IELTS Writing Sample Essays and Model Answers

Ordinary people often try to copy famous people that they read about in magazines or see on TV. Why do you think this happens? Do you think it is a good idea to copy famous people?

Nowadays, a lot of people try to imitate celebrities what they see on television or in magazines. There is couple reasons for this trend, which I will explain in following paragraphs. In my opinion, it is not a good idea to copy famous people in this way. There are two main reasons why people try to be like celebrities. Firstly, they want to feel successful and important like the famous person. They think if they dress and act in same way, they will have similar lifestyle and achievements. Secondly, people copy celebrities because they are bored with there own life. They want to escape from reality and pretend to be someone else for a while. However, I believe it is a bad idea to imitate famous people. One reason is that it is not genuine. Everyone should be thereself and not try to be someone else. It is important to be authentic and true to yourself. Another reason is that celebrities often have unhealthy lifestyles. They may take drugs, drink too much alcohol, or have eating disorders. Copying these behaviours can be very dangerous for ordinary people. In conclusion, many people try to copy celebrities because they want to feel important or escape from there own life. However, this is not a good idea because it is not authentic and can be unhealthy. We should appreciate our own unique qualities and not try to be like someone else.

Plastic bags, plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment. What damage does plastic do to the environment? What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem?

In recent year, people used more and more plastic materials like plastic bags, bottles and boxes. This trend has cause a lot of damage to the enviroment. In this essay I will discus the negative affect of plastic to the nature and what govenrments and people can do to solve this issue. First of all, plastic products do great harm to the environment. They are not bio-degradable, which means they can not be decomposed by bacterias or other micro organisms. As a result, when they are throwed away, they will stay in the land or ocean for hundreds of years. During this period, they will release toxic chemicals which pollute the soil and water. What's more, animals may eat them by mistakes and get sick or even die. However, there are some measures that goverments and individuals can take to adress this problem. For goverments, they can make laws to limit the production and usage of plastics. For example, they can ban the free plastic bags in supermarkets and encourage people to use eco-friendly shopping bags instead. They can also invest more money in research and developement of biodegradable plastics. For individuals, we should reduce our reliance to plastic proudcts in daily life. We can bring our own bags when shopping, use glass or metal containers to store food, and recycle plastic waste properly. In conclusion, plastic materials have brought severe damage to our planet. It is important that goverments take actions and people change their habits to protect the environment. Only in this way can we build a sustainable future for ourself and later generations.

It is suggested that all young adults should undertake a period of unpaid work, helping people in the community. Do you agree or disagree?

In todays globalized world, it have been suggest that all young adults shold take part in period of voluntary community service. I personally agree to this idea because I belief unpaid work can provide numerous benefit to both youngsters and society as whole. Firstly, doing voluntary work can be extremely value experience for young people. It give them opportunity to gain practikal skills and knowledge that they cannot acquire through formal education alone. For example, by helping out at local charity or community organization, they can learn about teamwork, communication, and problem solve. Additionally, unpaid work can also help young adults to develope a sense of social responsibility and empathy for others. By work with people from different backgrounds and circumstances, they can broaden their perspective and become more aware of issues face by their community. Secondly, unpaid work by young adults can have significant positive impact on society as whole. Many community organizations and charities rely heavily on volunteers to carry out their important work. By contribute their time and energy, young people can help to support vital services and programs that benefit those in need. Morover, by encourage more young adults to engage in voluntary work, we can foster a culture of active citizenship and social engage. This can lead to stronger, more cohesive communities and a more compassion society overall. In conclusion, I strong believe that all young adults should undertake period of unpaid work in their community. Not only can it provide them with value skills and experience, but it can also make a real difference to lives of others. By promote voluntary work among young people, we can create a more caring and connect society for everyone.

Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

It is common discussion about weather it is good to stay in one organation or change it during life. The both sides have their own advantages and disadvanages. I will discuss both this views and give my opinion in this essey. On the one hand, staying in a same organisation has many benifits. Firstly, people can have a stable carrer and do not need to worry about loosing job. Secondly, they can get promotions more easily because the company nows them well. Thirdly, they can make good relationships with coworkers and feel comfertable in work environment. On the another hand, changing organisations also has some advantages. Firstly, people can learn new skills and get diffrent experiences by working in various companies. This can help them to develop their career and find better job opportunities. Secondly, changing organisations can prevent boredom and provide new challanges, which can be motivating for some peple. Thirdly, it can help to build a wider network of contacts in the industry. In my openion, I think that it depends on individual preferences and carrer goals. Some people may prefer stability and long-term commitment to one organisation, while others may prefer diversity and new challanges. Personally, I belive that it is good to have a balance of both. Starting a carrer in one company and staying there for a while to gain experience and build relationships, and then considering changing organisation if there are better opportunities or if one feels stagnent. The most important thing is to make decisions based on personal values and aspirations. In conclusion, working for the same organisation or changing it has both benefits and drawbaks. It is a personal choice that depends on individual circumstances and goals. The key is to find a balance that works best for oneself and to be open to new opportunities while also valuing stability and commitment.

The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart is showing the change in persentage of british people that donated to charity in 1990 and 2010, separated into age groups. Overall, there are increase in the amount of people who give money to charity from 1990 to 2010 across all age ranges. In 1990, the groop with the highest percentage of donors were 45-54 years old at around 32%. The lowest were the 16-24 age range, at just above 15% of peeple. The 25-34 and 35-44 age ranges had similar persentages at around 20-25%. 55-64 and over 65s were also close, between 25-30%. Moving to 2010, all age ranges saw a increase in the persentage of peeple giving to charity. The most significant raise was in the 16-24 group, going from around 15% to nearly 30%, almost doubling. 35-44 and 45-54 also had big growth to over 40% each. Now the highest persentage group is 35-44 at about 42%. 55-64 and over 65 grew to around 35% of peeple donating. In summary, there was a overall increase in british people across all ages giving money to charities from 1990 to 2010. The standout growth areas was 16-24, 35-44 and 45-54 age ranges. But in 2010, 35-44 year olds are now the most generous groop in terms of persentage.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: Music Music is an important part of all human societies, both past and present. Nowadays we can listen to music from many different parts of the world and from many different historical eras. Do you think this is a positive development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

Music are very important to societies past and present. In the past, peoples can only listen the music from they own culture and time period. But now, music from across the world and times is avalaible to listen. I think it is positive. Firstly, listen to music from different places can help people learn about new cultures. When you listened the instruments, rhythmics, and styles of music from a place, you get idea of what that culture is likes. For example, listening African drums music can show how the rhytm is important in that cultures. Or listening Chinese opera tell you about China history storys. So music is a window to understand other people in world. Secondly, it important to know music from past also. All the music we has today is based on musik that came before. Classical music from Europe in 18th century still influencing pop music today. Blues music from Americka 100 years ago is part of all the rock and hop-hop we has now. By listen old music, we understand better how modern music develuped. We get a sense music evolves over time. In conclusion, I believe it very positive trend that musics from all over the world and history is now avaliable to any one. It allow people know other cultures and understand musik history. It connecting people across distance space and time.

Some people say that the main aim of advertising is to improve sales of products that people do not really need. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In today's world, advertising has becoming a big part of our lifes. We see advertisements everywhere - on television, billboards, and even on our phones. Some peoples believe that the main purpose of advertising is to sell products that we don't actually need. I am agree with this view to a certain extent. On the one hand, many advertisements are designed to make us want things that we don't really require. For example, a new smartphone with a slightly better camera or a faster processor. Our current phone may be working just fine, but the advertisement will try to convince us that we need to upgrade. This kind of advertising can lead to people buying things unnecessarily, just because they have been convinced by clever marketing. However, on the other hand, advertising also plays an important role in informing people about new products that could actually be useful to them. For example, an advertisement for a new type of energy-efficient light bulb could encourage people to switch to a product that saves them money and is better for the environment. In this case, the advertising is not just about improving sales, but also about providing information. In conclusion, while I agree that some advertising is designed to make us buy things we don't need, I also believe that advertising can serve a useful purpose. It is up to us as consumers to be aware of the persuasive techniques used in advertisements and to make informed decisions about what we really need.

Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

Some people belive that it is good to have much money even if that mean lesser free time for themself, while other people think it better to have more free times and less salary. In this essay I will discuss both opinion and say which one I aggree with the most. On one hand, person who earn much money can buy more things - they afford big house, luxory car and expensive holiday. They can go to better restaurent and wear nice cloth. Money also give seciurity - no need worry about pay bills or save for emerginces. With more many, people provide better life for they family too. However, free time is also very importance. When people has more free time, they do hobby and relacks. They can spend time with family, friend, travell, and excersise. Free time help reducing stress and improveing health. Withouth free time, life can be very boring and repetetive, only working all time. In my opinion, i think balance is best. People need enougth money to live comfortible, but also need free some time for themself. If focus only on one - either earn money or free time, life not complete. We should try find middle ground - work for good salary but still keep free times for important thing in life like family and hobby. In conclusien, both money and free times has it benefits, but we need some of both to live happiest life. How much of each depend on personal preferrence, but balanse is the key.

"Movies and music files should be free for everyone to download." To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

Nowadays, there is a big debate about whether movies and music files should be free for everyone to download or not. I disagree with this statement because i think it is not fair for the people who make the movies and music. First of all, making a movie or a song takes a lot of time and effort. The people who make them need to be paid for their work. If everyone can download them for free, then the people who make them will not get any money. They may stop making movies and music if they cannot earn a living from it. Secondly, movies and music are like any other product. When we go to the store to buy food or clothes, we have to pay for them. We cannot just take them for free. The same should be true for movies and music. If we want to enjoy them, we should be willing to pay for them. Finally, there are already many ways to watch movies and listen to music for free. For example, we can borrow them from the library or from friends. We can also watch them on TV or listen to them on the radio. So there is no need to make them free for everyone to download. In conclusion, I believe that movies and music should not be free for everyone to download. The people who make them deserve to be paid for their work, just like anyone else. We should find other ways to enjoy movies and music without downloading them illegally.

People should give importance to family.

Family is the most important thing in life, i think. In my opinion, people should give high importance to family because family is always there for us no matter what happen. Family provide us with love, support, and care that we need to survive and suceed in life. Firstly, family is the only constant thing in our lifes. Friends come and go, but family is forever. They are the people who know us best and accept us for who we are, flaws and all. In times of trouble or hardship, it is our family that we turn to for comfort and guidance. They are our rock and our anchor, helping us weather any storm. Secondly, family help shape our values and beliefs. From a young age, our family teach us right from wrong and instill in us the morals and principal that will guide us throughout our lives. They also provide us with a sense of identity and belonging, helping us understand our place in the world. Without the influence of family, we would be lost and adrift. In conclusion, i believe that people should prioritize family above all else. Family give us the love, support, and guidance we need to thrive and suceed in life. They are our constant companions on this journey, and we must cherish and nurture those relationship always.

People prefer living in a village but some people prefer to live in a city.

Living in a village or city have both advantage and disadvantage. Some people prefer the quietness of village, while other like the busyness of city life. I will descuss both side of this issu and give my oppinion. On one hands, village life is more peaceful. The air is cleaner and fresher in village, since there are many tree and gras. There are also fewer polution from cars and factorys. In addition, the cost of living in village is lower then city. Foods and housing is cheaper. Peoples in village are also friendlyer, as they know each other well. On the other hand, city have more opportunity. There are more job in city, especally for youngs people who just gradute from university. City also has better infracstructure, like publik transport, hospital, and shoping mal. Furthermore, city offer more entertaiment option such as movie theater, restaurant, and night club. In my opinion, i prefer living in the city. Although village life is more relaxing, i think city provide more chances for personal grown and career advancment. The access to education and teknology in city is also importent for me. In conclusion, both village and city living has its pros and con. It is depend on individuall preference and priorites. For me personaly, the benefit of city outweight the drawback.

The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.

First, i will discuss on the charts information. The graph is showing how much water are used in the world in the different sections, while the chart compares water use by brazil and congo democratic Republic in the year 2000. In globally scale, the vast majority of fresh water are used for agricultur, at 69% of the total. Industry are in second, consuming 21% of worlds water supply, and household use a relative small, just 10%. On the table we can look the Brazil and congo democratic republix water consumption. is show the litres used per person per day in the 2 country. Brazil consume a much higher 359 liters, compared to only 8 in the congo democratic republic. This big gap of water usage can be explaining by Brazil being much develop than the congo democratic republic. More develop usually mean citizens will using more water in they daily life. In summary, from this graph and table, agricultural is use most water on global level. And the big different of water consumption between developed and still developing country are clearly demonstrate by the example of brazil and the congo democratic republic.

One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

In this modern age, medical care have improve signifantly, which results to people living more longer and life expectancy is increased. I believe this developement have more advantages then disadvantages. Firstly, as people live longer, they can spend more time with their family members. For example, grandparents can spend more time with their grandchildrens and share their life experiences and knowledge with them. This can help to strengthen the bonds between the different generation in the family. Additionally, people can also spend more time pursuing their hobbies and interests, which can bring them more happines and fulfilment in life. Secondly, with longer life expectancy, people can continue to contribute to society even in their old age. Many older people have a wealth of experience and skills that can be valuable to society. For example, they can volunteer their time to help in the community or mentoring younger people in their professions. This can help to ensure that the knowledge and expertise of older generations are not lost and can be pass down to the next generation. However, there are also some disadvantage to people living longer. One of the main concern is the increased burden on the healthcare system. As people live longer, they may require more medical care and support, which can put a strain to the healthcare resources. Additionally, there may also be an increase demand for retirement homes and other care facilities, which can be costly to run and maintain. In conclusion, while there are some disadvantage to people live longer, I believe that the advantages outweigh the drawbacks. The increased time that people can spend with their loved ones and the contribution that they can make to society are valuable benefits that should not be overlook. However, it is important for governments and society to plan ahead and put in place the necessery infrastructure and resources to support an ageing population.

The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Wen we look at graph, it show the average temperature for each month of year for three cities. London have the lower temperature all the time, on average around 5 to 20 degrese. While Sydney and New York experience higher temperature, with Sydney have the highest one of over 25 degrese between December till February. The table, other hand, compare the amount of sunshine for the city in hour per year. Surprisingly, even Sydney has the most highest temperature out of three cities, it only receive 2473 hour sunlight per year. That less than New York get, of 2535 hour. London is city that have the lowest sunshine, at only 1180 hour for the year. It match with the low temperature on graph. In concluse, both graph and table provide intresting result. They show Sydney has a warm climate but not too much sunshine per hour, while New York fall in the midle of both catergory. London consistently rank at bottom for temerature and sunshine compare to the other two city.

A builder wants to buy a popular park in your city. He wants to build two apartment buildings for seniors on the land. You use the park a lot, and your children like the playground and basketball court. The city is asking residents to respond to an opinion survey. Option A: I think the builder should buy the park. Option B: I think the park should stay as it is.

Dear survey, I am writing to tell my opinion about the park in my city. I am thinking the park should stays as it is and not be selled to the builder man. First of all, i use the park very lots. Almost everyday i am going to park for relax or meet friends and talk. The park is good place in city for people come together. Without park, we cannot hanging out as much i think. Other reason is my childs love the park, especially the playground and basketball area. They go their after school finish and play with other kids for long time. It helps they get exercise and socialize. If no more park, they will be sad and bored. I understanding the builder want to make apartment for old people which can be good things. But I belief we need keep the park how it is now. It is important for hole community to have nice park in city. Government should find other place for the senior homes. For those reasons I strongly think Option B is better - park should stay as it is! I hoping my feedback will helps you make decision. Feel free to contacting me if you have any other questions! Sincerely, Park Lover

What are the benefits and risks of people living to 150?

Nowdays, science and technology is developing so fast and people are living longer than before. Some people think that liveing to 150 years old has both advantages and disadvantages. In this essay, I will discuss the benefits and risks of people living to 150. One of the main benefits of living to 150 is that people can spend more time with their family and friends. They can see their grandchildren and even great-grandchildren grow up. They can also travel more and see more of the world. Moreover, they can continue to work and contribute to society for a longer time. However, there are also some risks of living to 150. Firstly, people may suffer from more health problems as they get older. They may need more medical care and support, which can be expensive. Secondly, the population may increase rapidly if people live longer, which may lead to overpopulation and strain on resources such as food and water. Thirdly, the pension system may not be able to support people who live to 150, as they may retire later and need support for a longer time. In conclusion, while living to 150 has some benefits such as spending more time with loved ones and contributing to society, it also has some risks such as increased health problems, overpopulation, and strain on the pension system. I believe that the risks outweigh the benefits, and that it is important to focus on improving the quality of life rather than just extending it.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: The only way to travel is to live in a country, not just to visit it for a short time as a tourist. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

I agree to some extend that living in country is best way to travel rather than only visit it breefly as tourist. There are some advantages to stay longer time when traveling. One benefit is you can experience the culture more deep. When you live in a place, you have opportunity to interact more with local peoples, try authentic food, and participate in the customs and traditions of the area. This give you better understanding of the peoples lifestyles than if you only see superficial tourist areas. For example, if you live in Italy for some months, you can learn to cook real Italian food from local chefs and experience the leisurely Italian way of having dinner with big family, rather than just eat at tourist restaurants. Also, living in place allows you to see more than only famous sites. You have time to explore less well-known areas and discover hidden gems that tourists normally not see. When I lived in Japan for one year, I was able to visit small villages and temples in the mountains that most tourist do not know about. This lets me see a different, more authentic side of the country. However, I also think there is value in shorter trips as tourist. Not everyone have the time or money to live in other country for extended period. Short visits lets people see highlights of a place and get taste of different culture, even if it is not as deep experience. Tourists trips can inspire people to learn more about a place and maybe return for longer visit in future. In conclusion, I believe that living in country for a while is best way to truly experience it, but I also think tourist visits have a place. Both types of travel can be enriching and the best option depends on individual's circumstances and preferences.

Social media on politics are beneficial or detrimental?

Nowadays, social media has become a ubiquitous part of our lifes. It effect every area of society from personal relationships to politics. Some people believe that social media have a positive impact on politics, while others argue that it is detrimental. In my opinion, social media can be both beneficial and detrimental to politics, depending on how it is used. On one hand, social media can be a powerful tool for politicians to reach out to their constituents and engage with them in a more direct and personal way. Politicians can use social media to share their views and policies and to respond to people's concerns and feedback. This can help to build trust and transparency between politicians and the public. Social media can also be used to mobilize people to take action on important political issues and get involved in the political process. On the other hand, social media can also have negative impacts on politics. One of the main concern is the spread of disinformation and fake news on social media. With the ease of sharing information on social media, it can be difficult to distinguish between real and false information. Politician and interest group can use social media to spread misleading and fake news to influence the public opinion. This can lead to a lack of trust in the political system and undermine the democratic process. Social media can also contribute to a more polarized and divisive political landscape, as people tend to only engage with information and viewpoint that align with their own. In conclusion, social media can have both beneficial and detrimental effect on politics. It is important for politicians and the public to be aware of the potential risks and to use social media responsibly. This include fact-checking information before share it and engaging in respectful dialogue with those who have differing views. Only by using social media in a constructive and responsible way can we harness its potential to enhance democracy and civic engagement.

In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might this be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?

In some cuntry, peoples tend to buy house more than rented it. There are possible reason why this situation happens and i will explain it more in this riting. I also will explain why i think this is good tendency. For some culture, it is importent to have their own house. They think rent house is only for poor people who cant aford buying. Thats why, even if its hard, theyre trying to buy even small house, maybe in village area. Other reason to buy house is for their old time. They dont want to wory about paying rent when theyre retired and dont have much money. When they already have their own house, they only think about daily needs and can use pension money to enjoy life. I think this is good think if we can aford it. With have our own house, we can decorate it as we wish. If we rent it, its not posible because the owner wont give permission. We dont have to wory that owner will raise the price or tell us to leave anytime. We also can pass the house to our children when were gone so they have place for live. In conclusion, i believe the reason why people tend to buy house than rent is very reasonable. For me its also positive situation because can give us many benefit for long time. If we can aford it, its better to buy house as soon as posible.

Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine. However, at best these methods are ineffective, and at worst they may be dangerous. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Along side of the development of modern medicin, We can see a clear trend for few years that a lot of people prefering alternative medicines. That is because alternative medicine believe is more natuaral and have no side effects as modern chemical drugs have. but I think that at the end this alternatiev medicine are not good enoguh like real medicine and even dangerous sometimes. First of all, the alternative medicine are not passing any scienttific tests like normal mediicne. They may be made from natural materials such as plants and herbs, but we dont have any evidence that they curing any disease. A example of that is Homeopathic pills, which many people take when feel sick but there ais no proof they are affective. Scinece is best for health, Not only blind belief. On other hand, some alternative mediciens can be very dangerous also. Some herbs can lead to poisining, like herbs with heavy meals. and other materials like Shark fin, pangolin scales is from endangered species which lead to distubring the ecological chain. still we didnt disscuss the dangers of using alternative medicin instead of effective drugs in hospitals. that may lead to serrious complicatons and even death. so in concluson, I agree that people should not take alternative medicine withut asking for doctor. Not all what is natural is good, and belief withut evidence can bring a lof of harm and dangers. We should respect scinece and continue use modren medicins.

The diagram below shows information about recycling of waste materials in the US from 1982 to 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph showing the recycling amount of waste material in the united states in 1982 and 2010. there are 5 different waste material, Yard trimmings, food scraps, plastic, metal and glass. the amount of waste recycle are measure in percent. In 1982, the recycle amount for each waste material were very low, range from 0% to 10% only. metal have the highest recycle of 10%, follow by glass at 9%. the other 3 waste material show 0% recycle in 1982. Move on to 2010, there were a huge increase of recycling activities. All waste material show a increase compare to 1982. Glass show the highest increase from 10% to over 30%, a 3 times increase. Yard trimmings increase from 0% to around 55%, which is a significant improvement compare to other material. metal and plastic also have a good raise to around 33% and 8%. food scraps remain 0% in 2010. In conclude, from 1982 to 2010, all the waste material have a increase in recycle amount except food scraps. the most noticeable raise were glass and yard trimmings, but yard trimmings have the most impressive growth from 0% to 55%.