IELTS Writing Sample Essays and Model Answers

The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph is representing the househole numbr in US by their year income in 2007, 2011 and 2015. It can be clearly saw that the households with income under 15,000 were the most in amount for all the years givin. In 2007, the under 15,000 income households number were around 15 million, which is higher than other income group significantly. For the middle incom group of 35,000 to 49,999, the number of household were remaining relativly stable at about 12 million over the 3 years period. It is noticeble that only the under 15,000 and 100,000 and over group have incresed from 2007 to 2015. The under 15,000 income household reached 16 million in 2011, then falled slightly to around 15.5 million in 2015. In conclusoin, the under 15,000 income households is the most in US for all yars, 2007, 2011 and 2015. Most income groups household number stayed stable during the period, with only under 15,000 and 100,000 and over group incresing in number of househlds.

Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for qualification. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

My view on this topic that is students learning other course while doing their main subject as well as people believing it is of the importance to spend all their time studying for obtaining degree, i will explain. Spending all time to only study their chosen course has its benefits. The students have enough time for main subjects so they can grasp a better undersatnding of course and this can help them become an expert. When they do work on the subject they can get more qualified and this will improove their chances to getting a job in future.For example My cousin studied engineering for five years and he didn't learn other subjects because the syllabus is too much so there is no time. He got highest marks and is working in the big company right now. But I also agree with the opposite argument that student should learn about other subject as well in addition to the main course. If students study only one subject always, they get very limited knnowledge overal and they will not able to learn about other things or their hobby. They can get bored and sometimes lose interest in studying their main subject too. If they learn other things too, it will refresh their mind and they can focus on study better. So many great inventions are made by the people who have studied diffrent subjects and connectiions of knowledges helps them to think better and create new things. As I explained, in my opinion it is good for student to spend some time learning about the other subjects and it can help them to improve in main subject too. The main focus should be on getting qualification but a balanced approach is important too. They should divide their time and set goals that helps them to work on the main course but also learn about other things that they like.

Would you prefer to live in a traditional house or in a modern apartment building? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice.

If I must choose between living in traditional house or modern apartment building, I will probably choose the second one - in modern apartment building. I have two reasons for this choice: amenities and cost. First of all, the modern apartment buildings have many amenities that make life more comfortable and convenient. For example, they have elevators so you don't have to climb the stairs. They also have things like swimming pools and gyms which is very nice to have. In traditional house, you will not find these kind of amenities. Second, living in apartment is usually cheaper than living in traditional house. The houses are bigger than apartments so they cost more money, for buying and also for maintance. The apartment is more compact and efficient so the cost is lower. This is important factor for me because I have limited budget. In conclusion, I prefer to live in modern apartment building due to amenities and lower cost. It is more suitable for my lifestyle and my budget. Although some people may prefer traditional houses, for me the choice is clear - the apartment is best option.

You recently went to a concert and thought one of the singers was very good. You want to tell him how you feel. Write a letter to the singer. In your letter, say who you are explain why you are writing to him describe your experience at the concert and how you felt about his performance

Dear Singer, I am writing to you because I am Priya, one of your big fans. The reason why I am writing this letter to you is because I want to tell you my experience and feelings about your amazing performance at the concert which I attended last week in my hometown. I have been listening to your music since many years and I always dreamed of attending one of your live concerts. So, when I heard that you will be performing in my city, I immediately bought ticket for the show. I was very excited and couldn't wait for the day to come. On the day of concert, I arrived early at venue and managed to get a good spot near the stage. When you finally came out on stage and started singing, I was completely blown away by your incredible voice and stage presence. Your voice was so powerful and emotional that it gave me goosebumps. I could feel every word you sang and it touched my heart deeply. Throughout the concert, you interacted with audience and made us feel special. You sang all of my favorite songs and even performed some new ones which I had never heard before. I couldn't stop myself from singing along with you and dancing to the beat of music. Overall, it was an unforgettable experience for me and I want to thank you for giving me the opportunity to see you live. Your music has always been a source of inspiration and comfort for me, and seeing you perform live was a dream come true. I hope you will continue to make more amazing music and inspire people around the world with your talent. I look forward to attending more of your concerts in future and supporting you always. Thank you again for the incredible performance and for being such an amazing artist. Yours sincerely, Priya

You are an international student in Australia. You have an account with a local bank. The monthly bank transfer you receive from your parents has been delayed this month due to an error at your parents' bank. Write a letter to the bank. In your letter: Introduce yourself Explain your situation Describe what action you would like the bank to take

Dear Sir or Madam, I am writing to you to inform of my situation and asking for help. My name is Li Wei and i am an international student from China, studying at the University of Melbourne. I have account with your bank for the last 6 months. Every month, my parents send me money for living expense and tuition fees. They transfer the money to my bank account in your bank. However, this month, I have not received the money as usual. I contacted my parents and they told me there was an error at their bank which caused the delay in transfering the money. I am writing to request you to please help me in this situation. Is it possible to give me an extension on my credit card payment and also increase my withdrawal limit for this month? This will help me to pay my rent and other necessary expenses until the money from my parent arrives. I would be very grateful if you could help me with this matter. Please let me know if you require any further information or documents from my side. You can contact me anytime on my mobile number or email address given below. Thank you for your kind understanding. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Your Sincerely, Li Wei

The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007.

The graph is showing the amount of visitors from other countries to three regions of one country in Europe from 1987 year to 2007 year. From overall look, we can clearly see all three areas have increase in visitors over the 20 years period. In 1987, the Seaside had most overseas visitors with around 2.5 million, followed by City area with just over 1 million visitors. Mountains area had least visitors, less than 0.5 million that year. Over next 10 years to 1997, Seaside still was most popular but have slower increase to about 3.3 million, while City had faster growth to around 2.2 million visitors in 1997. Mountains also grew in this period but still have lowest number of the three regions. From 1997 to 2007, the City area saw very big increase and overtook Seaside to become most visited, reaching over 5 million overseas visitors in 2007. Seaside also kept growing but more gradual to about 4.4 million in 2007. Mountains had steady increase in this 10 years to reach around 1.8 million visitors from overseas, but remained least popular of the three places over full 20 years period. In conclusion, the graph shows clear trend of growth in amount of visitors from abroad to all three region, with City becoming top destination by 2007 from being second in 1987 beginning. Seaside grew more slower but still very popular, while Mountains stayed at bottom but also had quite big increase in 20 years.

Economic progress is often used to measure a country's success. However, some people believe that other factors are more important in measuring a country's success. What other factors do you think can be used to measure a country's success? Do you think one factor is more important than others?

In my opinion, many other factors except economic progress can be use to measure a country success. I think that the most important factor is people happyness and satisfaction with their lifes. First of all, economic progress is not always bring happyness and satisfaction to people. For example, in many developed countries with strong economy, people are often unhappy and stressed because of high pressure at work and lack of free time for family and hobbies. They work long hours every day to earn money, but they don't have time to enjoy their life. In contrast, in some less developed countries with weaker economy, people may be more happy because they have more time for family, friends and hobbies, even if they have less money. Moreover, other factors such as education, healthcare, safety and environment are also very important for measuring a country success. A country with good education system can provide people with knowledge and skills to improve their life quality. A country with good healthcare system can ensure people stay healthy and live longer. A safe country with low crime rate can make people feel secure and peaceful. And a country with clean environment and beautiful nature can provide people with fresh air and nice places to relax and enjoy life. All these factors can contribute to people happyness and satisfaction, which is more important than just economic progress. In conclusion, I believe that happyness and satisfaction of people is the most important factor to measure a country success. Economic progress is important, but it is not the only factor and not always bring happyness. Other factors such as education, healthcare, safety and environment are also very important and can contribute to people happyness and satisfaction, which is the ultimate goal of a successful country.

Over the past third years, technological changes have resulted in greatly improved communication, and it is now possible for individuals and companies to cooperate globally. What impact does this change have on individuals and society?

In the recent Thirty years, Communications have been more better due to advanced technology, peoples and organizations can now collaborate with anyone around the world. This Transformation had a lot effect for the individual and also the whole society. To start, This improving in technologies has enabled individuals to connect with others regardless of their place. For the example, people can communicate and having conversations from anywhere through using applications like Skype or zoom. This means they can maintaining relationships, share ideas and connect with the people who have same interests, even though they live far away. This widening of connections has a big effect on individual's social lifes and also their professional Networks. Moreover, companies also can reach broader scope globally to find talents and ideas. In previously, businesses were limited to work with only local areas, but now they can hiring employees and find partners all over the world. This allows access to divers perspectives, specialized knowledge and the best talents, which can leads to innovations and Improvements in products, services. Global collaborations also meaning more opprtunities for employees, as they can accessing jobs and projects from anywhere. At the socially level, these changes drive toward an more globalized society where people can sharing ideas, cultures and resources across borders. This can fostering global Understanding and cooperation. but we also considering the challenges that came with it. Inequalities in access the technology is still existing, and there can been cultural conflicts or losing local traditions as a result of globalization. In Conclusion, the advancements for communications technology over third past years had a significant influence on the ways individuals and companies connects and cooperates globally. While brings social and professional opportunitys, it's vitally to address challenges and make sure these changes brings positive results for all members off society.

A student you know is coming to visit the town or city where you live next weekend. Write a letter to the student. In the letter: Tell the student about some places in your town or city that he or she should visit. Give instructions about transportation in your city. Give contact details for the student so he or she can get in touch with you.

Dear Ameya, I was very happy when I heared that you will visit my city next weekend. There are many place in my city that you should see when you come here. Firstly, i think you should go to see the big park in the center of the city. It is very beautiful park with many trees and flowers. There is also a big lake in the park where you can go boating if you want. Another place you should visit is the old castle on the hill. It is very old castle from medieval times and it has a great view of the city from the top. To go to these places, you can take the bus or the train. The bus is more cheaper but the train is more faster. You can buy tickets for the bus or train at the station. If you want to walk, the park is not far from the city center, but the castle is a bit far so maybe better to take transport. Please call me when you arrive so we can meet. My phone number is 555-1234 and my email is john@email.com. I am looking forward to see you next weekend! Best wishes, John

You recently attended a meeting at a hotel. When you returned home, you found that you had left some important papers at the hotel. Write a letter to the hotel manager. In your letter: explain what happened describe the papers you left suggest a way for the hotel to return the papers to you

Dear Hotel Manager, I writing to you because i have big problem. Recently i attend meeting in you hotel for my work. Meeting was in conference room on level 3 and there were many peoples there from my company. I take many papers with me to meeting, some of them very important. After meeting finish, i go home directly. But when i arrive to my house, i realize that i forget some papers in hotel! I think maybe i leave them on table in conference room, or maybe in my room. Papers i forget were in blue folder, and have my name on top of each page. Is very important contract details that i need for my job. Can you please check if you find these papers? If you find, can you please contact me urgently. You can send me email, my address is john.doe@email.com. Or you can call my phone number, is 123-4567-8901. If you find papers, please let me know and i can come to hotel to collect them. Or if you prefer, you can also send them to my office address: 123 Main Street, Anytown. I very grateful if you can help me with this problem. Please let me know if you have any questions or need more information. Thank you for your assist. Sincerely, John Doe

In many parts of the world, children and teenagers are committing more crimes. What are the causes? How should these young criminals be prevented from committing crime?

In these times many childs and teenages are do more crimes in world. There are many reasons for this and some ways to stop it I think. One cause is they have bad family. If parents not take care of child or abuse them, child may turn to crime. Also if family poor and cannot afford things, children may steal to get what they want. Another reason is bad infleunce from friends. If friends are criminal, they may pressure to join in crimes too. Finally, some young people just have bad personlity and enjoy doing crime for fun or excite. There are a few ways to stop young criminal I believe. Firstly, government should provide more support to poor family so children do not need to steal. Secondly, there should be more activity and program for young people so they have something to do instead of crime. For example, sport team or youth center where they can go after school. Lastly, police need to be more strict on young criminal and give them harsh punishment to scare them from doing again. In conclusion, there are several reason why child and teenage crime is increase, but also ways to prevent it. If we work together - government, police, family, community - we can help stop young people from become criminal and make society more safe for everyone.

A person's worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honor, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

In todays world, many people are beleiving that a persons value is determin by there social status and material possesions. They think the old values like honor, kindness and trust is no longer important. I am agree with this opinion to some extend. Firstly, social status has become a major factor in judging a persons worth in society today. The people who have high positions in there jobs or well-known in the community are often more respected and value by others. For example, a CEO of big company will be see as more successful and important than a regular worker, even if the worker is kind and trustworthy person. This shows how much emphasis is put on social status nowadays. Secondly, material possessions also play a significant role in determining someone's worth. People who has lots of expensive things like fancy cars, big houses, and designer clothes are often admire and looked up to by others. They are seen as successful and value members of society, regardless of there actual character or values. On the other hand, people who dont have many material possessions may be looked down upon or judge as less worthy, even if they are honest and kind. However, I believe that old-fashioned values like honor, kindness, and trust should still be important in judging a persons worth. These qualities are what make someone a good person and a value member of society. Kindness and trust can help the build strong relationships and create a positive community. Honor is also important quality that shows a persons integrity and moral character. In conclusion, while social status and material possessions may be major factor in judging a persons worth today, I beleive that old-fashioned values shouldnt be forgotten. A persons true worth should be based on there character, values, and contributions to society, not just there status or possessions.

In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?

In many of the countrys arund the world, people from rural are moving to citys, so population in countryside are decreasing. I think this develupment is more negative than positive. First of all, when rural people moving to cities, there are less people in countryside to work in agriculture and farming. This is causes problems for food production and supply in the country. If there are not enough poeple to grow crops and raise animals, it can lead to food shortages and higer prices for food in the citys. Secondly, when too many poeple move to the citys, it can create problems like overcrowdng and pollution. The citys infrastructure, like housing, transportation and healtcare, may not be able to handle the increased population. This can lead to poor living conditions and helth problems for city residents. On the other hand, there are som positive aspects to this trend. When rural people move to citys, they have access to better education and job opportunities. This can help to improve there economic situation and quality of life. Additionaly, the movement of people to citys can contribute to economic growth and develupment in the country as a hole. In conclusion, while there may be som benefits to rural people moving to citys, I believe the negative consequences outweigh the positives. It is important for goverments to find ways to support and develope rural areas, so that people have opportunities and incentives to stay in the countryside. This can help to ensure a balanc between urban and rural populations and promote sustainable development throuout the country.

In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an aging population creates problems for governments. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people. To what extent do the advantages of having an aging population outweigh the disadvantages?

Nowdays, in most cuntries people living more longer than in past. This trend of aging poppulations causing much debates. Some peoples claims it making issues and problem for goverment. Other think more elder citizen advantagous for a society. One hands, a aging population definately have disadvantage. firstly, older peoples tend have more health problems, which put strain the healthcare systems. Goverment must spend lots more money to maintaining care for elderly. aslo, as people live longer, the cost of pensions increase greatly too. This mean that goverments has pay out more in pemsion, which can be hard affording. Another challenge is that with more aging population, there less working aged people supporting the economy, making productivity go down. But on other hand, elder peoples bring benefits as well. To begins, many older citizens remain active in society, doing valueable volunteer work. This helps to strengthen commnities and provide crucial services. Additionally, elders possessing lot of knowledge and life experence that can shared with young generations. This wisdom help society progress. Lastly, senior citizens may contribute economicly by continung to work part time or starting small busnesses. In conclusions, I belive benefts of aging population can outweight the drawbacks if managed properly. governmants must prepare for challenges and costs, but shoud also recognize the ways elder citizen bring value to society. With right approach, we can harness potential and wisom of senior citizens to make stronger communitys.

The pie charts below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts showing the percentage of time spend by working adults on different activities in one country, in 1958 and 2008. Most striking differences are in the time spend working and time spent on leisure activities. In 1958, the most time adult have spent working, at 48%. However, by 2008, this has dropped to only 20%. In contrast, the amount of their time spent on leisure have rise from 11% in 1958 to 33% in the 2008. Another notable changes is the increase in time dedicated to childcare. In 1958, adult spent 3% of they time on this, but by 2008 it had risen to 12% of their time. Time spent on housework also increased, from 10% to 20% during the 50 year period. In conclusion, the pie charts show that over 50-year period, working adult in this countries have had a significant shift in how they spend them time. Work have decreased, while leisure and childcare have increased. This suggest a change in priorities and lifestyle of adult in this country between 1958 and 2008.

It is important for people to take risks, both in their professional lives and their personal lives. Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages?

Nowadays, more and more people are taking risks in their lives, both professionally and personally. Some people argue that taking risks have more advantages than disadvantages, while others believe the opposite. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the argument and give my opinion. On the one hand, taking risks can lead to new opportunities and experiences. For example, if you take a risk and start your own business, you have the chance to be your own boss and make more money. Similarly, if you take a risk and travel to a new country, you can learn about new cultures and make new friends. Taking risks can also help you to grow as a person and become more confident. On the other hand, taking risks can also have negative consequences. If you take a risk and it doesn't pay off, you could lose money or even your job. For example, if you invest all your savings in a new business and it fails, you could end up in debt. Taking risks can also be dangerous, especially if you're taking physical risks like extreme sports. In my opinion, I think that the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages. I believe that taking risks is important for personal growth and development. Without taking risks, we would never learn new things or have new experiences. Of course, it's important to be smart about the risks you take and not to take unnecessary risks. But overall, I think that taking risks is a good thing. In conclusion, taking risks can have both advantages and disadvantages. While there are some potential negative consequences, I believe that the benefits of taking risks outweigh the drawbacks. Taking risks can lead to new opportunities, experiences, and personal growth.

Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the modern world, advertising has become a powerful tool for businesses to promote their products and increase sales. Some people argue that the high sales of popular consumer goods are a result of advertising rather than the real needs of society. I agree with this view to a certain extent. One reason why I agree is that advertising can create a false sense of need for products. Companies often use persuasive techniques in their advertisements, such as celebrity endorsements or emotional appeals, which can make people believe they need a certain product even if they don't. For example, a person may see an advertisement for the latest smartphone and feel like they need to buy it, even if their current phone is still working fine. This shows how advertising can manipulate people's perceptions of what they need. Moreover, advertising can also make products seem more desirable than they actually are. Companies often use glamorous or idealized images in their advertisements to make their products look more appealing. For instance, a fast food chain may show a picture of a perfectly-made burger in their advertisement, which may not reflect the actual quality of the food. This can lead people to buy products based on false expectations rather than real value. However, while advertising does play a significant role in driving sales, it is not the only factor. In some cases, popular consumer goods may also reflect genuine needs or desires within society. For example, a new medical device that improves people's health may become popular due to a real need for better healthcare, rather than just because of advertising. To sum up, I partially agree that high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising more than the real needs of society. Advertising can create false needs and make products seem more desirable than they are. However, in some cases, popular products may also reflect genuine societal needs or desires.

Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

In this days we have a contrversial topic. Many people think that young persons shold do volunteering jobs for help the comnunity, but I dont agree with this attitude. I think that unpaid work for young is not the best desition, and there are many reasons to explain it. The first point is that in much cases, the person is study at the colege and don have time to work without gain money. They need money for pay the books or the school. If the guvernment obligated to do voluntering jobs, maybe they dont can study more. So this is a big problem, young people has to focuse in the studys for be preparated to work in a good job in the future. In second place, if we obligate young people to work gratuitous, the empresas can stop to paid for works that now young people do free, so they will never can find good jobs. In this way the young people will be poor all the live. Thats no good for the economic of the country and the people. On the other hand, there are some little advantages. For example, if the youngs work in voluntering maybe they gain experiencie for when find a real work. Also they can help the people more needed. But I think that the disvantages are more importants. In conclusion, the goverment has to focus to give more opportunities and facilites to study for young people, no obligating to work gratis.

A big salary is more important than job satisfaction. Do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, many people think that a high salary is more important than being satisfied with their job. I completely disagree with this opinion. In this essay i will explain my reasoning for this. Firstly, job saticfaction is crucial for a person's mental health and well-being. If someone is unhappy with their job, it can lead to stress, anxiety and even depression. This can negatively impact their personal life and relationshps. Even if they are earning a lot of money, it will not compensate for the emotional toll of being miserable at work every day. Furthermore, when people enjoy their job, they are more likely to be motivated and productive. They will put in extra effort and take pride in their work, which can lead to better results for the company. On the other hand, if someone is only working for the paycheck and does not care about their job, they may do the bare minimum and not perform as well. In my opinion, it is important to find a balance between a good salary and job satisfacton. Of course, everyone needs to earn enough money to support themselves and their family. However, it should not come at the cost of their happiness and mental well-being. It is possible to find a job that pays well and also aligns with one's interests and values. In conclusion, while a high salary is important, I believe that job satisfication is even more crucial. It is essential for a person's overall happiness and can lead to better performance at work. Rather than prioritizing money above all else, people should strive to find a career that they are passionate about and that provides a good balance between financial stability and personal fulfilment.

Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have the freedom to do any sport or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some peoples says goverments should to ban the dengerous sports while other says people should be having the freedom of doing any sports they want or any activities. I will discus both views and give mine opinion. From one hand, I can undarstand why government wants to banning the dengerous sports activites. Firstly, it is because those activties are really risky and can makes people injured or in worse cases even death. Secondly, banning thoose activties will help to saves people life and keep them save. Finally, government have the responsible to protects people from harming themselfs. On the other hands, I belief people should allowed to do any sports or activite they want to do becose they hav the freedom to choose for them self. People should be able to doing anything they likes as long as they are responsbile and know the consquences. Sometime, dengerous sports can also helps people to chalenge themself and improves there skills. So, its not fair to take this oportunity away from people who realy enjoy doing these activties. In conclution, although I understand that government want to protect people by banning dengerous sport, I thing people should have the freedom of doing any sports or activties they want. However, goverment can putted some rules and regulatin to make sure people doing it safely and responsible. This way, people can still enjoy these activty while being protect from harm.

More and more people are moving away from an agricultural background to relocate to cities in order to look for work. What will be the consequences of this? What solutions can you offer?

In this modern day, a lot of people leave their hometown in countryside and move to big city for finding job. This trend have some consequences that I will discuss in this easy. I will also provide some solution to resolve this issue. The first consequence of people leaving agriculture and move to city is the lack of labour in farm. When many young move away, there will be not enough worker to work in the farm. This can lead to decrease in crops production, which can affect food supply for the whole country. Moreover, the lack of successor in farm can make the agriculture sector decline in future. Another consequence is the overpopulation in city. With more and more people moving to city, the city become very crowded. This can lead to many problem such as traffic jam, air pollution, and high crime rates. The city infrastructure may not be able to handle the rapid increase in population, which can affect the quality of life for city resident. To solve this problem, I think the government should provide more support for agriculture sector. They can give subsidy to farmer to encourage them to continue working in farm. They can also invest in modern farming technology to make agriculture work more efficient and attractive for young people. In addition, the government should also create more job opportunity in rural area, so people don't have to move to city for work. In conclusion, the trend of people leaving agriculture for city job can have negative impact on both rural and urban area. However, with proper solution from the government, this issue can be resolved. The government need to support agriculture sector and create more job in rural area to encourage people to stay in their hometown.