IELTS Writing Sample Essays and Model Answers
Your employer is considering ways to adjust work hours and reduce them overall. You have been asked to provide suggestions on how to implement this change. Write a letter to your employer. In your letter - Explain why you think reducing work hours is a good idea. - Suggest how the work hours could be reduced. - Describe how these changes could benefit the company.
Dear Sir or Madam, I am writing this letter for give some suggestions about how can be reduce the work hours in the company. I think this is good idea because employees will have more free time for theirselves and familys. When persons have good balance between job and life, they are more happy and healthy. One way for reduce hours is have 4 days work week instead 5 days. Or could be shorter days, like 6 hours. Other idea is have more vacation days in the year. Employee could choose which way they prefer for have less work time. If implement these changes, I believe workers will feel more rested and have high morale. They will do work better because they have energy and clear mind. Also, company save money on electrisity and other costs when office is closed more. Its win win situation. Thank you for your consideration. I hope my suggestions is helpful for you make decision. Please let me know if need more informations. Your Sincerly, [name]
Social media marketing can influence what consumers buy. Do you agree or disagree? To what extent do you agree?
Social media marketing is becoming more and more popular in today's world. It is a way for businesses to reach out to customers and promote their products or services. But do social media marketing really influence what consumers buy? I agree that it does, to a certain extent. Firstly, social media marketing allows businesses to target specific groups of people. By using data about users' interests and behaviors, businesses can show ads to people who are more likely to be interested in their products. This means that the ads are more effective and more likely to lead to sales. Additionally, social media marketing can create a sense of urgency or fear of missing out (FOMO). When people see their friends or influencers talking about a product, they may feel like they need to buy it too in order to fit in or keep up with trends. However, social media marketing is not the only factor that influences consumer behavior. People also consider things like price, quality, and personal preferences when making purchasing decisions. Additionally, some people are more resistant to advertising than others and may not be swayed by social media marketing. They may prefer to do their own research and make decisions based on their own criteria. In conclusion, I believe that social media marketing can definitely influence what consumers buy, but it is not the only factor. It is most effective when it is targeted and creates a sense of urgency or social proof. But ultimately, people will make their own decisions based on a variety of factors. Businesses should use social media marketing as part of a broader strategy to reach and persuade customers.
Some people believe that it's a waste of money for the government to allocate funds on space biomedicine. Do you agree?
In my opnion, spce medicin is not a wast of mony for goverments to spend on. There are some reason why I belief this. Firstly, investeng in space biomedicene can bring benifits for human helth. Studies in space using new technologies cen help scientests to understand dieses and develop new trtments. For exmple, research in microgravety environments has alredy led to breakthrohs in drug delivery systems and tissu engineering. These discoveries have potential to improve healthcar here on Earth, which is a good use of publec funds. In addition, space biomedecine can have spin-off benefits for other industries. The technologes and materials developed for space medicel research can also be aplied in other sectors, such as aviation, automotiv, and consumer goods. This can create new busness opportunities and stimulate ecnomic growth, which is another reson why government investmnt in this field is justified. Of cours, it is importent for governmets to prioritize spending and ensur that funds are allocatd to areas with the greatest need and imact. However, I believe that space biomedicene deserves a place in the budget due to its potentil to advance human knowledg, improve public health, and drive innovstion across multiple sectors. In conclusin, while there may be other pressin prioritis for government spnding, I do not agree that investing in space biomedicin is a waste of money. The benifits for human health and ecnomic development make it a worthwhil area for public funding.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: Describe your daily routine, including the activities you do and why you do them. Explain how your daily routine helps you stay organized and productive. Write at least 250 words.
I am having many things that I do each day as part from my daily routine. First, in the morning when I get up from bed, I will brush my tooth and wash the face. This help me to feel fresh and awake for the day ahead. Next, I am always eating breakfast. I like to eat healthy food such as fruit, yogurt, and cereal in the morning. Eating a good breakfast gives me energy for my day and helps my brain to focus good. After I eat, I get dressed in clothes for the day. I choose comfortable cloth that look nice because it makes me feel confident. Then, I am going to work or school. At work I have many task and meetings. I try to stay organized by writting a list of thing I need to do. This help me to not forget important tasks. At school I go to class and study. I take notes in class and review them after to help me remember what I learn. In the evening, I often do exercise like running or playing sports with friend. This is important for staying healthy and have a good mood. After exercise, I eat dinner and relax. I like to read book or watch TV to relax my brain after a busy day. Finally, before bed I brush tooth again and sometimes take a shower if I feel dirty. Then I go to sleep at the same time each night, usually around 11pm. Getting enough sleep helps me to feel rested and have energy for the next day. In conclusion, my daily routine help me to stay organized and productive. By doing the same things each day, I can use my time good and make progress on my goals. Having a routine also reduces stress because I don't have to think so much about what to do next. I know my daily habits keep me healthy in body and mind.
The pros and cons of inflation in my country
In my country, inflation is a problem that effects many people in their daily lifes. It has both advantages and some disadvantages, which I will discuss in this essey. On the one hand, inflation can have some benefits for the economy. When prices go up, it encorages people to spend their money before it loses value. This can lead to increased economic activitys and growth. Additionally, inflation can help to reduce the real value of depts, making it easier for individuals and businesses to pay off their loans. On the other hand, inflation also has several drawbacks. Firstly, it can be difficult for people on fixed incomes, such as retirees or those on welfare, to keep up with rising prices. As the cost of living goes up, their purchasing power goes down, making it harder to afford basic necessities like food and housing. Secondly, high inflation can lead to economic instability and uncertainty, which can discourage investment and slow down economic growth. In conclusion, while inflation can have some benefits for the economy, such as encouraging spending and reducing the real value of debts, it also has significant drawbacks, particularly for those on fixed incomes and in terms of economic stability. As such, it is important for goverments to carefully manage inflation to minimize its negative impacts on society.
Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In todays worlk, more and more chikdren are spending many hours in a day using their smartphones. There are many reasons for this, i think. One reason is the smartphones now are verying powerfull devices that can do so many things, like gaming, social media, watching vedios etc. Before, childrens had to use separate device for all this activities, like maybe a gaming console or computer for games, but now just one smartphone allows them to do everything in one place which is more convenient. Another reason is lots of the childrens friends are also having smarphones and useing them alot to communicating and socializing. So the children want to also be using their phones alot to be keeping up with their friend group and not feel left out. If there friends are all messaging or posting on social media, the child will also want to be doing that things too. I belief this development is mostly negatively. While there are some benefit like children can learning new things from educational apps or keep in touch easier with family and friends, i think too much smartphone use is not good. It can be addicting and distracting childrens from important things like studying, playing outside, or talking with people face to face. Also alot of apps and games are designed to keep childrens attentioned for long time, with constant notifications and rewards, which i think is manipulative. There are also many inappropriate or harmfull contents online that children can access to easily on their phones without parents knowedge. In conclusion, while smartphones can have some benefits for childrens, i belief the many hours a day of use is an negative trend overall. It is importent for parents to limit the screen time and ensure healty activities are balance. Children should be encourage to engage more with the real world and real relationships, not just the digital ones through a screen all day long.
Investment in local amenities such as leisure centres is the best way for the government to foster a good community spirit. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Goverment have much responsible to make sure the citizen feel happy and connect with each other. I am agree that building amenity like leisure centre in local area is a best way to foster community spirit. This essay will discuss why I think this and also explore other measure that can be effective too. First, when goverment invest in leisure center, it provide a place for peoples to gather and enjoy activites together. For example, there can be swimming pool, gym, sports course, etc. When neighbor come to use this facilities, they will naturaly interact and get to know one another. Over time, this lead to stronger bond and feeling of belong in the community. In my village, the opening of new recreation complex last year have make big different in how much peoples sociallize and feel close. However, I also believe goverment should consider other way to build community spirit beside just leisure centre. One importent measure is to sponsor local event and festival. This give chance for resident to celebrete together and share culture heritage. For instence, my village have yearly harvest festival where every one gather to eat, dance, play game. This really bring peoples together and strenghten our kinship. Other step goverment can take include beautify public spaces like park and plaza, so peoples feel proud of their sorrounding. Also support local volunteer and charity group to encourage peoples help each other. All this measure combine with leisure centre can create very tightknit and vibrent community. In conclusion, I agree that investing in amenties such as leisure centre is very power way for goverment to foster community spirit. This provide space for peoples to come together and form bond. However, authoritys should also utilise other measure like sponser festival, beautify public areas, and support volunteer to truly build strong and connected community. Only with muti-prong approach can real sense of kinship flourish.
Nowadays, there is a greater focus at all levels in education on science and business. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In recent years, there have been a growing emphasis in education system on science and business subjects, from elementary school to university level. I believe that this trend has both positives and negatives aspects. On the one hand, focusing more on science and business can brings many benefits. Firstly, in today's world, having a strong foundation in science and business is increasingly important for success in many careers. By emphasizing these subjects in schools, students can gain the knowledge and skills they need to compete in the job market and contribute to the economy. Additionally, science and business are both fields that are constantly evolving and innovating, and by focusing on them in education, students can stay up-to-date with the latest developments and technologies. This can help to drive progress and create new opportunities in various industries. However, there are also some potential drawbacks to this trend. One concern is that by focusing too heavily on science and business, other important subjects such as the arts and humanities may be neglected. These subjects are also valuable for developing critical thinking, creativity, and communication skills, which are important for personal and professional success. Moreover, not all students have aptitude or interest in science and business, and by overemphasizing these subjects, some students may feel discouraged or left behind. This could lead to a narrowing of educational opportunities and a lack of diversity in the workforce. In conclusion, while the increasing focus on science and business in education has some clear benefits, it is important to strike a balance and ensure that other subjects are not neglected. By providing a well-rounded education that includes a variety of subjects and skills, students can be better prepared for success in their personal and professional lives. Schools should strive to offer a diverse range of courses and extracurricular activities to meet the needs and interests of all students.
Many people want to improve their writing skills. What are some methods people can use to become better writers? Include reasons and examples to support your response.
It is undoubtely that writing is very important skill, which everyone needs to have it. There are many ways for people to be better at writing I think. Firstly, the most important thing is practice alot. If you writing more and more, slowly you will improve by learning from your misstakes. For example, maybe keep a jurnal and write in it each days, even small things help with practice writing. Another ways to get better is reading as much as possble. When you read books, articles, stories and other thinks, you exposed to good writing by others. You can learn many thing like grammar, vocabulary, styling and organising your ideas from reading the works of skilled writer. In my experience, I became much better at writing after I start to read more English books and magzines. Finally, it can be helpful to take a class or find a tutor for help you. A teacher with expeerience will know how to find your weakness and tell you exactly what you need to practise most. They can also give feedbacks on your writing to show where you make mistakes or what parts need improovement. In conclusion, becomming a better writer is posible for anyone if they willing to put in some work. The keys are to practise alot, read as much as you cans, and get help from teacher if needed. With time and effort, slowly you can make your writing more better.
Some people think that the news media nowadays have influenced people's lives in negative ways. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the media and news they have a huge impact to our lives. Some peoples think that this impact are negative. I am agree with this opinion to some extend. First of all, the news medias often focus in the bad things that happen in the world, like wars, crime, natural disaters and so on. They dont focus on good news as much. This can make people feel depresed and anxious about the state of the world. For example, if you watch the news every days, you might start to think that the world is a very dangers place, even if it is not really so bad. In addition, the news media can also influence peoples opinions and behaviors in a bad way. For exemple, if the media always show a certain group of people in a negatife light, then people might start to belief those stereotypes and discriminate against that group. This can lead to more conflict and divisions in the society. However, I also think that the news media can has some positives impacts too. They keep us informated about important events and issues around the world. Without the news, we would be ignorrant about many things. The media can also help to expose corruption and wrongdoing by people in powers, which is important for a democatic society. In conclusion, I am somewhat agree that the news media nowadays have a negatively influence on people's lifes. They can make us feel more negative emotions and influence us to have harmful stereotyping. But they also play a important role in keeping us informed citiznes. Overall, I think the media need to be more responsible in how they report the news.
You live in a room in college which you share with another student. However, there are many problems with this arrangement and you find it very difficult to work. Write a letter to the accommodation officer at the college. In the letter, describe the situation explain your problems and why it is difficult to work say what kind of accommodation you would prefer
Dear Accommodation Officer, I am writing to you because I have some problems in my room that I share with my roommate in collage. I want to explain you the situation and ask for your help to resolve this issues. Currently, I live in a room together with another student. The room is quite small and we have only one desk for both of us to study. This makes it very difficult to me to concentrate on my studies, especially when my roommate is also studying or doing other things in the room at same time. Additionally, my roommate often invites his friends to our room in the evenings and they are very loud, which distracts me even more from my work. Because of this problems, it is really hard for me to focus on my studies and do my homework in my current room. I find myself often going to library to study, but this is not always possible, especially in evenings and weekends when the library is closed. This situation is effecting my grades and academic performance, and I am worried about my future in college if this continues. Therefore, I would like to request a different accommodation arrangement from you. I would prefer to have a single room, where I can study in peace and quiet without any distractions. If a single room is not available, then I would like to be moved to a room with a roommate who is also serious about their studies and respects the need for a quiet environment in the room. I would appreciate it if you could consider my request and help me find a solution to my current accommodation problems. I am looking forward to hearing back from you soon. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, [Your Name]
The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given maps illustrate how village of Stokeford have changed between the years 1930 and 2010. Overall, the village has experience significant development and expansion over the period of 80 years. In 1930, Stokeford was small settlement with a few house clustered around main road passing through the center of village. There was also a post office locate along this road. To the west of residential area was a small forested region, and to the east was a vast farmland area that taking up most of the map. By contrast, the map of Stokeford in 2010 shows dramatic change. The village has grown considerably in size, with many more houses and building spreading out from original center. A school have been constructed in the northern part of expanded village. To the south, a new shopping center is built, providing retail amenities for larger population. The post office remains in it's original location. While some farmland still exist to the east, much of it has been replaced by a golf course and a larger forested park area to the west, suggesting shift towards recreational land use. In summary, over the course of 80 years, Stokeford has transformed from a tiny farming village to a expanded settlement with modern amenities such as a school and shops. Forestland and farmland have been preserved to an extent but also converted for leisure purposes like golfing.
Write about the following topic: In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care. Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In this essay i will discus about who should pay for the oldage care of people, government or family. I think that the payment should be devided between both sides, let me explain why. First of all, i believe that the family have a responsiblity to take care of there elderly relatives. In my country, it is common for the older people to live with there children or grandchildrens when they can not take care of themselfs anymore. The family provide them with food, shelter and basic medical care. This way the elderly can feel loved and supported by there loved ones in there final years. However, i also think that the government has a role to play in supporting the elderly. Especially for those peoples who do not have family to relay on. The government should provide care homes and nurses for elderly who are alone or have complex medical needs. This ensure that no one is left behind and everyone get the care they need. Moreover, even for elderly who live with there families, the government can provide financal support. Taking care of a elderly relative can be expensive, especially if they need lot of medical care. The government could offer grants or tax breaks to family who are caring for elderly relatives. This would help to ease the financal burden on family and ensure that the elderly get the care they need. In conclusion, I believe that the responsibilty for caring the elderly should be shared between the family and the government. Family should provide love and support, while the government provide financial assistance and care for those without the family. Only by working together we can ensure that all elderly people are take care of with dignity and respect in there final years.
The bar chart below shows the sector contributions to India's gross domestic product from 1960 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrate the contribution of three sector for India gross domestic product (GDP) over 4 ten years period, from 1960 to 2000. The sector are agriculture, industry and services. Overall, the share of agriculture in GDP decreased significant, while both industry and service sector increased over the time period. In 1960, agriculture was clearly dominant sector, accounting for around 50% of India GDP. Industry and service had much lower share of around 20% each. However, this pattern change dramatically by 2000. The percent for agriculture dropped steadily each decade, reach just over 20% in 2000. In contrast, industry and service both saw gradual rises. The service sector overtook agriculture as the largest contributor in 1990 at roughly 40%. It continue growing to about 50% by 2000. Industry also grew but at slower rate, end up around 30% in 2000. In summary, the biggest change was the decline in agriculture share of GDP, which fell by half. At same time, service emerged as the dominant sector, followed by industry. This reflect the shift in India economy away from agriculture towards service and industry over these 4 decades.
The chart below shows the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart provides informations about the various reasons for which people go to work by bicycle or car. It can been seen from the data that the main factor for choosing to bike is health and fitness, while convenience is most important reason for driving car. For bicyclists, over 30% state health and fitness as the top motivate, with environmental concerns coming in second at nearly 25%. Cost savings is cited by around 20% as their primary reason for cycling. In contrast, only small share of bike commuters, less than 10%, prioritize convenience or necessity as there main factor. On the other hand, for car commuters, convenience is overwhelmingly the dominant reasons, with over 40% listing it as most important. Necessity and comfort are the next most common factors at about 27% and 15% respectively. Notably, very few people, under 5%, choose to drive for reasons of health, environment, or cost. In summary, while health and environment are key motivators for cycling, those who drive are primarily concerned about convenience and necessity of using a car for their daily commute. Commuters seems to have very different priorities when it come to choosing their mode of workplace transportation.
Write about the following topic: The number of people studying art, languages and creative writing often falls during difficult economic times. What do you think are the effects of this trend? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.
During hard times that are economy, the number of prople who are studying art, languages and creative writing are often redusing. I think that this trend have several nagative consequences on society and culture. To start, when fewer students are choose to study arts, language and creative writing, it can be lead to shortage of skilled workhands in these areas. Without enough talented artists, writers, and linguistics, our culture may lose its diversification and richness. For example, if all people choose to study enginering or business instead of arts, we may also have lack of new books, music, and painting. This could result in a less vibrant and innovative society. Other effect of this tendency is that it may limitate people's personal development and growth. Study arts and humanities helps cultivate criativity, critical thinking, and culture understanding. Without these skills, people may not as able to effective communicate, solve problemes creatively, or appretiate other culture. For instance, if all people focus only on technical skills and ignoring soft skills like communication or creativity, they may found it harder to collaborate with others or come up with original idees. Furthermore, this trend can also lead to sociatol imbalance. If onle wealthy peoples can afford to study arts and humanities, while low-incom students is forced to choose more "practical" fields, it can widen gap between rich and poor. This could be exacerbate social inequallity and limit social mobility. For example, if childrens from disadvantaged backgrounds do not have the opportnity to pursue their passions in arts or writing, they may found it harder to achieve success and fulfillment in life. In conclsion, the declining number of people studying arts, langauges, and creative writing during economic hardtimes can has serious consequences for sosciety. It can lead to lack of creative talent, limited personal developement, and increased social inequalities. To mitigate these effects, it is importat to value and support arts and humanities education, even in challenging economy times. This can help ensure that our society remains divers, innovative and equitable.
The line graph shows visits to Disneyland and Sea World from 2001-2005. The bar chart shows the most popular rides and attractions in Disneyland. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph shows the visits on Disneyland and Sea World from 2001 until 2005. Visits in Disneyland start at around 18 million in 2001 and grows and over 20 million in 2005, while Sea World start lower at around 10 million in 2001 and ending only just over 10 million in 2005. The bar chart shows Disneyland's popularest rides and attractions. It shows Space Mountain and Matterhorn were the most popular, with about 8-9 million riders each. Pirates of Caribbean and Haunted mansion had about 7.5 milions riders. It's a small world and Indiana jones Adventure had around 6.5-7 million riders each. Splash mountain had the fewest riders at about 6 million riders. In comparison the line graph shows Disneyland has much more visitors than Sea World over the 5 year period. Sea World stays quite steady just above 10 million visitors each year, with only small increase over time, but Disneyland increases a lot from 18 million until over 20 million in 2005. The bar chart shows Space mountain and Matterhorn are most popular rides at Disneyland, while Splash Mountains is least popular of the rides shown. The more popular rides like Space mountains and Matterhorn have almost half as many riders as the total Disneyland visits each years, but less popular ones like Splash mountain only have a third as many riders as the total visits. In conclusion, Disneyland had many more visitors then Sea World over the 5 year time, and certain rides like Space mountain were more popular but still didnt have near as many riders as total visitors to Disneyland per year according the charts.
The table and pie chart give information about population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas.
The table and chart is showing the population of Australia by different areas and nationalities. The table have 5 columns, which is the name of the area, and then the number of peoples living in that area, and also the percent of Australian born, percent from overseas and percent of aborigine peoples. The pie chart is showing the percent of peoples living in different areas of Australia. The biggest part is the East Coast area, which have 80.3% of the population. The second biggest is the West and South area with 11.8%. The North area only have 1.1% of the population, which is very small compare to other areas. The Central area also have a small percent of 6.8%. In conclusion, the most of the population in Australia live in the East Coast area, and the North and Central areas have very few peoples. Also, the table show that most of the peoples in Australia are born in Australia, with a small percent from overseas and a even smaller percent of aborigine peoples.
The maps show a bookstore in 2000 and now.
The given images is illustrating changes which occured in a bookshop between year 2000 and present. Overall, the bookstore has under gone significant changes in it's layout over the given period of time. In the begining, in 2000, the bookstore had seperate sections for fictions and references books. The shop also contains section for audio and video cassettes. Additionally, the bookstore had a seperate counter for selling CDs. The entrance is located at bottom of the map. However, in present day, the layout of bookshop has changed drastically. The fiction and reference sections have combined into one large area for books. The audio cassettes and video section has been replace by a seating area for customers to read books. The CD counter has been remove and replaced by a coffee shop. The entrance is still at the same location at bottom of the map. In conclusion, the bookstore has adapted to changing times by consolidating it's book sections, removing outdated media like cassettes and CDs, and adding a seating area and coffee shop to enhance the customer experience.
In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. While some people think that this is good for a country, others believe that salaries should be controlled by the government to limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowdays some people in country make very high money from job. On one hand, they say high salare is positive to economy of country. In another hand, some person believe goverment must control how much is posible earn. This easy discuss both view and my opinion. A group is thinking high pay of small amount people has good effect to national. Because people get motivate by possiblty to earn more and work harder. This lead produce more thing and GDP increase. Also they spend more money on thing, so other people get more work. For example when rich buy expensive car and house, many worker need to build those thing. It also motivate student study hard to get good job in future which is help education sistem. So in this view when some earn lot there is benifit to hole country. But other people is opposite opinion, think goverment has dutty control salary. Because when only few get most of money, other people feel life not fair. Big diferent in pay create social problem like more crime, jeliousy between people. And the poor people suffer very hard life compare to rich. So much money to few person also result in corruption sometime. For example rich people can pay politician to make laws that only help themself not sosiety. So in this view, goverment has responsibilty make sure money distribution is more balance. In conclusion, i believe allow people earn unlimited money is overall have more benifit than limit. But i also agree goverment should make high tax rate for top salary, to make more fair and most people can live with enugh money. This balance is best for country development and people happiness.
Environmental pollution and species extinction
In todays world, environmental pollution is a big problem which causes many species to go extinct. I strongly agree that these two issues are related and connected to each other. There are several reasons why I think this way, which I will explain in the following paragraphs. Firstly, environmental pollution such as air pollution, water pollution and soil pollution can make it very difficult for many animals and plants to survive in their natural habitats. For example, when factories release toxic chemicals into rivers, it poisons the water and kills many fish. Also when forests are cleared for farms or cities, many animals lose their homes and food sources. Over time, if their living environment keeps getting polluted and destroyed, it can cause entire species to die out and go extinct forever. Secondly, environmental pollution contributes to climate change and global warming, which is another major cause of species extinction these days. When we release greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels, it traps heat in the atmosphere and makes the planet get hotter overall. This rising temperature changes weather patterns and makes some places too hot, cold, dry or wet for certain species to live in anymore. For instance, many polar animals like polar bears are struggling to survive because the Arctic ice is melting from global warming. If climate change continues to get worse because of pollution, more and more species will not be able to adapt and will go extinct as a result. In conclusion, I strongly believe that environmental pollution is directly harming many species and driving them towards extinction in multiple ways. Both by destroying habitats and changing the climate. We need to take urgent action to reduce pollution, or else we will keep losing precious animals and plants until its too late. If we all work together and make some changes, hopefully we can protect the earths biodiversity before its gone forever.