required to contribute a fixed portion of their income. It is important to consider individuals' financial circumstances and respect their freedom to make their own decisions regarding charitable giving. Encouraging voluntary donations and raising awareness about the positive impact of supporting charities would be a more effective approach to promoting philanthropy in society.

Some people say now there is less communication between family members than in the past.

In todays world, many people think that the family communication is decreasing compared to the past. I agree with this staement because of tecnology and busy lifestyle of people nowadays. First of all, technology has made people to communicate less with their family members. In the past, people use to talk to each other face to face because there was no tecnology like mobile phones or internet. But now, people are always on their phones or laptops even when they are at home with their family. For example, when I go to my friend's house, I see that everyone in his family is busy with their own devices and they hardly talk to each other. Secondly, people have become very busy in their lives and they don't have time for their family. Everyone is busy with their work or studies and they don't have time to sit and talk with their family members. For instance, in my family, my father goes to office early in the morning and comes back late at night. My mother is also working and she comes home tired. So, we hardly get time to talk to each other. In conclusion, I believe that technology and busy lifestyle has reduced the communication between family members as compared to the past. People should try to spend more time with their family and communicate with each other face to face instead of using tecnology all the time.

Nowadays, not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries. What are the reasons for this problem? What are the effects on society?

Nowadays, there is a problem that less students are choosing science subjects at university in many countries. There are several reasons why this problem exists, and it can have significant effects on our society. There are some reasons why not enough student choose science subject at unversity. One of the reasons is that many students find science subjects more challenging and difficult compared to the other subject. Science subjects often require more time and effort to study, which can be intimidating for some student. Additionally, there is a perception that science subjects may not lead to as many job opportunities as other fields, such as business or humanities subjects. This make some students hesitate to pursue science degree. The lack of students in science field can have negative effect on the society. With fewer individuals pursuing science degrees, there may be a shortage of qualified professionals in fields such as medicine, engineering and technology. This can lead to a slowdown in scientific research and innovation, which is crucial for society advancement. Furthermore, a lack of science literacy in the general population can result in poor decision-making on important issues like public health policies, environmental conservation, and technological development. In conclusion, the problem of not enough students enrolling in science subjects at university level has several underlying reasons and can have far-reaching effects on society. It is important for educators and the policy maker to address this issue by promoting the importance and benefits of science education, and by providing support and resources to encourage more students to pursues science degrees.

The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.

The given diagrams illustrates the primary motivations for education among pupils of various ages, as well as the level of assistance they get from their companies. It can be clearly seen that career goals and interest are the top reasons across all age ranges, while employer support decreases with age. Looking at the first graph more closely, it is evident that both career and interest are consistently the most common reasons for studying, at around 80% each for under 26 year olds. Interest becomes slightly more prevalent among 26-29 year olds and remains the dominant factor for those over 30. On The other hand, studying for career reasons drops significantly with age to just 40% for the oldest group. The proportion studying to change their employment stays relatively stable at 10-20%. Turning to the second chart, we can see that employer support is highest for the youngest students at nearly 70%. It Drops noticeably for 26-29 year olds to around 30% before declining further to just over 20% for those in their 30s. Overall, this suggests that younger pupils tend to have more backing from their companies. In summary, the data indicates that career aspirations and personal interest are the major drivers for education at all ages, but career becomes less important for older students. At the same time, employer support decreases steadily with age. Improving english communication skills are very important for achieving academic and professional success in today's globalized world.

In your opinion, why is the circus still a popular form of entertainment in the modern electronic age?

The circus having been popular entertainment for many years even before TVs and computer. It is surpriseing that in this day of modern electronic entertainment, peoples are still attending to circus for amusement and fun. There is some reasons why I believe the circus is still quite popular today. Firstly, going to circus is very difference experience than watch television or play video game at house. At the circus, you are siting with croud of people and watching the preformances in real life. The atmosphere is exciting with all of the peoples around and the liveliness of circus environment. Also the circus have many unique acts that you cannot seen anywhere other. Where else can you watching a person to be shooted out of cannon or see a elephants standing on tiny stool? These types of amazing feets can only been seen live at circus. Even with all the special effects of movies an TV, they can not compare to reel life thrils and excitingness of circus acts. For those reasons, I belief that circus will remain popular type of entertainment for long time, even in world of iPhones and Xboxes. People will always enjoy getting out of house and experiensing the unique wanders and atmostphere that only a circus can provide.

In your opinion, why is the circus still a popular form of entertainment in the modern electronic age?

In my opinion, circus is still popular entertainment in the modern age because of several reason. Firstly, circus provide unique experience that cannot be replicated through electronic medium like TV or Internet. When people go to circus, they can see the amazing feats of acrobatics, juggling, and animal tricks in real life, which is much more exciting then watching on a screen. Secondly, circus have a long history and tradition that appeals to many people. Circus have been around for centuries, and they are a part of cultural heritage in many countries. Going to the circus can be a nostalgic experience for adults who remember attending as children, and they want to share that experience with their own kids. Circus also often travel from town to town, which add to their mystique and make them feel like special events. Thirdly, circus offer a sense of wonder and escapism that people crave in the modern world. With all the stress and problems of daily life, sometimes people just want to forget their troubles and be amazed by something extraordinary. Circus provide that opportunity to step outside of normal routine and experience something truly magical and entertaining. In conclusion, while electronic entertainment is ubiquitous today, circus still hold a special place in people's hearts because of their uniqueness, tradition, and sense of wonder. As long as circus continue to innovate and create new acts that capture the imagination, they will likely remain popular for many years in the future.

Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on your children. Do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, computers have become a essential part of our daily life. Children are using computers more and more, both at school and at home. While there are some benefits to this increased computer usage, I believe that overall, the negatives outweigh the positives. On the one hand, there are several reasons why using computers can be beneficial for children. Firstly, computers can be a valuable educational tool. Many schools now use computers as part of their teaching methods, and children can use educational software to learn new skills and knowledge. Additionally, using computers can help children develop important technological skills that will be useful in their future careers. However, there are also significant downsides to childrens spending too much time on computers. One major issue is the impact on children's physical health. Spending long hours sitting in front of a computer can lead to problems such as obesity, eyestrain and back pain. Morever, excessive computer use can also have negative effects on children's social development. Children who spend too much time on computers may have difficulty developing social skills and forming relationships with their peers. In conclusion, while there are some benefits to children using computers, I believe that the negatives are more significant. It is important for parents to limit their children's computer usage and ensure that they engage in other activities such as physical exercise and social interaction. Only then will children be able to enjoy the benefits of computers without experiencing the potential negative consequences.

In today's digital age, anyone with a smartphone can capture and share photographs. This accessibility to photography diminishes the value of professional photographers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In todays world where technology has become ubiquitous, it is common to see people take a photo with their smartphones or cameras. Some people argue that this trend make the professional photographs less valued. Although I acknowledge this point, I am of the opinion that professional photograps are still very much in demand and appreciated. It cannot be disputed that almost everyone has a smartphone these days with camera function. People take pics of their daily lives, food they eat, places they travel and share on social medias. This has indeed made it easier for average person to capture moments and produce good quality photographs without needing to hire professionaly photographers. For example, many newly wedded couples choose to rely on their friend and family to capture photos at their wedding rather than pay for expensive photographers. However, I believe that professional photograpy still has its place in our society and will continue to be valued. This is because they possess skills, experience and equipments that allow them to produce photos of a much superior quality than what smartphones are capable of. Professional photographer know how to manipulate elements like lighting, angles and backdrop to creat stunning visual effects. Their works often appear in magazine, advertisement, and other commercial contexts where high quality images are essential. Also, there will alwys be occasions where people want to have photos taken by experts. For instance, many still prefer to have their pre-wedding, baby or family portrats shot in studios by photographers. The end products are perceived as more precious and meaningful than causal shots on phones. In conclusion, while the wide availability of camera phones might have reduced our reliance of professional photography for daily snapshots, I believe that their services are still hihgly valued and sought after for special events and commercial purposes.

Some people say it is government's responsibility to transport children to school, while others believe parents should transport their children to school. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Nowadays, there are many opinions about who responsibility it is to bring students at school, government or parents. This assay will discuss both sides of this issue and give my personal view on the topic. On one hand, governments has an obligation to provide education for all childrens. This include not just the school buildings and teachers, but also making sure that every child can go to school. For many poor families, paying for transportation to school is very difficult, and this can prevent their kids from getting an education. If government provides free buses or other transportation, it helps to make sure that all childrens have equal access at education, regardless of their family's income. Additionally, school buses can be safer than other modes of transportation, as they are designed specifically for carrying students and have trained drivers. However, there are also arguments for why parents should be responsible to bring their own children to school. Firstly, it can be seen as part of a parent's duty to take care of their child's needs, which includes making sure they get to school on time every day. Some people believe that relying on government for everything can make people to become too dependent and less self-sufficient. Moreover, if parents bring their kids to school themselves, they have more flexibility in terms of timing and can better fit the school run into their own schedules. They also have opportunity to spend more time with their child and be more involved in their education. In my opinion, I believe that government should provide transportation to school for students who need it, especially those from low-income families. However, for parents who are able to bring their children to school themselves, they should be encouraged to do it. Perhaps government can offer incentives or support for parents who choose to transport their own kids, such as tax breaks or subsidies for fuel costs. Ultimately, the most important thing is ensuring that all childrens are able to get to school safely and regularly, regardless of their family's circumstances.

WRITING TASK 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. You are a member of an organisation which meets regularly at a particular restaurant. The most recent meal you had there was not satisfactory. Write a letter to the manager of the restaurant. In your letter explain why you are writing describe what went wrong with the meal and service suggest what the manager should do to ensure that you and your group return to the restaurant You do NOT need to write any addresses. Begin your letter as follows: Dear Sir or Madam, You should write at least 150 words.

Dear Sir or Madam, I am writing to you about the bad experience I had at your restaurant when I visited last Monday with my organization. We are coming to your restaurant for long time and we was always satisfied, but this time everything was really bad. First, when we arrived, no one greeted us or showed us to our table. We had to find the table ourself. Then, it took very long time for waiter to come and take order. When food finally arrived, it was cold and taste bad. The waiter was very rude when we complained, and he said there is nothing he can do. To make sure that we will come back to your restaurant, I suggest you train your staff better in customer service. The food should also be hot and tasty like it used to be. If you can make these changes, we will be happy to visit your restaurant again for our regular meetings. I hope you will take my suggestions seriously and make the necessary improvements. Looking forward to your response. Yours faithfully, [Your Name]

Many stores sell organic fruits and vegetables (produced without the use of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides) even though they often cost more than conventional fruits and vegetables. Why do some people prefer to eat organic food? Do you think organic food is worth the extra cost? Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

These days, a lot of shops they sells the organic fruits and many vegetables that do not use any chemical fertilizers and pesticide or herbicide, even though price is often much more expensive comparing to normal regular fruits and vegetables. There are some few reason why a people will choose to eat organic food instead the conventional one. First of all, the main reason for eating organic foods is because they is more healthful. They do not contains any harmful chemical residue from the pesticides, fertilizer and herbicides which can remain on the food and be consumed. Research shows those residues they can leads to health issues like the cancer, developmental delay in children, and cause problem with fertility and reproduction ability. So people who care about their health will want to avoid foods with those type chemicals remain on it. Another reason why the people prefer organic food is because it often tastes more better. Since those foods are grow in natural ways without chemical inputs, they tends to have more stronger flavour and be more fresh and ripe when harvest. Also, organic farming methods is better for the environment because they do not pollute soil or water. A lot people like to support this more sustainable way for agriculture production. However, organic food have some drawbacks too, mainly the high price. It can cost much more than regular produce, sometimes even double price or higher. This means that a lot of people can not afford it, especially if they have big family or low income job. Another issue is limited availability - many stores do not carry much organic products, or selection is very less. This can make it more inconvenient or impossible for some people to buy it regularly. In my opinion, I think organic food is worth the extra cost if you have the budget to afford it. The health and environmental benefits are very important. Whenever I can, I try to buy organic product for my family, especially for items we eat the most often like apples, spinach, potatoes. It gives me peace of mind to know we are avoiding those pesticides. But I understand it is not feasible for everyone to pay more for organic all the time. We each have to make the best choice we can base on our own situation and priorities.

Some people think that students should work and study at the same time, while others believe students should focus only on their studies. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In the nowadays, we have an common discuss regarding if students should combinning thier studyings with workings, or other persons is believing that students need to concerntrate on their studying only. I am going to explore both of these opinion and will also tell you my thinking. Firstly, those who are supposing that student should work and study in same timing, they may be argueing that it helps student to get importance exposure and skillsing in the real world. When students are working, they meeting diference people and also learning how to managing their timings and responsibilities. They can use this all experience after they have graduate to find better jobs and to be more succesfull. So they are saying it beneficial for their future. On other hands, the persons who belief that studying should be prioritize, they maybe thinking that studying require full focus and attention. If students work at the same timing, it can distract them from thier studying and effect their education nagatively. They may also be worry that students will get exhaust from working and not have energy to studying properly. Their argument is that studying should come first always, and working can be done later after student have complete education. In my opinion, I am thinking that students should focusing on their studying mostly, but could also work part time if they wants to gain experience. But the working should not effecting their studying in a bad manners. So maybe they can work on weekend or holyday to get experience but not compromise thier studying. If they can manageing both things, then I think it okay, but studying should be priority always. In conclusion, I believe that both point of view have validity, but my think is that studying should come first for students and working can be done after or in limit amount if possible without disturbance to education. It is important for student to focus on thier studying to get good marks and build strong foundation for the future.

The bar chart below shows the results of a survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on two groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance.

The bar charts is illustrating result from the survey about how different factors effecting the job performances of two age groups of employee, the younger group from 18 to 30 years old and older group between age 45 to 60. For each categories, the employees was asked to indicate if those factors has a positive or negative impact, or no impact on their job. Looking at the younger workers group, the factor that most of them says have positive effect to their work is family and next is health. Interestingly for young people, family give benefit more than it cause trouble. Salary and work environment both equal at around 55% saying it's positive factor. However, over half of 18-30 years old think that relationship at work is not important factor. For the other group with people in the older ages range, is very apparant the large different between health and family compare to younger people result. Almost 100 percentage point family as positive factor, while health drops to less than a half from around 80% for 18-30 group. We can see similar pattern in term of environment at work and salary as well. In summary, the two age groups have big gap in how family and health affect their work performances. Relationship become more important as people get older but salary and work environment stay about the same in the level of significance.

The line graph shows the number of passengers at a Paris Metro station. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The image is showing the amount of people which uses paris metro station by line grahp. The x-axees is showing the time by hours and y-axees is showing the number of passengers by thousands. The graph have two lines, one is blue and one is red. Both lines starting from 6am and slowly going up until around 8am in the morning. Then blue line keep going up but red line go down little bit before also going up again until around 6pm. After 6pm both line start going down but blue line going down more faster then red line. To summaries, both line showing similar pattern throughout the day with morning and evening having highst number of passengers. But blue line always have more pasengers then red line exept early morning and late night when they have almost same.

The diagram below shows the number of landline telephones per 1000 people in different countries over a five-year period.

The diagram provide information about the landline telephone per one thousand people in seven country, over five years perod. Overall, the diagram ilustrates that in most country, the number of landline telephones has increased during this time period, although there are some exceptions. In first place, Canada had the highest number of landline telephone per 1000 person in 2000, at around 680. This number increase over the 5 years and reached almost 700 telephone per 1000 people in 2005. Similarly, the United State also saw an grow in landline telephone, from approximately 650 per 1000 people in beginning to over 675 in end of period. Germany and United Kingdom both started with lower levels, around 550-570 per 1000 people, but they too showed steady rise and ended up with around 600-650 telephone per 1000 people. On the other hand, the number of landline telephone in Italy remain relatively stable over the 5 years, starting and end at about 450 per 1000 people. Russia and China had the lowest level of landline, both starting around 200-250 telephones per 1000 person. While Russia saw a small increase to around 280 by 2005, China telephone number remain flat throughout period. In conclusion, the diagram shows that most country experience growth in landline telephone over the 5 years, but the rate of increase varied between nations, with some country like Italy and China seeing little to no change during this time frame.

Some people work for the same organisation all their life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Some peoples work in the same company for all of them life. However, others prefer to change job many times in lifes. I will discuss both point of views and give my opinion. There are several benefit for staying at one organization. Firstly, you can build strong relationships and good team with colleagues when working together for long time. This can lead to better cooperations and more effectives work. Additionaly, staying at same company shows loyality, which can be rewarded with promotions and pay increase. People who stay long time also have very good knowledge of company and how it works, so they can be very valuable. On the other hand, changing job can also have advantages. Working in difference places gives you more varied experience and skills. This can make your CV more impressive and help you to find better job in future. Moving to new company can also mean getting higher salarly and more interesting work. It prevents boredom from doing same thing for too long time. In my opinion, I think it is good to stay with one organizations for a while to gain experience and show commitment. But it is also important to be open for new oportunities and change job if it offer better prospects. The best approach is probbaly to find balance between stability and variety in career. To conclude, there are benefits to both staying in same job and changing company. It depend on individual situation and priorities. But combining both in career can give most advantages.

Some people say free time activities for children should be organized by parents. Others say that children should be free to choose what they do in their free time. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Nowadays, the childhood and the spending of child free time is a controversal issue. Some people argue that parents should arrange free time of children. However, others believe that children must be freedom to decide what to do in there free time. In this essay i will discus both views and give opinion. On the one hand, there are several reasons why parents should organized free time activities for children. Firstly, parents have more experience and knowledge than children, so they can choose activities that are more benefit and suitable for their child's development. For example, a parent may sign their child up for a sport team or music lessons, which can help the child to develop physical skills, creativity and social skills. Secondly, when parents arrange activities for their children, it can ensure that the child is spending their free time in a productive and safe way. This can prevent the child from engaging in activities that may be harmful or a waste of time, such as watching too much television or playing video games all day. On the other hand, there are also arguments in favor of allowing children to choose their own free time activities. One reason is that it can help to develop the child's independance and decision-making skills. When children are given the freedom to decide how to spend their free time, they learn how to make choices and take responsibility for their own actions. Additionally, allowing children to pursue their own interests can lead to greater motivation and enjoyment in their free time activities. If a child is forced to participate in activities that they do not enjoy, it may lead to resentment and a lack of engagement. In my opinion, I believe that a balance approach is best. Parents should provide guidance and support to their children in choosing free time activities, but also allow for some level of freedom and choice. Parents can suggest activities that they think would be beneficial for the child, but ultimately allow the child to make the final decision. This can help to ensure that the child is engaged and motivated in their free time pursuits, while also receiving the necessary guidance and support from their parents. In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides of this issue, I believe that a balanced approach is the most appropriate. By providing guidance and support while also allowing for some level of freedom and choice, parents can help their children to develop important skills and pursue their interests in a productive and enjoyable way.

In the past, husbands went out to work while wives stayed at home to take care of the children. What do you think were the advantages or disadvantages of only men working? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

In past times, it was a normal situation that men go out to do working, and the women wives are stay at home to caring for kids. There were some good and bad things about this arrange. The biggest advantage i think was the wife are able to give full attention for raising the childs. They had plenty time to take care them, to play with them, and to teach them important lessons to become good adults. Mothers can really focous on childrens needs when they not need to worrying about work too. My own mother was a housewife when i was young boy, and i have much good memory of her always be there for us kids. But in other hand, there were also some negative affect of this way to organise family. One problem is wife become very depended on husband for all the money and support. They dont have own income. So if something happen to husband, like he get sick or lose job, then big trouble for whole family. I remember my aunty, she never had job because uncle work in factory. But then he have accident and cant work no more. They had much difficulty to manage after that. Also i think its not so easy for the womans who have to stay home all time. Maybe they feel bored or lonely sometime, miss adult company and conversasion. My mother love being with us childs, but she always so happy to chat with neighbor lady or her sister on phone, I remember. It is hard job to raise kids alone all day with no break or help from others isn't it. So in conclusion, there good and bad side of this past arangement where only the man work outside. Its ok if everything going well, but have some risk if problems happen. And can be challenging for wife to handle everythings alone all time. I believe its more better when husband and wife both share the earning and raising kids together as a partner.

You recently booked a part-time course at a college. You need to cancel your booking. Say which part-time course you booked. Explain why you need to cancel your booking. Ask about booking a different course.

Dear Sir or Madame, I am write to you regarding the part-time course i have recently booked at you're college. The course was on Modern Painting Techniques, which starts in 1 month from now and take place every Saturday morning. However, i regretfully must cancel my booking for this course. The reason is because my work schedule have suddenly changed, and I now need to work on Saturday mornings when the course is scheduled. This change in my work schedule was unexpected, and I apologize for any inconvenience caused by my cancellation. I would like to ask if it would be possible to booking a different part-time course instead, one that takes place on weekday evenings or Sunday. Do you have any course on Modern Painting Techniques or similar subjects that fit this schedule? I am very interested in learning about this topic and would greatly appreciate the opportunity to take a course at your college. Thank you for understanding and I look forward to hearing back from you soon. Sincerely, [Your Name]